本文選題：婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸 + 強(qiáng)奸罪�。� 參考：《中國政法大學(xué)》2006年碩士論文

【摘要】：婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸問題并不是一個(gè)新鮮的問題，早在九十年代初，上海青浦縣人民法院的一份判決就引發(fā)了學(xué)術(shù)界的一場(chǎng)軒然大波，對(duì)于婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸的歸罪問題的討論可謂是如火如荼，十幾年來，學(xué)界兩派各持己見、相持不下，，這種爭(zhēng)論也給司法實(shí)踐帶來了困惑，罪與非似乎應(yīng)該有個(gè)定論，然而，今年“三八”前夕，社科學(xué)院發(fā)布《中國婦女發(fā)展報(bào)告》披露，在《婚姻法》和《婦女法》修改討論過程中，“婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸”都是熱門話題，但最終兩度被棄。由此可見，理論上的爭(zhēng)論讓立法者難下決心，而立法上的回避卻讓司法實(shí)踐仍然面臨尷尬，畢竟，司法實(shí)踐是無法回避這一問題的。特別是今天，婦女解放運(yùn)動(dòng)不斷發(fā)展，越來越多的婦女不再逆來受順，家庭暴力愈來愈受到社會(huì)的關(guān)注和重視，婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸早已不是家庭問題而是一個(gè)社會(huì)問題。本文旨在對(duì)婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸行為的概念、社會(huì)原因的分析，并利用比較法分析法討論了域外婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸法的發(fā)展，對(duì)這種學(xué)說的利弊分析，總結(jié)出這樣的觀點(diǎn)：在我國立法上將婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸歸罪是必要的和可行的。 論文分為四個(gè)部分展開論述。 我們研究任何一個(gè)問題，都必須首先在理論上弄清楚它的基本概念和特征。為了闡述清楚婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸的概念，文章第一部分分別從主客觀方面和主客體方面討論了婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸行為與強(qiáng)奸罪的異同點(diǎn)。在主體上，文章著重討論了第三人參與是否構(gòu)成犯罪的問題；客體上，二者是相同的；在主觀方面和客觀方面，二者是存在差異的。然后文章分析了我國婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸發(fā)生的社會(huì)原因，分別從歷史因素、個(gè)體因素、社會(huì)因素、法律因素等幾個(gè)方面進(jìn)行了分析。 文章第二部分主要介紹了國外一些國家和地區(qū)關(guān)于婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸定性的狀況分析，英美法系國家主要介紹了英國和美國的婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸概況，大陸法系國家主要介紹了德國、法國、意大利、俄羅斯以及我國的香港臺(tái)灣等地的概況。最后通過比較分析，得出的結(jié)論是，國外一些國家在婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸的認(rèn)定這個(gè)問題上大概經(jīng)歷了一個(gè)從否定到承認(rèn)的過程，隨著諸多國家通過立法承認(rèn)婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸，這已經(jīng)成為了國際立法趨勢(shì)，這不僅是女權(quán)運(yùn)動(dòng)發(fā)展的結(jié)果，也是世界婦女人權(quán)保障的必然趨勢(shì)。
[Abstract]:The issue of marital rape is not a new one. As early as the early 1990s, a judgment issued by the Qingpu County people's Court in Shanghai caused a great uproar in the academic community. The discussion on the issue of incrimination of marital rape can be said to be in full swing. For more than a decade, the two schools of academia have held their own views and held each other at loggerheads. This kind of argument has also brought confusion to judicial practice. It seems that there should be a conclusion between crime and non-crime. However, on the eve of "8 March" this year, According to the China Women's Development report released by the Institute of Social Sciences, "marital rape" was a hot topic in the course of the revision and discussion of the Marriage Law and the Women's Law, but was abandoned twice. It can be seen that the theoretical argument makes the legislators difficult to make up their minds, but the legislative avoidance still makes the judicial practice face embarrassment. After all, the judicial practice cannot avoid this problem. Especially today, with the continuous development of the women's liberation movement, more and more women are no longer subject to obedience, and domestic violence has been paid more and more attention by the society. Marital rape is no longer a family problem but a social problem. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the concept and social causes of marital rape, and to discuss the development of marital rape law in foreign countries by means of comparative analysis, and to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of this theory. The conclusion is that it is necessary and feasible to condemn marital rape in Chinese legislation. The thesis is divided into four parts. When we study any problem, we must first understand its basic concepts and characteristics in theory. In order to clarify the concept of marital rape, the first part discusses the similarities and differences between marital rape and rape. On the subject, the article mainly discusses whether the participation of the third party constitutes a crime; the object, the two are the same; in the subjective and objective aspects, there are differences between the two. Then the article analyzes the social causes of marital rape in China, respectively from the historical factors, individual factors, social factors, legal factors and other aspects of the analysis. The second part of the article mainly introduces some foreign countries and regions on marital rape qualitative analysis, Anglo-American law countries mainly introduced the United Kingdom and the United States marital rape, civil law countries mainly introduced Germany, France, An overview of Italy, Russia and Hong Kong and Taiwan. Finally, through comparative analysis, the conclusion is that some foreign countries have probably experienced a process from negation to recognition on the issue of marital rape, with many countries adopting legislation to recognize marital rape. This has become the trend of international legislation, which is not only the result of the development of feminist movement, but also the inevitable trend of the protection of women's human rights in the world.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號(hào)】：D923;D924.3

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王曉紅;反家庭暴力法律問題研究[D];四川大學(xué);2007年

2 閆文新;女性配偶權(quán)益弱化的私法救濟(jì)[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2010年

3 李冬梅;強(qiáng)奸罪若干問題研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：1960772