本文選題：離婚 + 監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)�。� 參考：《北京化工大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 父母離婚之后,父母子女間的權(quán)利義務(wù)(本文指父母對(duì)未成年子女的監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán))內(nèi)容仍同于從前,包括人身監(jiān)護(hù)和財(cái)產(chǎn)監(jiān)護(hù)。但是,離婚后父母分開(kāi)居住,父母對(duì)未成年子女的監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)的歸屬情況和行使情況也發(fā)生相應(yīng)變化。離婚后,父母對(duì)未成年子女的監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)的歸屬存在兩種模式：?jiǎn)为?dú)享有監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)模式和共同享有監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)模式；父母對(duì)未成年子女的監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)的行使存在三種模式：?jiǎn)为?dú)行使監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)模式、共同行使監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)模式和第三人行使監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)模式。本文研究重點(diǎn)為離婚后父母對(duì)未成年子女的監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)的行使模式。主要內(nèi)容如下： 第一章：父母對(duì)未成年子女的監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)概述。本章介紹了監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)的歷史發(fā)展情況,對(duì)監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)的歸屬模式和行使模式進(jìn)行區(qū)分,并厘清兩者間的關(guān)系。 第二章：?jiǎn)为?dú)行使監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)模式。本章對(duì)該模式下直接撫養(yǎng)人的確定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和間接撫養(yǎng)人的權(quán)利義務(wù)這兩個(gè)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行研究。針對(duì)前一問(wèn)題,筆者從歷史發(fā)展角度對(duì)直接撫養(yǎng)人的確定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行分析,分別介紹了父權(quán)優(yōu)先原則、幼年原則、主要照顧者原則和兒童利益最大化原則。針對(duì)后一問(wèn)題,筆者主要分析了間接撫養(yǎng)人的兩項(xiàng)權(quán)利義務(wù)：探望權(quán)和監(jiān)督權(quán)。 第三章：共同行使監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)模式。在簡(jiǎn)單介紹了該模式的概念和發(fā)展史后,筆者主要分析了該模式的適用條件,包括積極條件和消極條件。共同行使監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)模式可分為三種類型：共同監(jiān)護(hù)、分配監(jiān)護(hù)和分割監(jiān)護(hù)。上述三種類型各有特點(diǎn),具有各自的適用條件。筆者還將我國(guó)《子女撫養(yǎng)意見(jiàn)》中規(guī)定的輪流撫養(yǎng)模式與分配監(jiān)護(hù)進(jìn)行比較分析,指出我國(guó)立法對(duì)輪流撫養(yǎng)模式規(guī)定的不足之處并提出相關(guān)修改意見(jiàn)。 第四章：第三人行使監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)模式。本章重點(diǎn)分析該模式的三個(gè)適用條件,包括未成年子女的父母不適合或不愿意行使監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)、第三人的監(jiān)護(hù)資格和未成年子女的意愿等。筆者還分析了該模式在中國(guó)應(yīng)用的可行性和必要性。 在總結(jié)前文研究和論述的基礎(chǔ)上,本文提出以下立法建議：1.應(yīng)當(dāng)明確區(qū)分離婚后父母對(duì)未成年子女的監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)的歸屬模式和行使模式；2.應(yīng)該明確規(guī)定,離婚后由父母雙方共同享有對(duì)未成年子女的監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)；3.應(yīng)該明確規(guī)定,對(duì)離婚后未成年子女的監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)相關(guān)問(wèn)題的處理應(yīng)符合兒童利益最大化原則,并列舉一些具體參考因素；4.應(yīng)明確規(guī)定離婚后父母對(duì)未成年子女的監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)存在三種行使模式：?jiǎn)为?dú)行使監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)模式,共同行使監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)模式和第三人行使監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)模式。與此同時(shí),還應(yīng)規(guī)定這些模式的適用條件。
[Abstract]:After the divorce of parents, the rights and obligations between parents and children (this article refers to the custody of minor children) are still the same as before, including personal custody and property custody. However, after divorce, parents live separately, and the status and exercise of parental custody of minor children change accordingly. After divorce, there are two types of parental custody of minor children: separate guardianship and joint guardianship; There are three modes of parental guardianship over minor children: sole guardianship, joint guardianship and third party guardianship. This paper focuses on the exercise of parental custody of minor children after divorce. The main contents are as follows: Chapter 1: an overview of parental custody of minor children. This chapter introduces the historical development of guardianship, differentiates the mode of ownership and exercise of guardianship, and clarifies the relationship between them. Chapter II: individual exercise of guardianship model. This chapter studies the determination standard of direct dependant and the rights and obligations of indirect dependant. In view of the former problem, the author analyzes the criteria of direct dependant from the angle of historical development, and introduces the principle of paternity priority, the principle of infancy, the principle of main caretaker and the principle of maximizing the interests of children. Aiming at the latter problem, the author mainly analyzes two rights and obligations of indirect dependents: visitation right and supervision right. Chapter III: joint exercise of guardianship model. After a brief introduction of the concept and history of the model, the author mainly analyzes the applicable conditions of the model, including positive conditions and negative conditions. The mode of joint guardianship can be divided into three types: joint guardianship, distributed guardianship and divided guardianship. The above three types have their own characteristics and have their own applicable conditions. The author also makes a comparative analysis of the pattern of rotation and distribution of guardianship in the opinion of Child support in China, points out the deficiencies of the legislation of our country on the pattern of rotational maintenance and puts forward some relevant amendments. Chapter IV: the third party exercise custody mode. This chapter focuses on the analysis of the three applicable conditions of the model, including the parents of minor children are unsuitable or unwilling to exercise guardianship, the third party's guardianship qualification and the will of minor children, and so on. The author also analyzes the feasibility and necessity of applying this model in China. On the basis of summing up the previous research and discussion, this paper puts forward the following legislative proposals: 1. A clear distinction should be made between the mode of attribution and exercise of parental custody of minor children after divorce. It should be made clear that after divorce, both parents share custody of minor children. It should be made clear that the treatment of custody of minor children after divorce should be in line with the principle of maximizing the interests of the child, and list some specific reference factors. There should be three types of exercise of parental custody of minor children after divorce: sole exercise, joint exercise and third party. At the same time, conditions for the application of these models should also be specified.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京化工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 陳葦;王濵;;澳大利亞兒童權(quán)益保護(hù)立法評(píng)介及其對(duì)我國(guó)立法的啟示——以家庭法和子女撫養(yǎng)(評(píng)估)法為研究對(duì)象[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

2 樊麗君;我國(guó)婚姻法建立親權(quán)制度的理論研究[J];陜西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年02期

3 蔡秋紅;;城市核心家庭親子關(guān)系和諧狀況研究[J];中華女子學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 陳于寧;親權(quán)法律制度研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2001年

2 龔毅夫;離異家庭未成年子女財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)利研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2005年

3 劉文文;論我國(guó)的探望權(quán)制度及其完善[D];南京師范大學(xué);2007年

4 馬雪平;關(guān)于我國(guó)親權(quán)制度的探析[D];蘭州大學(xué);2007年

5 張游美;論監(jiān)護(hù)制度[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2007年

6 谷景志;論離婚親子關(guān)系中的兒童最大利益原則[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

7 郭靜;親權(quán)制度研究[D];河南大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1877278