本文選題：身份占有　切入點(diǎn)：配偶身份占有　出處：《寧波大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在現(xiàn)代社會(huì)，自然人在事實(shí)上享有的作為配偶、父母、子女、學(xué)生和城市人等身份時(shí)在法律上不被承認(rèn)與保護(hù)是常見的現(xiàn)象，享有特定身份關(guān)系是某些財(cái)產(chǎn)利益實(shí)現(xiàn)的基礎(chǔ)。這就要求人們認(rèn)識(shí)到事實(shí)身份關(guān)系存在的事實(shí)，而事實(shí)身份卻在我國(guó)法律上得不到應(yīng)有的保護(hù)。因而就會(huì)引發(fā)筆者的思考，要求必須有形式要件的婚姻法是否能夠包含所有的現(xiàn)象？如果不能解決，那是否可以借鑒域外法上的制度來調(diào)整規(guī)范漏洞？本文寫作的主旨是在用更加簡(jiǎn)單、完善的制度法規(guī)來解決上述的問題。 本文從四大部分來展開，采用的是總分式的結(jié)構(gòu)，本文主要借鑒身份占有制度，從羅馬取得時(shí)效制度的法律研究適用于人身法入手，擴(kuò)展研究了近現(xiàn)代歐美民法人身法的身份占有制度，得出了取得時(shí)效制度在人身法上具有可行性的結(jié)論，在域外法的基礎(chǔ)上研究了身份占有制度在我國(guó)可能適用的情形。 第一部分從總體上主要介紹了身份占有制度的基本理論。概括提煉了身份占有的內(nèi)涵，分析認(rèn)證了身份占有的事實(shí)性質(zhì)，深層挖掘了身份占有的起源，闡述探究了身份占有的功能。 第二部分詳細(xì)介紹了夫妻關(guān)系身份占有。從意大利民法典、埃塞俄比亞民法典的身份占有為主線。結(jié)合法條來說明身份占有的證明要素有哪些。在此基礎(chǔ)上，用刑法與婚姻法關(guān)于事實(shí)婚的不同態(tài)度，婚姻法對(duì)于事實(shí)婚的否認(rèn)態(tài)度，而刑法上重婚罪中事實(shí)婚構(gòu)成犯罪，兩種截然不同的態(tài)度引出問題所在。并結(jié)合身份占有來解決幾種可以適用于夫妻關(guān)系的情形。 第三部分主要介紹了親子關(guān)系身份占有。分別從魁北克民法典、意大利民法典來介紹。結(jié)合法條來闡明親子關(guān)系的身份占有，具體探究事實(shí)收養(yǎng)關(guān)系，錯(cuò)養(yǎng)等情形，，分析用收養(yǎng)法、繼承法等無法解決的情形下，筆者建議適用身份占有來維護(hù)已經(jīng)形成的社會(huì)秩序。 第四部分從介紹法國(guó)民法典的國(guó)民身份占有為開始，從另一個(gè)視角來看村民身份資格的取得，延伸事實(shí)身份占有適用的可能。作為移民城市的農(nóng)民，作為旁聽生分別取得相應(yīng)的資格適用的情形。盡管這樣可能存在不足，但本文為那些深陷混亂現(xiàn)象無法解決的公民提出解決意見。
[Abstract]:In modern society, it is common for natural persons to have de facto status as spouses, parents, children, students and urban people, which are not legally recognized and protected. It requires people to realize the fact that the fact identity relation exists, but the fact identity can not be protected in our country law. Therefore, the author will think about it. Can a marriage law that requires formal elements include all phenomena? If not, can we learn from the system of extraterritorial law to adjust the loopholes? The purpose of this paper is to solve the above problems with more simple and perfect regulations. This paper starts from four parts and adopts the structure of total division. This paper mainly draws lessons from the system of identity possession, and starts with the legal study of the prescription system in Rome, which is applicable to the personal body law. This paper extends the study of the status possession system of the personal status law in modern European and American civil law, and draws the conclusion that the acquisitive prescription system is feasible in the personal status law, and studies the possible application of the status possession system in our country on the basis of the extraterritorial law. The first part mainly introduces the basic theory of identity possession system, summarizes the connotation of identity possession, analyzes the factual nature of identity possession, and excavates the origin of identity possession deeply. This paper expounds the function of identity possession. The second part introduces the marital relationship identity possession in detail. From the Italian Civil Code, Ethiopia Civil Code identity possession as the main line. Combined with the law to explain what the elements of proof of identity possession. On this basis, Using the different attitudes of criminal law and marriage law about de facto marriage, the marriage law denies the de facto marriage, while in the criminal law, the crime of bigamy constitutes a crime. Two very different attitudes raise the problem and combine identity possession to solve several situations that can be applied to a couple. The third part mainly introduces the status possession of parent-child relationship. It is introduced from Quebec Civil Code and Italian Civil Code respectively. In combination with the articles of law, it clarifies the status possession of parent-child relationship, probes into the actual adoptive relationship, misraise and so on. Under the situation that the adoption law and inheritance law can not be solved, the author suggests that identity possession should be applied to maintain the social order that has been formed. The 4th part begins with the introduction of the French Civil Code on the possession of national identity, from another angle of view to see the acquisition of villagers' identity qualifications, and extends the possibility of the application of factual identity possession. Although this may not be sufficient, this paper proposes solutions for those citizens who are mired in chaos.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D913

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 尹春海;;重婚法律制度[J];重慶工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年08期

2 車忠海;;身份關(guān)系的法律研究——以民法中的身份關(guān)系與親屬法中的身份關(guān)系、身份權(quán)比較為視角[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年19期

3 馬婧怡;;羅馬法取得時(shí)效制度研究及當(dāng)今立法展望[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年08期

4 羅璨;;淺析取得時(shí)效在我國(guó)的實(shí)現(xiàn)[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年02期

5 陳南君;;反思我國(guó)事實(shí)婚重疊的處理方法及相應(yīng)對(duì)策[J];黑龍江史志;2008年22期

6 徐國(guó)棟;;論取得時(shí)效制度在人身關(guān)系法和公法上的適用[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2005年04期

本文編號(hào)：1597962