本文選題：扶養(yǎng)　切入點(diǎn)：扶養(yǎng)費(fèi)請(qǐng)求權(quán)　出處：《浙江大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文以生活需要為視角,探討了扶養(yǎng)費(fèi)請(qǐng)求權(quán)的產(chǎn)生、行使與消滅的問(wèn)題。全文共分為六個(gè)部分,概要如下:第一部分是引言,闡述本文的研究?jī)r(jià)值并點(diǎn)題。第二部分闡述了扶養(yǎng)費(fèi)請(qǐng)求權(quán)糾紛的司法立場(chǎng)。分別從扶養(yǎng)費(fèi)請(qǐng)求權(quán)的產(chǎn)生、扶養(yǎng)費(fèi)請(qǐng)求權(quán)之訴的權(quán)利主體以及扶養(yǎng)費(fèi)請(qǐng)求權(quán)是否適用訴訟時(shí)效這三個(gè)焦點(diǎn)出發(fā),將司法實(shí)踐中的扶養(yǎng)費(fèi)糾紛作了歸納總結(jié)。第三部分是針對(duì)第二部分判例的反思,拋出生活需要才是扶養(yǎng)費(fèi)請(qǐng)求權(quán)產(chǎn)生的前提這一觀點(diǎn),為下文的論證作鋪墊。第四部分是全文的核心。下分三個(gè)小點(diǎn),第一小點(diǎn)論證了生活需要是整個(gè)扶養(yǎng)制度建立的起因,并詳細(xì)闡述了對(duì)"生活需要"這一概念的理解;第二小點(diǎn)是結(jié)合全文第二部分的判例,從生活需要的視角來(lái)解釋扶養(yǎng)費(fèi)請(qǐng)求權(quán)行使過(guò)程中可能出現(xiàn)的各種法律問(wèn)題,主要包括扶養(yǎng)費(fèi)請(qǐng)求權(quán)的主體問(wèn)題、客體問(wèn)題以及適用訴訟時(shí)效與否的問(wèn)題;第三小點(diǎn)探討了扶養(yǎng)費(fèi)請(qǐng)求權(quán)消滅的原因,包括當(dāng)事人死亡、扶養(yǎng)要件消失、身份關(guān)系消滅等,以及該等原因背后尚存爭(zhēng)議的關(guān)于扶養(yǎng)費(fèi)請(qǐng)求權(quán)的法律問(wèn)題,以保證全文問(wèn)題探討邏輯的完整性。第五部分為扶養(yǎng)糾紛的解決提供了相關(guān)建議。主要從把握扶養(yǎng)制度與親屬法之間的關(guān)系進(jìn)行了闡述,并針對(duì)扶養(yǎng)費(fèi)糾紛提出了些許裁判對(duì)策,同時(shí)呼吁我國(guó)加緊完善對(duì)扶養(yǎng)制度的相關(guān)立法,以統(tǒng)一裁判標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。第六部分即結(jié)語(yǔ),顧名思義,為對(duì)全文的簡(jiǎn)要總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of life needs, this paper discusses the emergence, exercise and elimination of the right to claim for maintenance. The full text is divided into six parts: the first part is the introduction. The second part expounds the judicial stand of the dispute over the right of claim for maintenance, respectively from the origin of the right of claim for maintenance. Starting from the three focal points of the subject of the right to claim for maintenance and whether the right to claim for maintenance is applicable to the limitation of action, the author summarizes the disputes over maintenance in judicial practice. The third part is the reflection of the second part of the case law. The view that living needs are the premise of the right to claim for maintenance is the foundation for the following argument. Part 4th is the core of the full text. The first point demonstrates that the need for life is the cause of the establishment of the entire maintenance system. And elaborated the understanding of the concept of "living need" in detail. The second little point is to explain various legal problems that may appear in the process of exercising the right of claim for maintenance expenses from the perspective of life needs in the light of the case law in the second part of the paper. It mainly includes the subject, object and the limitation of action. The third point discusses the reasons of the extinguishment of the claim, including the death of the parties, the disappearance of the supporting elements, the elimination of the identity relationship, etc. And the legal issues relating to the right to claim for maintenance that remain in dispute behind those reasons, In order to ensure the integrity of the logic of the full text, part 5th provides relevant suggestions for the settlement of maintenance disputes. It mainly expounds the relationship between the maintenance system and the law of relatives. The author also puts forward some judgment countermeasures against the dispute of maintenance expenses, and appeals to our country to improve the relevant legislation on the maintenance system to unify the judgment standard. 6th is the conclusion, as the name implies, for the brief summary of the full text.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 楊巍;;訴訟時(shí)效適用對(duì)象之體系化解讀及立法完善——評(píng)“民法典·民法總則專家建議稿”第180、181條[J];東方法學(xué);2015年06期

2 尹田;;論訴訟時(shí)效的適用范圍[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年03期

3 鞠琳;胡浩亮;陸劍萍;;未成年非婚生子女追索撫養(yǎng)費(fèi)的訴訟時(shí)效[J];人民司法;2009年24期

4 張馳;論訴訟時(shí)效客體[J];法學(xué);2001年03期

5 程嘯,陳林;論訴訟時(shí)效客體[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1597271