本文選題：婚姻 + 重婚罪��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2006年碩士論文

【摘要】：家庭是人生的搖籃，也是社會的細胞�，F(xiàn)代家庭以一夫一妻制為結(jié)構(gòu)主體，乃是人類進化的理性選擇，也是人類社會文明的標志。重婚，是婚姻中的違法行為，與一夫一妻制的現(xiàn)代文明婚姻制度水火不容。世界各主要國家在立法上均有禁止重婚的規(guī)定。我國刑法規(guī)定的重婚罪對于維護一夫一妻制的婚姻家庭制度，也曾起到一定的積極作用。 然而，隨著人們法律意識的覺醒，明目張膽地登記重婚的已微乎其微，重婚罪已并沒有多大適用余地。反之，“包二奶”現(xiàn)象卻日趨猖獗，不論是法律或道德的約束，還是輿論抨擊，“包二奶”仍是濤聲依舊，有增無減。而刑法規(guī)定的重婚罪卻對此無能為力。此外，刑事司法實踐中認可的事實重婚也頗有爭議。這些都啟示筆者對我國刑法規(guī)定的重婚罪的必要性、合理性予以重新審視。筆者竊以為，我國刑法規(guī)定的重婚罪已喪失其合理性及必要性，可以予以非犯罪化，應(yīng)當重新構(gòu)建防控重婚的法律體系和社會體系。 本文從婚姻制度的歷史演變、婚姻的本質(zhì)、事實婚姻的效力等入手，對重婚及重婚罪予以界定，并反思重婚的社會危害性。隨后，筆者結(jié)合非犯罪化思想和刑法的謙抑性理論，論證重婚行為可予以非犯罪化，并針對重婚行為非犯罪化后，如何有效地防控重婚、保護受害人，提出若干建議。 本文共分九個部分： 一、序言。該部分主要介紹筆者寫作的動因以及筆者主張對重婚罪非犯罪化的觀點。 二、婚姻概說。該部分從婚姻制度的歷史演變?nèi)胧�，推演出一夫一妻制是人類社會文明的標志，重婚與其水火不容。繼而，筆者討論了婚姻的概念及本質(zhì)，提出婚姻是男女兩性依照法律規(guī)定自愿結(jié)合而產(chǎn)生的夫妻關(guān)系，，明確婚姻的本質(zhì)屬性是其社會屬性和法律屬性。因而，事實婚姻并不是一種婚姻。 三、重婚與重婚罪。該部分從重婚的概念著手，首先界定民事范疇的重婚，應(yīng)該排除事實婚姻。繼而，筆者參考世界各主要國家關(guān)于重婚罪的規(guī)定，對重婚罪的界定及犯罪構(gòu)成作了探討，并認為重婚罪也應(yīng)該排除事實婚姻，只有登記婚才可以構(gòu)成重婚罪。 四、重婚社會危害性反思。該部分從犯罪的本質(zhì)入手，明確犯罪是具
[Abstract]:Family is the cradle of life, but also the cells of society. Monogamy is the main structure of modern family, which is the rational choice of human evolution and the symbol of human civilization. Bigamy is an illegal act in marriage, which is incompatible with the modern civilized marriage system of monogamy. Major countries in the world have laws prohibiting bigamy. The crime of bigamy stipulated in our country's criminal law has also played a positive role in maintaining the monogamous marriage and family system. However, with the awakening of people's legal consciousness, very few people have openly registered bigamy. Bigamy does not have much room for application. On the other hand, the phenomenon of "keeping concubines" is increasingly rampant. Whether it is the restriction of law or morality, or the criticism of public opinion, the sound of "keeping concubines" is still increasing. But the crime of bigamy stipulated in the criminal law is powerless. In addition, the fact of bigamy recognized in criminal justice practice is also controversial. All these enlighten the author to re-examine the necessity and rationality of bigamy in our criminal law. The author thinks that the bigamy crime stipulated in our criminal law has lost its rationality and necessity and can be decriminalized, and the legal system and social system of bigamy prevention and control should be re-established. This paper defines bigamy and bigamy crime and reflects on the social harmfulness of bigamy. Then, combining with the decriminalization thought and the modest theory of criminal law, the author demonstrates that bigamy can be decriminalized, and how to effectively prevent and control bigamy and protect the victim after decriminalizing bigamy. This paper is divided into nine parts: first, preface. This part mainly introduces the motivation of the author's writing and the author's viewpoint of decriminalization of bigamy. Starting from the historical evolution of marriage system, this part deduces that monogamy is the symbol of human civilization, bigamy and its incompatibility. Then, the author discusses the concept and essence of marriage, and puts forward that marriage is the relationship between husband and wife that men and women combine voluntarily in accordance with the law, and it is clear that the essential attribute of marriage is its social attribute and legal attribute. Thus, de facto marriage is not a marriage. Third, bigamy and bigamy. This part starts with the concept of bigamy, first defines the civil bigamy, and should exclude the de facto marriage. Then, referring to the provisions of major countries in the world on bigamy, the author probes into the definition and constitution of bigamy, and thinks that bigamy should also be excluded from de facto marriage, and that only registered marriage can constitute bigamy. Reflection on the social harmfulness of bigamy. This part starts with the essence of crime and makes it clear that crime is a kind of crime.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號】：D924.3;D923.9

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳曉敏;;裸婚——80后的婚姻救贖?[J];中國報道;2011年08期

2 ;政策·法律[J];農(nóng)家女;2011年08期

3 劉挺;;80后婚姻，不按常理出牌[J];黃金時代;2008年03期

4 高亞飛;;論我國夫妻日常家事代理權(quán)制度的構(gòu)建[J];法制與社會;2011年26期

5 范文韜;潘榮華;;淺析當代“假離婚”現(xiàn)象[J];法制與社會;2011年26期

6 劉紹棠;;我的婚姻“土洋結(jié)合”[J];老同志之友;2011年12期

7 孫立梅;;夫妻學(xué)會“吵架”才能幸福[J];中華養(yǎng)生保健;2011年09期

8 李小英;;家庭 婚姻 幸�！獪\析家庭文化建設(shè)[J];湖北農(nóng)村金融研究;2005年06期

9 刁其懷;;詢問共有人還是審核婚姻關(guān)系——習(xí)慣不能代替法規(guī)[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2011年07期

10 顏士州;;挽救婚姻,從學(xué)習(xí)性愛開始[J];健康生活;2011年07期

相關(guān)會議論文 前10條

1 李惠;褚琰;;試析重婚罪的構(gòu)成[A];貴州省2004年刑法學(xué)年會論文集[C];2004年

2 劉勤學(xué);方曉義;池培蓮;;夫妻關(guān)系標準及相似性的特點研究[A];第十一屆全國心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會議論文摘要集[C];2007年

3 金東賢;;婚姻關(guān)系、親子關(guān)系對3～6歲幼兒心理行為問題的影響[A];第十屆全國心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)大會論文摘要集[C];2005年

4 張渝;王佳;;清代占里侗族婚姻習(xí)慣法研究[A];民族法學(xué)評論（第6卷·2008年）[C];2008年

5 郭獻輝;;百崎回族的通婚圈[A];惠安民俗研討會論文集[C];1992年

6 張姝s

本文編號：1987620