發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-31 03:53

  本文選題：居住權(quán) + 人役權(quán)�。� 參考：《沈陽師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：2002年居住權(quán)制度第一次出現(xiàn)在《中華人民共和國物權(quán)法（征求意見稿）》中，在2006年8月22日舉行的十屆全國人大常委會(huì)第二十三次會(huì)議聽取了法律委員會(huì)的匯報(bào)意見后被刪除。法律委員會(huì)認(rèn)為，居住權(quán)的適用面很窄，基于家庭關(guān)系的居住權(quán)問題婚姻家庭法有關(guān)撫養(yǎng)、贍養(yǎng)等規(guī)定，基于租賃關(guān)系的居住權(quán)問題適用合同法有關(guān)法律的規(guī)定，這些情形都不適用草案關(guān)于居住權(quán)的規(guī)定。本文通過對(duì)居住權(quán)制度性質(zhì)、特點(diǎn)及其在諸多國家歷史沿革過程的考察，發(fā)現(xiàn)該制度的性質(zhì)與功能并不是一層不變的，隨著時(shí)代的發(fā)展居住權(quán)制度也在不斷的進(jìn)行自我完善，逐步從原有的人身依附性權(quán)利轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)橐环N契約性權(quán)利，其功能也從原有單一的弱者生存保障功能發(fā)展為兼具保障弱勢(shì)群體基本權(quán)益和價(jià)值分離、促進(jìn)財(cái)富流通功能的綜合性制度。脫離人役權(quán)制度體系，我國物權(quán)法依然有單獨(dú)制定居住權(quán)制度的土壤。居住權(quán)制度的否定者對(duì)于該制度的認(rèn)識(shí)存在一定偏差，其功能無法為其他制度所替代，在我國物權(quán)法體系下設(shè)立該制度十分必要。由于種種原因居住權(quán)制度在我國一直未被承認(rèn)，對(duì)于我國仍是一個(gè)全新的制度，從歷史源流及制度體系來看，世界上大部分規(guī)定了居住權(quán)制度的國家都有完備詳細(xì)的人役權(quán)制度基礎(chǔ)，居住權(quán)作為人役權(quán)的下位制度加以界定，其理論基礎(chǔ)和法條設(shè)定相對(duì)簡(jiǎn)單，即使在居住權(quán)部分的規(guī)定出現(xiàn)漏洞，也可以借助上位制度的相關(guān)規(guī)定作為兜底條款。對(duì)于我國來說，由于人役權(quán)制度的缺失，居住權(quán)制度在設(shè)定和運(yùn)行過程中沒有相關(guān)參考，所以在立法時(shí)要盡量做到詳細(xì)充分，《物權(quán)法》草案中用8條內(nèi)容對(duì)居住權(quán)作出規(guī)定，雖然有“開創(chuàng)先河”的重要地位，但其效果和力度仍是遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不夠的。所以在制度設(shè)立時(shí)應(yīng)盡量做到詳細(xì)具體且為法律的后續(xù)規(guī)定留有余地，同時(shí)應(yīng)盡量與現(xiàn)有制度協(xié)調(diào)一致，以求全方位多角度的實(shí)現(xiàn)居住權(quán)制度的價(jià)值。因此應(yīng)盡快在物權(quán)法體系下建立健全居住權(quán)制度，在制度的具體設(shè)定上盡量做到詳細(xì)，又要為法律的后續(xù)配套工作留有一定余地，同時(shí)配合《婚姻法》、《未成年人保護(hù)法》、《婦女兒童保護(hù)法》及社會(huì)保障制度的相關(guān)規(guī)定全方位、多角度的完善對(duì)于居住權(quán)的保護(hù)工作，使這一“古老”而又“全新“的制度在我國充分實(shí)現(xiàn)其價(jià)值，為我國各項(xiàng)事業(yè)的發(fā)展貢獻(xiàn)一份力量。
[Abstract]:In 2002, the right of abode system appeared for the first time in the Law of the people's Republic of China on Real Rights (draft for opinions). It was deleted after hearing the report of the Law Committee at the 23rd meeting of the standing Committee of the Tenth National people's Congress held on August 22, 2006. According to the Law Committee, the scope of application of the right of residence is very narrow, the issue of residence rights based on family relations is a matter of marriage and family law, and the provisions of the law on maintenance and maintenance apply to the issue of residence rights based on the lease relationship. None of these cases applies to the provisions of the draft concerning the right of abode. Based on the investigation of the nature and characteristics of the residence right system and its historical evolution in many countries, this paper finds that the nature and function of this system are not the same, and with the development of the times, the residence right system is constantly improving itself. Gradually from the original right of personal attachment to a contractual right, its function has also developed from the original function of the survival of the weak to the protection of the basic rights and interests of vulnerable groups and the separation of value. A comprehensive system that promotes the function of wealth circulation. Apart from the system of personal servitude, Chinese real right law still has the soil to establish the residence right system separately. The negators of the right of residence system have a certain deviation to the understanding of this system, its function can not be replaced by other systems, it is very necessary to set up the system under the system of property law of our country. For a variety of reasons, the right of abode system has not been recognized in our country. It is still a new system for our country. From the perspective of historical origin and institutional system, Most of the countries in the world that have stipulated the system of residence right have a complete and detailed foundation of the system of servitude, and the right of residence is defined as the inferior system of the right of servitude, and its theoretical basis and legal provisions are relatively simple. Even if there are loopholes in the provisions of the right of abode, we can also use the relevant provisions of the upper system as the bottom clause. For our country, because of the absence of the system of servitude, there is no relevant reference in the course of the establishment and operation of the right of residence system, so we should try our best to make full and detailed legislation on the right of residence in the draft of "Real right". Although there is an important position of "pioneering", its effect and strength are still far from enough. Therefore, when the system is established, it should be as detailed and specific as possible and leave room for the subsequent provisions of the law. At the same time, it should be coordinated with the existing system as much as possible, in order to realize the value of the residence right system from all directions and many angles. Therefore, we should establish and perfect the residence right system under the real right law system as soon as possible, do as much detail as possible on the specific setting of the system, and leave some leeway for the subsequent supporting work of the law. At the same time, in cooperation with the Marriage Law, the Law on Protection of minors, the Law on Protection of Women and Children, and the relevant provisions of the social security system, the protection of the right of residence should be improved from various angles. Make this "old" and "brand-new" system fully realize its value in our country, and contribute to the development of our country's various undertakings.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 崔向萌;;淺析居住權(quán)制度及在我國構(gòu)建之必要[J];傳承;2010年12期

2 歐陽麗芬;;居住權(quán)合理性問題探討[J];新學(xué)術(shù);2006年01期

3 楊玉凱;;物權(quán)法中居住權(quán)法律制度研究[J];遼寧法治研究;2007年03期

4 陰秀文;;論物權(quán)法中居住權(quán)制度的設(shè)立[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年35期

5 楊柳;李衛(wèi)華;;論物權(quán)法中的居住權(quán)[J];桂林航天工業(yè)高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

6 李穎;;物權(quán)法中的居住權(quán)制度理論分析[J];廊坊師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期

7 蔣懿;;對(duì)我國居住權(quán)立法的思考[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2006年05期

8 柯慈愛;;愛在黃昏的財(cái)產(chǎn)處理[J];老同志之友;2011年04期

9 丁韶東;俞德鵬;;試論我國物權(quán)法居住權(quán)之拋棄[J];寧波經(jīng)濟(jì)(三江論壇);2008年03期

10 陳琦;;關(guān)于在我國物權(quán)法中設(shè)置居住權(quán)問題之我見[J];科技經(jīng)濟(jì)市場(chǎng);2006年12期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 沈福俊;;城市群租者的居住權(quán)保護(hù)問題分析[A];中國法學(xué)會(huì)行政法學(xué)研究會(huì)2010年會(huì)論文集[C];2010年

2 劉正才;;對(duì)當(dāng)前我國住房調(diào)控政策的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)思考[A];上海市經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)年刊（2006）[C];2007年

3 張鳳榮;;開發(fā)利用農(nóng)民宅基地,城鄉(xiāng)共建“工農(nóng)一家式農(nóng)村別墅”[A];2009年中國土地學(xué)會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2009年

4 李二福;;完善政策性住房體系保障中低收入者居住權(quán)[A];節(jié)能環(huán)保 和諧發(fā)展——2007中國科協(xié)年會(huì)論文集（二）[C];2007年

5 李國華;傅鼎生;陸燕;梁曼;程虹;劉q，

本文編號(hào)：1958181