本文選題：別居 + 夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系��； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文

【摘要】： 別居制度源于古羅馬時(shí)期《十二銅表法》的規(guī)定,到了中世紀(jì)的歐洲,寺院法盛行一時(shí),它對(duì)世俗事務(wù)特別是婚姻家庭生活的干預(yù),使得寺院法所采取的禁止離婚的救濟(jì)措施——?jiǎng)e居也隨之確立并被廣泛適用。隨著宗教改革中婚姻還俗運(yùn)動(dòng)的發(fā)展、羅馬法的復(fù)興以及羅馬法中婚姻家庭立法原則、規(guī)則及立法技術(shù)的日趨縝密,資本主義的婚姻家庭立法有了現(xiàn)實(shí)和法律借鑒,也使得資產(chǎn)階級(jí)的法學(xué)家們賦予了別居制度以新的法律涵義。我國(guó)從古到今奉行許可離婚主義,在封建時(shí)代實(shí)行的是離婚過(guò)錯(cuò)原則,即“七出”、“三不去”。建國(guó)后在離婚制度中適用無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)原則,即以夫妻感情確已破裂為準(zhǔn)予離婚的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),而關(guān)于別居的規(guī)定則只在1989年最高人民法院《關(guān)于人民法院審理離婚案件如何認(rèn)定夫妻感情確已破裂的若干具體意見(jiàn)》第7條和婚姻法修正案第三十二條第三款第四項(xiàng)中有所涉及,但是對(duì)于別居的事實(shí)認(rèn)定、別居期間配偶權(quán)的行使、子女撫養(yǎng)及夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)等問(wèn)題的相關(guān)規(guī)定還未相應(yīng)地制定和完善。尤其是別居制度中夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系的確立,它涉及到別居期間子女的撫養(yǎng)問(wèn)題、親權(quán)的認(rèn)定問(wèn)題、監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)問(wèn)題、收養(yǎng)及人工生殖子女問(wèn)題,雙方父母的贍養(yǎng)問(wèn)題,夫妻雙方的扶養(yǎng)權(quán)和繼承權(quán)等問(wèn)題。本文即對(duì)別居期間的夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系問(wèn)題做了系統(tǒng)的研究。 文章分為緒言和三個(gè)部分,緒言提出了對(duì)我國(guó)別居期間夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系問(wèn)題進(jìn)行研究的重要性。第一部分是對(duì)研究別居期間夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系的必要性和現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行闡述。該部分首先分析了別居制度的源起和發(fā)展,在此基礎(chǔ)上,探討了我國(guó)研究別居期間夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系的必要性,并從我國(guó)研究別居期間夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系的現(xiàn)實(shí)條件和這一階段的夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系的獨(dú)特地位出發(fā),對(duì)我國(guó)目前對(duì)于該問(wèn)題的處理方式進(jìn)行分析,認(rèn)為我國(guó)目前的做法不利于實(shí)現(xiàn)男女平等,也不利于當(dāng)事人利益的保護(hù)。 第二部分是對(duì)一些國(guó)家關(guān)于別居期間夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系法律的典型規(guī)定和典型做法進(jìn)行比較分析。通過(guò)分析各國(guó)的相關(guān)規(guī)定,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)各國(guó)在自身國(guó)情的基礎(chǔ)上,做出了各有特色的規(guī)定,這也與各國(guó)法律中別居與離婚的關(guān)系有關(guān),但是,在各有特色的別居期間夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系問(wèn)題的規(guī)定中,又可以發(fā)現(xiàn)一些相通的地方,即涉及的問(wèn)題方面大同小異,基本涉及包括夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)制的變化、夫妻間的相互扶養(yǎng)關(guān)系、子女的撫養(yǎng)、別居期間夫妻債務(wù)的承擔(dān)等等。通過(guò)比較分析,筆者認(rèn)為,針對(duì)我國(guó)的立法來(lái)說(shuō),應(yīng)當(dāng)在借鑒各國(guó)先進(jìn)理論的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合我國(guó)的特點(diǎn),在處理別居期間的夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系問(wèn)題上,走一條自己的路。 第三部分則詳細(xì)探討了我國(guó)別居期間夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系的原則以及涉及完善的若干個(gè)問(wèn)題�！痘橐龇ā冯m然屬于民法范疇,可適用民法的一些基本原則,但由于婚姻家庭法具有一定的身份性,民法的有些原理并不適用,如等價(jià)有償原則,有些婚姻家庭中的財(cái)產(chǎn)問(wèn)題民法又無(wú)法涉及到,因此有必要對(duì)別居期間夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系做出一般性原則的分析。在分析了一般原則的基礎(chǔ)上,本文還對(duì)與之相關(guān)的若干具體財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)探討,以期能使我國(guó)在別居期間夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系問(wèn)題的處理上能更加合理有效,從而實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)當(dāng)事人利益的真正保護(hù)。 這些問(wèn)題處理的好,有利于推進(jìn)我國(guó)婚姻家庭制度的民主化、法治化進(jìn)程,有利于實(shí)現(xiàn)我國(guó)婚姻法規(guī)定的婚姻自由原則,有利于完善我國(guó)擬訂的民法典的框架,有利于將我國(guó)的婚姻家庭法與世界先進(jìn)的婚姻家庭法律制度并軌,解決國(guó)際私法中婚姻家庭規(guī)范的沖突,有利于解決港澳臺(tái)區(qū)際婚姻家庭立法與大陸婚姻家庭法的沖突,有利于和平解決離婚糾紛,有利于保護(hù)婚姻各方當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)益,有利于保護(hù)第三人的合法權(quán)益。別居制度中夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系問(wèn)題的確立,是我國(guó)婚姻家庭立法向世界先進(jìn)立法例邁進(jìn)的標(biāo)志,是我國(guó)離婚制度走向文明的標(biāo)志。
[Abstract]:Provisions of the separation system originated in ancient Rome period "Twelve Tables", in the Middle Ages in Europe, temple law prevailed, especially marriage and family life intervention on the worldly affairs, the temple law adopted the prohibition of divorce relief measures of separation be established and widely applicable. Along with the development of the marriage to religious reform movement in the revival of Rome law and Rome law of marriage and family legislation principles, rules and legislative technology increasingly careful, capitalism marriage and family legislation provides a practical and legal reference, making bourgeois jurists gives the separation system to the new legal meaning. China since ancient times pursue licensing divorce. In the implementation of the feudal era of divorce is the fault principle, namely "7", "three no". After the founding of the principle of no fault liability in divorce system, which couples that have been broken To grant divorce standards and regulations about the separation is only in 1989 the Supreme People's Court of the people's court divorce cases how to identify the relationship has been broken up a number of specific views > seventh and the amendment of marriage law thirty-second paragraph third of fourth has been involved, but for the separation of the facts, the exercise of spouse right during separation, the relevant provisions of child custody and property issues are not a corresponding development and improvement. Especially the establishment of marital property relations in the separation system, it relates to the separation of children during the custody problem, cognizance of parental power, custody, adoption and artificial reproductive problems, maintenance problems on both sides the parents of the couple's problems or rights and inheritance rights. This paper makes a systematic study on the problem of property between husband and wife during separation.
The article is divided into introduction and three parts. The introduction presents the importance to study in China during the period of separation of marital property relationship. The first part is about the necessity of the marital property relationship and realistic basis of the study in this paper. The separation during the first part of the origin and development of the separation system, on this basis, discussed the necessity in our research the separation of property between husband and wife during, and starting from the unique status of marital property relations in China during the period of separation conditions of marital property relationship and this stage, at present to our country for the treatment of the problem analysis, believes that China's current practice is not conducive to achieving gender equality, protection is not conducive to the interests of the parties.
The second part is about some countries about the typical legal provisions of marital property relationship during separation and typical practices were compared and analyzed. Through the analysis of the relevant provisions, can be found in countries based on their own national conditions, make the provisions of the characteristics of each, this is also relevant, and the relationship between separation and divorce laws of many countries but in the regulations the separation of property between husband and wife during their problems in and we can find some similarities, namely the problems involved are similar, including the basic change of marital property system, the mutual dependency between husband and wife, child support, separation during the couple's debts and so on. Through comparative analysis, the author believes that for me in the legislation, should be based on the advanced theory, combining the characteristics of our country, the marital property relations in dealing with the problems during separation on the go A path for myself.
The third part discusses the separation of property between husband and wife during the principle as well as to some problems in the marriage law. < > perfect although belonging to the category of civil law, applicable to some of the basic principles of civil law, but the law of marriage and family has a certain status, some principle of civil law does not apply, such as the principle of equal value, civil law property some problems in the marriage and family can not be involved, so it is necessary to make a general analysis of the principle of separation during the marital property relationship. Based on the analysis of the general principles, this paper also discusses on some specific property related issues, in order to make the treatment of property between husband and wife in China in the separation period can be more reasonable and effective, so as to realize the protection of the interests of the parties.
These problems a good deal, is conducive to promoting the marriage and family system in China's democratization, legalization process, is conducive to the realization of the principle of freedom of marriage in China's marriage law, is conducive to improving the framework of China's civil code draft, is conducive to China's marriage and family law with the advanced legal system of marriage and family the merger, to resolve the conflict of marriage and family norms in international law, is conducive to resolving conflicts in Hong Kong and Taiwan regions, marriage and family law and the law of marriage and family, is conducive to the peaceful settlement of the divorce disputes, to protect the lawful rights of the parties to the marriage, is conducive to the protection of the legitimate rights of the third person. The establishment of the separation system of marital property relations the problem is, our marriage and family legislation to mark world advanced legislation forward, is a sign of China's divorce system to civilization.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.9

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 楊玲;我國(guó)設(shè)立別居制度的立法構(gòu)想[D];延邊大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1749688