本文選題：親屬法 + 價值取向　； 參考：《遼寧師范大學》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：親屬法是規(guī)定親屬身份的發(fā)生、變更和消滅,以及夫妻、父母子女和其他一定范圍的親屬之間身份關(guān)系、權(quán)利和義務的法律規(guī)范的總和。親屬法調(diào)整對象包括親屬人身關(guān)系和親屬財產(chǎn)關(guān)系。國家除了通過制定親屬法來調(diào)整上述親屬間的社會關(guān)系之外,還向社會傳達能夠被廣泛認同和接受的價值原則和價值追求,因此,親屬法的立法價值取向的選擇對于判斷一部法律是否是良法,是否能夠促進家庭及社會的和諧、穩(wěn)定起到了重要作用。從這個意義上說,本論文的選題富含理論價值和實踐意義。就理論價值而言,對親屬法立法價值取向的梳理和研究,在一定程度上可以彌補對親屬法基本理論重視不夠、研究不足的局面。從實踐價值層面而言,眾所周知,立法價值取向的選擇是制定一部法律的首要步驟,正確的立法價值取向不僅關(guān)乎一部法律對社會的調(diào)整和對人們行為的規(guī)范,更對加速我國法治建設的進程以及對社會的和諧、穩(wěn)定起到了舉足輕重的作用。因此,對于親屬法立法價值取向出現(xiàn)的偏離、異化的現(xiàn)狀應當引起足夠的重視,遏制這種現(xiàn)象的發(fā)展和蔓延,更好地協(xié)調(diào)個人利益和家庭整體利益的相互關(guān)系,保證家庭職能的實現(xiàn),維護家庭的和諧、穩(wěn)定、幸福,促進社會的和諧穩(wěn)定、繁榮發(fā)展。因此,針對當前親屬法立法價值取向出現(xiàn)的偏差和異化現(xiàn)狀進行矯正是十分必要的�；趯�1950年、1980年婚姻法立法價值取向的實然狀態(tài)進行分析,可以看出隨著我國社會的不斷進步,改革發(fā)展的不斷深化,每一次婚姻法的變化都是對上一部婚姻法立法價值取向的繼承和發(fā)展,都以婚姻家庭的和諧、穩(wěn)定、幸福作為最終的價值目標。結(jié)合與親屬法立法價值取向應然狀態(tài)的對比,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)隨著我國市場經(jīng)濟的深入發(fā)展及社會的快速轉(zhuǎn)型,親屬法的立法價值取向隨著三部司法解釋的頒布而逐漸發(fā)生了一定的偏離和異化,為了達到矯正的目的,不僅要兼顧個體利益與團體利益,而且要恢復對婚姻家庭本質(zhì)的重視,摒棄規(guī)則的物本化和立法的司法化,建立司法解釋的審查機制,同時強化親屬法的社會功能,尊重親屬法在民法典中的相對獨立性,以此使親屬法的立法價值取向回歸到應然的狀態(tài),使親屬法發(fā)揮應有的作用。
[Abstract]:The law of kinship is the sum of the legal norms that stipulate the occurrence, alteration and elimination of the status of relatives, as well as the relationship, rights and obligations between husband and wife, parents and children and other relatives to a certain extent. The object of the regulation of kinship law includes personal relation and property relationship. In addition to regulating the social relations among the relatives mentioned above, the state conveys to society the principles and pursuit of values that can be widely recognized and accepted. The choice of the legislative value orientation of the relative law plays an important role in judging whether a law is a good law, whether it can promote the harmony and stability of the family and society. In this sense, the topic of this paper is rich in theoretical value and practical significance. As far as the theoretical value is concerned, the research on the legislative value orientation of the relative law can to a certain extent make up for the lack of attention to the basic theory of the relative law and the lack of research. From the aspect of practical value, it is well known that the choice of legislative value orientation is the first step in making a law, and the correct legislative value orientation is not only related to the adjustment of society and the norm of people's behavior by a law. It also plays an important role in accelerating the construction of rule of law and social harmony and stability. Therefore, for the deviation of the legislative value orientation of the relative law, the current situation of alienation should be paid enough attention to, to contain the development and spread of this phenomenon, and to better coordinate the relationship between individual interests and the overall interests of the family. Ensure the realization of family functions, maintain family harmony, stability, happiness, promote social harmony and stability, prosperity and development. Therefore, it is necessary to correct the deviation and alienation of the current legislation value orientation of the relative law. Based on the analysis of the actual status of the legislative value orientation of the marriage law in 1950 and 1980, we can see that with the continuous progress of our society, the reform and development of the continuous deepening, The change of each marriage law is the inheritance and development of the value orientation of the last marriage law legislation, and the ultimate value goal is the harmony, stability and happiness of marriage and family. In combination with the comparison of the legal value orientation of the family law, we can find that with the further development of the market economy and the rapid transformation of the society in our country, With the promulgation of the three judicial interpretations, the legislative value orientation of the law of relatives has gradually deviated and alienated. In order to achieve the purpose of correction, it is necessary not only to give consideration to the interests of individuals and groups, but also to restore the importance of the essence of marriage and family. We should abandon the materialization of rules and legislation, establish a review mechanism of judicial interpretation, strengthen the social function of the law of relatives, and respect the relative independence of the law of relatives in the civil code. In this way, the legislative value orientation of kinship law is returned to its proper state, and the kinship law plays its due role.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D923.9

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 余能斌;夏利芬;;試論親屬法的基本屬性——兼談親屬法應否從民法典中獨立[J];湖北社會科學;2007年09期

2 周導杰;;對重建親屬法倫理的幾點認識[J];四川教育學院學報;2009年05期

3 李洪祥;;我國親屬法應當回歸未來民法典[J];吉林大學社會科學學報;2011年02期

4 李洪祥;;論我國民法典立法之親屬法體系構(gòu)建的價值取向[J];社會科學戰(zhàn)線;2012年12期

5 范治斌;;論中國親屬法的傳統(tǒng)精神特點[J];南昌教育學院學報;2013年08期

6 陳小君;于寧杰;;臺灣親屬法評介[J];中南政法學院學報;1990年04期

7 夏錦文;中西親屬法文化的沖突及其對近現(xiàn)代中國的影響[J];南京社會科學;1993年06期

8 曹伊清;;臺灣親屬法中妻子法律地位研究[J];南京大學法律評論;1996年01期

9 曹詩權(quán);中國親屬法的法文化源流和形式特點[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);1997年03期

10 周子良,李鋒;中國近現(xiàn)代親屬法的歷史考察及其當代啟示[J];山西大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2005年06期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 中國人民大學教授楊立新教授;簡單與復雜[N];檢察日報;2002年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前9條

1 李冰;偏離、異化、矯正：親屬法立法價值取向研究[D];遼寧師范大學;2016年

2 顧微微;民國親屬法淺探[D];華東政法學院;2005年

3 栗明輝;中國近代親屬法、繼承法制定和發(fā)展初探[D];中國政法大學;2002年

4 張銀麗;《大清民律草案》之親屬法研究[D];鄭州大學;2012年

5 朱麗;論我國親屬制度的構(gòu)建[D];黑龍江大學;2009年

6 范冬梅;我國臺灣地區(qū)民法親屬編修法述評[D];山東大學;2010年

7 王維佳;我國臺灣地區(qū)《民法·親屬》的發(fā)展及其啟示[D];長春工業(yè)大學;2013年

8 李剛;南京國民政府《民法·親屬編》研究[D];河南大學;2005年

9 李蓓;完善我國《婚姻法》中親屬制度的立法研究[D];湖南師范大學;2002年

，

本文編號：1875817