民事保護(hù)令—家庭暴力受害人的事前法律救濟(jì)
發(fā)布時間：2019-01-22 20:28
【摘要】： 國外許多研究機構(gòu)和團(tuán)體的調(diào)查分析表明:家庭暴力是一個跨越國界、意識形態(tài)、階級、種族的全球性問題,婦女和兒童是家庭暴力的主要受害者。我國的家庭暴力現(xiàn)狀也不容忽視。家庭暴力一直存在于社會學(xué)家和法學(xué)界人士的研究視野。自1995年聯(lián)合國第四次世界婦女大會召開以來,這一問題更成為了各國政府及非政府組織所關(guān)注的焦點。從實踐調(diào)查和學(xué)術(shù)研究的維度來看,國內(nèi)學(xué)界對家庭暴力問題的探討主要集中在心理學(xué)、社會學(xué)、人口學(xué)和自由女權(quán)主義等角度及層面,也有一些學(xué)者從法哲學(xué)、法社會學(xué)和法倫理學(xué)等視角審視家庭暴力問題,并就如何防治家庭暴力,尤其是如何救濟(jì)家庭暴力受害人等方面作了許多有益的法律思考。這些研究對于我們進(jìn)一步探索家庭暴力受害人的保護(hù)機制無疑意義重大。但是,對于在家庭暴力發(fā)生前如何更好地保護(hù)潛在的受害人,以及在家庭暴力發(fā)生過程中如何對受害人實施救助以使損害后果降低等方面論及不多,從制度層面進(jìn)行設(shè)計則更少。 眾所周知,防治家庭暴力既需要有事后懲罰和救濟(jì),又要注重事前預(yù)防和干預(yù),從社會成本來看,事前預(yù)防及干預(yù)機制的建構(gòu)意義更大。本文在分析我國大陸反家庭暴力法律實踐的基礎(chǔ)上,認(rèn)為對家庭暴力行為人的懲罰和對受害人的救濟(jì)手段比較完備,但是,如何有效預(yù)防家庭暴力,以及如何有效救助家庭暴力受害人卻缺乏事前救濟(jì)制度的考量。在考查分析美國、英國、澳大利亞、日本、加拿大以及我國臺灣地區(qū)、香港地區(qū)等國家或地區(qū)對于家庭暴力事前干預(yù)的法律實踐和制度創(chuàng)新過程中,發(fā)現(xiàn)這些國家和地區(qū)實施的“民事保護(hù)令制度”對于有效救濟(jì)家庭暴力受害人效果顯著。雖然不同國家和地區(qū)婚姻家庭法律制度和文化不盡相同,但家庭暴力的表現(xiàn)形式和后果卻具有驚人的相似性,構(gòu)建民事保護(hù)令制度對于中國大陸完善反家庭暴力法律體系是可行的。 論文首先分析探討我國大陸反家庭暴力的法律實踐及機制缺失,引出我國對如何有效預(yù)防家庭暴力問題、如何有效救濟(jì)家庭暴力受害人缺乏事前救濟(jì)制度的思考。在著重分析、比較考查美國、英國、澳大利亞、日本、加拿大以及我國臺灣地區(qū)、香港地區(qū)等國家或地區(qū)在這一問題上的法律實踐和制度創(chuàng)新的基礎(chǔ)上,深入論證我國大陸借鑒和構(gòu)建民事保護(hù)令制度的理論基礎(chǔ)(價值依據(jù)),最后參酌我國國情提出構(gòu)建我國大陸民事保護(hù)令制度的具體建議。
[Abstract]:The investigation and analysis of many foreign research institutions and groups show that domestic violence is a global problem that transcends national boundaries, ideologies, classes and races, and that women and children are the main victims of domestic violence. The present situation of domestic violence in our country should not be ignored. Domestic violence has always existed in the research field of sociologists and jurists. Since the fourth World Conference on Women was held in 1995, this issue has become the focus of attention of governments and non-governmental organizations. From the perspective of practical investigation and academic research, domestic scholars mainly focus on the issues of domestic violence from the perspectives and levels of psychology, sociology, demography and liberal feminism, and some scholars also focus on the philosophy of law. From the perspective of sociology of law and legal ethics, this paper examines the problem of domestic violence, and makes a lot of useful legal considerations on how to prevent and cure domestic violence, especially how to relieve the victims of domestic violence. These studies are of great significance for us to further explore the protection mechanism of victims of domestic violence. However, there is little discussion on how to better protect potential victims prior to the occurrence of domestic violence and how to provide relief to victims in the course of domestic violence in order to reduce the consequences of damage, Design from the institutional level is even less. As we all know, prevention and treatment of domestic violence need not only punishment and relief after the event, but also pay attention to prevention and intervention in advance. From the social cost, the construction of pre-prevention and intervention mechanism is more significant. Based on the analysis of the legal practice of anti-domestic violence in mainland China, this paper thinks that the punishment of the perpetrators of domestic violence and the relief means to the victims are relatively complete, but how to effectively prevent domestic violence, And how to effectively rescue victims of domestic violence but lack of prior relief system. In the course of examining and analyzing the legal practice and institutional innovation of countries or regions such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Japan, Canada, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and other countries or regions that intervene in domestic violence in advance, It is found that the civil protection order system implemented in these countries and regions has a remarkable effect on the relief of victims of domestic violence. Although marriage and family legal systems and cultures vary from country to country and region, the manifestations and consequences of domestic violence are surprisingly similar, The establishment of civil protection order system is feasible for improving the anti-domestic violence legal system in mainland China. Firstly, this paper analyzes and discusses the lack of legal practice and mechanism against domestic violence in mainland China, which leads to the consideration of how to effectively prevent domestic violence and how to effectively relieve the victims of domestic violence without prior relief system. On the basis of analyzing and comparing the legal practice and institutional innovation of the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Japan, Canada, Taiwan and Hong Kong on this issue, The theoretical basis (value basis) of the civil protection order system in mainland China is discussed in depth. Finally, some concrete suggestions on the civil protection order system in mainland China are put forward according to the national conditions of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：D913.9
本文編號：2413539
[Abstract]:The investigation and analysis of many foreign research institutions and groups show that domestic violence is a global problem that transcends national boundaries, ideologies, classes and races, and that women and children are the main victims of domestic violence. The present situation of domestic violence in our country should not be ignored. Domestic violence has always existed in the research field of sociologists and jurists. Since the fourth World Conference on Women was held in 1995, this issue has become the focus of attention of governments and non-governmental organizations. From the perspective of practical investigation and academic research, domestic scholars mainly focus on the issues of domestic violence from the perspectives and levels of psychology, sociology, demography and liberal feminism, and some scholars also focus on the philosophy of law. From the perspective of sociology of law and legal ethics, this paper examines the problem of domestic violence, and makes a lot of useful legal considerations on how to prevent and cure domestic violence, especially how to relieve the victims of domestic violence. These studies are of great significance for us to further explore the protection mechanism of victims of domestic violence. However, there is little discussion on how to better protect potential victims prior to the occurrence of domestic violence and how to provide relief to victims in the course of domestic violence in order to reduce the consequences of damage, Design from the institutional level is even less. As we all know, prevention and treatment of domestic violence need not only punishment and relief after the event, but also pay attention to prevention and intervention in advance. From the social cost, the construction of pre-prevention and intervention mechanism is more significant. Based on the analysis of the legal practice of anti-domestic violence in mainland China, this paper thinks that the punishment of the perpetrators of domestic violence and the relief means to the victims are relatively complete, but how to effectively prevent domestic violence, And how to effectively rescue victims of domestic violence but lack of prior relief system. In the course of examining and analyzing the legal practice and institutional innovation of countries or regions such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Japan, Canada, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and other countries or regions that intervene in domestic violence in advance, It is found that the civil protection order system implemented in these countries and regions has a remarkable effect on the relief of victims of domestic violence. Although marriage and family legal systems and cultures vary from country to country and region, the manifestations and consequences of domestic violence are surprisingly similar, The establishment of civil protection order system is feasible for improving the anti-domestic violence legal system in mainland China. Firstly, this paper analyzes and discusses the lack of legal practice and mechanism against domestic violence in mainland China, which leads to the consideration of how to effectively prevent domestic violence and how to effectively relieve the victims of domestic violence without prior relief system. On the basis of analyzing and comparing the legal practice and institutional innovation of the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Japan, Canada, Taiwan and Hong Kong on this issue, The theoretical basis (value basis) of the civil protection order system in mainland China is discussed in depth. Finally, some concrete suggestions on the civil protection order system in mainland China are put forward according to the national conditions of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：D913.9
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 薛寧蘭;胥麗;;論家庭暴力防治法中的民事保護(hù)令制度[J];中華女子學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年04期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條
1 羅魏斌;我國民事保護(hù)令程序的前瞻性研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2010年
2 陸嫻;論我國家庭暴力民事保護(hù)令制度之構(gòu)建[D];中央民族大學(xué);2012年
3 胥麗;民事保護(hù)令制度之探究[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2012年
4 龍良碑;我國設(shè)立民事保護(hù)令制度問題研究[D];中南大學(xué);2012年
，本文編號：2413539
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hyflw/2413539.html
