論擅自處分夫妻共同財產(chǎn)行為的效力
發(fā)布時間：2018-12-16 00:39
【摘要】：隨著夫妻共同財產(chǎn)的不斷增加,個人和家庭參與市場活動也越來越多。在夫妻處分共有財產(chǎn)時會涉及到多方關系,對夫妻內部財產(chǎn)和第三人的合法權益造成影響,也會影響整個社會交易秩序,進而影響社會的和諧。在現(xiàn)實生活中,擅自處分夫妻共同財產(chǎn)的現(xiàn)象已經(jīng)屢見不鮮,如何平衡夫妻一方的財產(chǎn)利益和第三人的財產(chǎn)利益也尤其重要。在擅自處分夫妻共同財產(chǎn)行為的效力上適用物權法上的規(guī)定,但是物權法設計共有制度的目的與婚姻法不同。物權法可以讓民事主體選擇共同擁有物還是自己擁有,以實現(xiàn)對物價值最大利用。但是,婚姻家庭法屬于身份法,與其他的民事法律相比,身份屬性很強烈。作為可以取得所有權的善意取得制度,其目的是平衡權利人與善意第三人之間利益,維護交易安全。當其用于婚姻法中決定處分行為效力時,會過于維護第三人的權益忽視夫妻間的權益。此外,在分析夫妻處分共同財產(chǎn)行為的效力時,我國現(xiàn)行法律和司法解釋的規(guī)定還模糊不具體:平等的處理權規(guī)定不具體;日常家事的范圍沒有明確界定;擅自處分夫妻共同財產(chǎn)的性質也有爭論,那它的效力又是怎樣;現(xiàn)行法律傾向于保護善意第三人,如何保護夫妻非處分方的利益?《婚姻法司法解釋(三)》增加了兩項救濟制度:夫妻婚內分割共同財產(chǎn)制度和處分共有房屋后的離婚損害賠償制度。新增設的這兩種制度都在保護夫妻財產(chǎn)利益上有所進步,但總體保護力度還不夠,存在許多不足之處。本文以分析擅自處分夫妻共同財產(chǎn)行為的效力為基礎來探討這些問題,并總結現(xiàn)行法律對夫妻財產(chǎn)利益的保護存在的缺陷,提出一些建議。
[Abstract]:With the increasing of husband and wife's common property, individuals and families participate in market activities more and more. When the couple dispose of the common property, it will involve various relationships, which will have an impact on the couple's internal property and the legitimate rights and interests of the third party, will also affect the whole social transaction order, and then affect the social harmony. In real life, it is common to dispose of the joint property of husband and wife without authorization, how to balance the property interests of one spouse and the property interests of the third party is especially important. The law of real right is applicable to the validity of unauthorized disposition of joint property of husband and wife, but the purpose of designing a common system in real right law is different from that of marriage law. The law of real right allows the civil subject to choose whether to own the joint property or to own it, so as to realize the maximum use of the property value. However, the law of marriage and family belongs to the law of identity, compared with other civil laws, the identity attribute is very strong. As a bona fide acquisition system, the purpose of the system is to balance the interests between the obligee and the bona fide third party and to maintain the transaction security. When it is used to determine the validity of disciplinary action in marriage law, it will protect the rights and interests of third party and ignore the rights and interests of husband and wife. In addition, in the analysis of the effectiveness of the disposition of joint property, the current legal and judicial interpretation of the provisions are vague and not specific: the equal right to deal with the provisions are not specific, the scope of daily household is not clearly defined; The nature of unauthorized disposition of joint property of husband and wife is also controversial, then what is its effectiveness; Existing laws tend to protect bona fide third parties, How to protect the interests of the non-disciplinary parties? the Judicial interpretation of Marriage Law (3) adds two relief systems: the system of splitting the common property within the marriage and the system of compensation for divorce damage after the disposition of the common house. The two new systems have made progress in protecting the property interests of husband and wife, but the overall protection is not enough, and there are many deficiencies. Based on the analysis of the effectiveness of unauthorized disposition of joint property of husband and wife, this paper discusses these problems, summarizes the shortcomings of the current law in protecting the property interests of husband and wife, and puts forward some suggestions.
【學位授予單位】：湘潭大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.9
本文編號：2381558
[Abstract]:With the increasing of husband and wife's common property, individuals and families participate in market activities more and more. When the couple dispose of the common property, it will involve various relationships, which will have an impact on the couple's internal property and the legitimate rights and interests of the third party, will also affect the whole social transaction order, and then affect the social harmony. In real life, it is common to dispose of the joint property of husband and wife without authorization, how to balance the property interests of one spouse and the property interests of the third party is especially important. The law of real right is applicable to the validity of unauthorized disposition of joint property of husband and wife, but the purpose of designing a common system in real right law is different from that of marriage law. The law of real right allows the civil subject to choose whether to own the joint property or to own it, so as to realize the maximum use of the property value. However, the law of marriage and family belongs to the law of identity, compared with other civil laws, the identity attribute is very strong. As a bona fide acquisition system, the purpose of the system is to balance the interests between the obligee and the bona fide third party and to maintain the transaction security. When it is used to determine the validity of disciplinary action in marriage law, it will protect the rights and interests of third party and ignore the rights and interests of husband and wife. In addition, in the analysis of the effectiveness of the disposition of joint property, the current legal and judicial interpretation of the provisions are vague and not specific: the equal right to deal with the provisions are not specific, the scope of daily household is not clearly defined; The nature of unauthorized disposition of joint property of husband and wife is also controversial, then what is its effectiveness; Existing laws tend to protect bona fide third parties, How to protect the interests of the non-disciplinary parties? the Judicial interpretation of Marriage Law (3) adds two relief systems: the system of splitting the common property within the marriage and the system of compensation for divorce damage after the disposition of the common house. The two new systems have made progress in protecting the property interests of husband and wife, but the overall protection is not enough, and there are many deficiencies. Based on the analysis of the effectiveness of unauthorized disposition of joint property of husband and wife, this paper discusses these problems, summarizes the shortcomings of the current law in protecting the property interests of husband and wife, and puts forward some suggestions.
【學位授予單位】：湘潭大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.9
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 呂春娟;;我國非常夫妻財產(chǎn)制之建構[J];浙江工商大學學報;2015年01期
2 楊晉玲;;平衡抑或失衡——對《婚姻法司法解釋(三)》第11條的評析及解決途徑的選擇[J];云南大學學報(法學版);2014年03期
3 陳葦;姜大偉;;論婚姻家庭住房權的優(yōu)先保護[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2013年04期
4 劉貴祥;;論無權處分和善意取得的沖突和協(xié)調——以私賣夫妻共有房屋時買受人的保護為中心[J];法學家;2011年05期
5 辛正郁;;夫妻共有房屋單方處分中的法律適用問題[J];人民司法;2011年19期
6 孫若軍;;家庭共同生活居住所需房屋不適用善意取得制度研究[J];政治與法律;2011年04期
7 熊玉梅;;論交易安全視野下的夫妻日常家事代理權[J];法學雜志;2011年03期
8 吳楠楠;;夫妻一方擅自處分共有財產(chǎn)問題的法律探析[J];商業(yè)文化(學術版);2009年05期
9 張付;;不動產(chǎn)善意取得與物權法公示公信原則[J];法制與社會;2008年35期
10 劉巧麗;;論共有人擅自轉讓共有財產(chǎn)的法律效果——以夫妻一方擅自轉讓不動產(chǎn)為例[J];法制與社會;2007年09期
相關重要報紙文章 前3條
1 金健峰;;第三人能否取得夫妻一方擅自處理的共同財產(chǎn)[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟報;2006年
2 曲華軍;;論我國的善意取得制度[N];人民法院報;2005年
3 張素軍;宋大運;;“夫妻共同財產(chǎn)”的外延[N];人民法院報;2002年
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 裴樺;夫妻共同財產(chǎn)制研究[D];吉林大學;2008年
，本文編號：2381558
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hyflw/2381558.html
