本文選題：家庭暴力 + 社會性別��； 參考：《贛南師范學(xué)院》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：第一部分為引論,主要闡述本文的研究內(nèi)容、研究目的、研究意義、研究視角和研究對象,并對國內(nèi)外研究狀況進(jìn)行述評。社會性別主流化強(qiáng)調(diào)制定政策、法律條文時,必須綜合考慮對男女的不同影響,從而實現(xiàn)男女平等目標(biāo)。我國法律對家庭暴力作了相關(guān)規(guī)定,對保護(hù)受害人起到了重要作用。從社會性別視角來看,家庭暴力體現(xiàn)為男性對女性的權(quán)力與控制,這是群體性的而不是個體性的男女不平等問題。因此,在社會性別主流化的大背景下,以社會性別的分析方法來分析和解構(gòu)我國的反家庭暴力立法,不僅能更有利地保護(hù)受害人,而且通過公平公正的立法能達(dá)到兩性實質(zhì)平等的目的。第二部分主要闡述家庭暴力的社會性別運(yùn)行機(jī)制。不平等的社會性別是造成家庭暴力的根本原因。社會性別運(yùn)行機(jī)制是由社會性別中的社會性別角色、社會性別氣質(zhì)、社會資源分配、社會性別觀念和社會性別評價等各要素相互作用而形成的一整套限制兩性行為方式的綜合體。通過這個性別機(jī)制,可以發(fā)現(xiàn),男性對女性的暴力并不是個體原因,而是社會性別導(dǎo)致兩性關(guān)系的不平等。第三部分對現(xiàn)行反家庭暴力法進(jìn)行社會性別解構(gòu)。以社會性別的理論來審視我國《反家庭暴力法》,有利于分析其在立法目的、家庭暴力概念、人身安全保護(hù)令上的社會性別構(gòu)造,論證其社會性別意識的缺失,以為立法完善提供參考。其一,在立法目的上,將預(yù)防和制止家庭暴力、保護(hù)家庭成員的合法權(quán)益作為立法目的,有利于打破傳統(tǒng)規(guī)范中“家國同構(gòu)”、“家庭利益至上”的觀念。其二,在家庭暴力概念上,對家庭暴力類型的定義相較以往具有進(jìn)步性,它將精神暴力涵蓋進(jìn)來,但是對性暴力仍然沒有相關(guān)規(guī)定;對家庭暴力主體的定義帶有性別歧視,它沒有將同性戀者囊括在“共同生活”的人群中,這對同性戀者的權(quán)利保護(hù)是不利的。其三,在人身安全保護(hù)令上,創(chuàng)造性地提出了保護(hù)措施,該種人身安全保護(hù)令的設(shè)置體現(xiàn)了對弱勢群體的保護(hù),保護(hù)受害人的權(quán)益是矯正正義與分配正義價值理念的體現(xiàn)。第四部分就社會性別主流化下的反家庭暴力立法提出完善建議。為了更好地規(guī)制家庭暴力行為與救助家庭暴力受害者,我國《反家庭暴力法》必須以社會性別建構(gòu)為基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行完善。對我國反家庭暴力立法的社會性別構(gòu)建在于:其一,在立法目的上,堅持?jǐn)P棄以家庭為本位而應(yīng)以受害人為本位。其二,在家庭暴力概念上,將性暴力涵蓋在家庭暴力中,使婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸入罪以實現(xiàn)婦女權(quán)益在公領(lǐng)域與私領(lǐng)域的平等保護(hù),將同性戀者囊括在家庭暴力主體內(nèi)。其三,在法律責(zé)任上,應(yīng)優(yōu)化人身安全保護(hù)令的審理和執(zhí)行措施,將家庭暴力的民事責(zé)任類型化、具體化,對犯罪行為實行公訴與自訴相結(jié)合的訴訟規(guī)則和更嚴(yán)格的證據(jù)規(guī)則。
[Abstract]:The first part is the introduction, mainly expounds the research content, the research purpose, the research significance, the research angle and the research object, and carries on the commentary to the domestic and foreign research situation. Gender mainstreaming emphasizes the development of policies and legal texts that take into account the differential impact on men and women in order to achieve the goal of equality between men and women. The law of our country has made the related stipulation to the domestic violence, has played the important role to protect the victim. From the perspective of gender, domestic violence embodies the power and control of men over women, which is a problem of group rather than individual inequality between men and women. Therefore, in the context of gender mainstreaming, the analysis and deconstruction of anti-domestic violence legislation in China with the method of gender analysis can not only protect the victims more advantageously. And through fair and just legislation can achieve the goal of substantive equality between the two sexes. The second part mainly expounds the gender operation mechanism of domestic violence. Unequal gender is the root cause of domestic violence. The gender operation mechanism is composed of gender roles, gender temperament, and social resources distribution. Gender concept and gender evaluation and other factors interact to form a set of constraints on gender behavior. Through this gender mechanism, it can be found that male violence against women is not an individual cause, but gender inequality. The third part carries on the social gender deconstruction to the current anti-domestic violence law. It is helpful to analyze the social gender structure in the legislative purpose, the concept of domestic violence, the personal security protection order, and to demonstrate the lack of gender consciousness of the anti-domestic violence law from the theory of social gender, which is helpful to the analysis of its legislative purpose, the concept of domestic violence, and the order of personal safety protection. To provide reference for legislative perfection. Firstly, the legislative purpose is to prevent and stop domestic violence and protect the legitimate rights and interests of family members, which is helpful to break the traditional norms of "homogeneity" and "family interests first". Second, in the concept of domestic violence, the definition of the type of domestic violence is more progressive than before, it covers mental violence, but there is still no relevant provisions on sexual violence; the definition of the subject of domestic violence is sexist. It does not include homosexuals in the "live together" population, which is detrimental to the protection of gay rights. Third, in the personal security protection order, creatively put forward the protection measures, the establishment of this kind of personal security protection order reflects the protection of the vulnerable groups, the protection of the rights and interests of the victims is the correct justice and distribution of justice value. The fourth part puts forward some suggestions on anti-domestic violence legislation under gender mainstreaming. In order to better regulate domestic violence and help victims of domestic violence, the Anti-Family violence Law in China must be perfected on the basis of gender construction. The gender construction of anti-domestic violence legislation in China lies in the following aspects: firstly, in the legislative purpose, we should abandon the family as the standard and take the victim as the standard. Secondly, in the concept of domestic violence, sexual violence is covered in domestic violence, and marital rape is criminalized in order to realize equal protection of women's rights and interests in the public and private fields, and homosexuals are included in the subject of domestic violence. Third, in the aspect of legal liability, we should optimize the trial and execution measures of personal security protection order, classify and concretize the civil liability of domestic violence, and implement the rules of litigation and more strict rules of evidence for criminal acts which are combined with public prosecution and private prosecution.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：贛南師范學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D923.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 錢海飛;;公安機(jī)關(guān):保護(hù)人身安全最重要[J];人民公安;2016年05期

2 周安平;;《反家庭暴力法》亟須解決的幾個問題——對《反家庭暴力法(草案)》的分析[J];婦女研究論叢;2015年02期

3 張強(qiáng);陳虹;;從社會性別視角解讀夫妻間家庭暴力問題[J];內(nèi)蒙古醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報;2014年S2期

4 夏吟蘭;;家庭暴力概念中的主體范圍分析[J];婦女研究論叢;2014年05期

5 冀祥德;;婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸入罪正當(dāng)化分析[J];婦女研究論叢;2014年05期

6 李明舜;;制定反家暴法需要正確處理的幾個基本問題[J];婦女研究論叢;2014年05期

7 暢引婷;許英;邸曉星;;社會性別觀念與婦女地位的關(guān)系探討[J];太原理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2013年04期

8 王禮仁;;我國家庭暴力內(nèi)涵的立法定位與構(gòu)想——以家庭暴力類型化分析為視角[J];中華女子學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年04期

9 陳明俠;;制定家庭暴力防治法的基本原則[J];婦女研究論叢;2012年03期

10 何麗新;;述評臺灣民事保護(hù)令制度之最新發(fā)展[J];臺灣研究;2009年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 秦志遠(yuǎn);論基于性別的家庭暴力的民法規(guī)制[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 陳姝穎;社會性別與家庭暴力[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2007年

2 陳靜;論婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：2093337