【摘要】：從社會(huì)實(shí)踐的發(fā)展情況來(lái)看,社會(huì)上第三者以“通奸”、“姘居”和“重婚”行為干擾他人婚姻家庭的現(xiàn)象愈演愈烈,已經(jīng)嚴(yán)重侵害到婚姻中無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)配偶的合法權(quán)益和社會(huì)公共秩序。所以,法律是時(shí)候該介入道德調(diào)整的領(lǐng)域,將此類(lèi)行為納入法律體系之中。本文將立足于我國(guó)立法和實(shí)務(wù)現(xiàn)狀,運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)分析、比較分析、個(gè)案分析及理論聯(lián)系實(shí)際等方法,從與“第三者”概念和內(nèi)容相關(guān)的理論出發(fā),闡述用法律規(guī)范對(duì)其規(guī)制的合理性以及論述第三者干擾行為的侵權(quán)性質(zhì)。在此基礎(chǔ)上結(jié)合我國(guó)當(dāng)前立法狀況和司法實(shí)踐來(lái)分析我國(guó)立法上對(duì)于“第三者問(wèn)題”規(guī)定的不足之處,并提出相關(guān)建議措施,以此解決“第三者問(wèn)題”,保護(hù)個(gè)人合法權(quán)益,促進(jìn)社會(huì)健康發(fā)展。本文除引言和結(jié)語(yǔ)外共分為五個(gè)部分。第一部分介紹了涉及第三者干擾他人合法婚姻關(guān)系的相關(guān)案例,以案例分析來(lái)介紹我國(guó)“第三者現(xiàn)象”在我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中的大概發(fā)展?fàn)顩r,并以從案例中反映出的與第三者有關(guān)的問(wèn)題引出下文對(duì)“第三者干擾他人婚姻關(guān)系行為”的討論。第二部分介紹了對(duì)第三者干擾婚姻關(guān)系行為性質(zhì)的認(rèn)定,通過(guò)對(duì)“第三者”的界定、第三者干擾他人婚姻行為的種類(lèi)及其性質(zhì)分析,以此進(jìn)一步說(shuō)明第三者承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的合理性。第三部分分析了第三者侵害他人合法婚姻關(guān)系侵權(quán)責(zé)任承擔(dān)的過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任歸責(zé)原則和承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的四個(gè)構(gòu)成要件。第四部分介紹了英美法系和大陸法系的一些主要國(guó)家的立法和實(shí)踐情況,以此來(lái)分析我國(guó)在立法與實(shí)務(wù)現(xiàn)狀中出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題。最后一部分是在以上部分的基礎(chǔ)上分析我國(guó)對(duì)無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)配偶的救濟(jì)困境并提出相應(yīng)的侵權(quán)責(zé)任制度構(gòu)想。
[Abstract]:Judging from the development of social practice, the phenomenon that the third party interferes with the marriage and family of others by "adultery", "concubine" and "bigamy" becomes more and more serious. It has seriously infringed the legal rights and interests of the no-fault spouse in marriage and public order. So it is time for the law to step into the realm of moral adjustment and incorporate such behaviour into the legal system. Based on the present situation of legislation and practice in our country, this paper will apply the methods of literature analysis, comparative analysis, case analysis and the combination of theory and practice, and proceed from the theory related to the concept and content of "third party". This paper expounds the rationality of the regulation by legal norms and the tort nature of the third party interference. On this basis, combined with the current legislative situation and judicial practice of our country, this paper analyzes the deficiencies of the provisions on "third party problems" in our legislation, and puts forward some relevant suggestions, so as to solve "third party problems" and protect the legitimate rights and interests of individuals. To promote the healthy development of society. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into five parts. The first part introduces the related cases involving the third party interfering with the legal marriage relationship of others, and introduces the general development of the third party phenomenon in the judicial practice of our country with the case analysis. The discussion of "the third party's interference in marriage" is given by the third party's problems reflected in the case. The second part introduces the nature of the third party's behavior of interfering with the marriage relationship, through the definition of the "third party", the third party interferes with the other person's marriage behavior, and analyzes the nature of the third party's interference in marriage. In order to further explain the third party to bear the rationality of tort liability. The third part analyzes the principle of liability attribution and the four elements of tort liability. The fourth part introduces the legislation and practice of some major countries in Anglo-American law system and civil law system, so as to analyze the problems in legislation and practice in our country. The last part is based on the above part to analyze the relief predicament of our country to the no-fault spouse and put forward the corresponding conception of tort liability system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.9

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 沈海峰;“強(qiáng)制第三者險(xiǎn)”何時(shí)現(xiàn)身——“強(qiáng)制第三者險(xiǎn)”與“商業(yè)第三者險(xiǎn)”的區(qū)別[J];浙江農(nóng)村機(jī)電;2005年02期

2 ;對(duì)《關(guān)于要求解釋交通安全責(zé)任統(tǒng)籌能否視同第三者責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)問(wèn)題的請(qǐng)示》的意見(jiàn)[J];司法業(yè)務(wù)文選;2005年26期

3 金軍;;被自己的車(chē)撞傷能否按“第三者”進(jìn)行索賠?[J];安全與健康;2007年14期

4 ;云南省機(jī)動(dòng)車(chē)第三者責(zé)任法定保險(xiǎn)暫行規(guī)定[J];云南政報(bào);1993年10期

5 顧毓璽;《道路交通事故處理辦法》有待修訂[J];上海保險(xiǎn);1996年06期

6 ;北京新交法凸顯八大變化[J];現(xiàn)代鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn);2004年Z3期

7 田松濤;;對(duì)機(jī)動(dòng)車(chē)第三者責(zé)任強(qiáng)制保險(xiǎn)賠付制度的思考[J];科技信息(科學(xué)教研);2007年17期

8 范仕源;車(chē)保:第三者責(zé)任強(qiáng)制保險(xiǎn)[J];安全與健康;2004年08期

9 薛斐;;試析“車(chē)上人員”與“第三者”的轉(zhuǎn)化問(wèn)題[J];青年與社會(huì);2013年10期

10 梁天基;完善機(jī)動(dòng)車(chē)第三者責(zé)任強(qiáng)制保險(xiǎn)制度芻議[J];廣西醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年S1期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前6條

1 魏小燕;;機(jī)動(dòng)車(chē)第三者責(zé)任強(qiáng)制保險(xiǎn)中的法律糾紛問(wèn)題[A];浙江省2013年保險(xiǎn)法學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2013年

2 楊麗英;;論涼山彝族習(xí)慣法與等級(jí)婚姻關(guān)系[A];全國(guó)外國(guó)法制史研究會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)叢書(shū)——多元的法律文化[C];2006年

3 韓布新;;基督教傳統(tǒng)下的家庭與婚姻關(guān)系[A];增強(qiáng)心理學(xué)服務(wù)社會(huì)的意識(shí)和功能——中國(guó)心理學(xué)會(huì)成立90周年紀(jì)念大會(huì)暨第十四屆全國(guó)心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文摘要集[C];2011年

4 張姝s，

本文編號(hào)：2143359