歧義在語言交流過程中隨處可見,古今中外各個(gè)語言學(xué)家都對這一現(xiàn)象提出了各自的獨(dú)到的見解。特別是在古希臘,語言學(xué)研究比較發(fā)達(dá)的階段,無論是哲學(xué)家還是語言學(xué)家都提出了相應(yīng)的歧義理論。直到當(dāng)代,尤其被譽(yù)為句法理論奠基人的美國語言學(xué)家Chomsky更把歧義的分析與研究應(yīng)用在實(shí)際的句法構(gòu)成當(dāng)中,使分散的歧義理論更加的系統(tǒng)化。除此之外,在中國誕生出諸如趙元任、邱述德、朱德熙等研究這一理論的許多語言學(xué)家,在他們的努力下,歧義理論走出了英語這一單一語言范疇,進(jìn)入了漢語語言結(jié)構(gòu)的分析,無疑是一個(gè)偉大的創(chuàng)舉。特別是近年來,歧義研究理論的興起與應(yīng)用正以新的視角如火如荼的展開,涉及的領(lǐng)域已經(jīng)走出了純語言的環(huán)境。文化、經(jīng)濟(jì),以及科技等諸多方面都有歧義的應(yīng)用實(shí)例。本文以語用學(xué)中各個(gè)語言學(xué)家提出的不同的歧義理論來分析研究商務(wù)合同寫作過程中產(chǎn)生的歧義現(xiàn)象,旨在通過若干實(shí)例的定性分析,來揭示歧義這一語言現(xiàn)象,同時(shí),就這一語言現(xiàn)象提出若干的消除方法。因此,立足于這一理論,本文首先從語言學(xué)的角度剖析產(chǎn)生歧義的背景和原因；其次,分析合同這一特殊的契約工具的文體特點(diǎn)及歷史作用；以上述兩大理論依據(jù),研究合同撰寫過程中會(huì)出現(xiàn)哪些歧義... 

【文章來源】：沈陽師范大學(xué)遼寧省

【文章頁數(shù)】：81 頁

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 General Description of the Study
    1.2 Significance of the Study
    1.3 Purpose of the Study
    1.4 Overall Structure of the Thesis
Chapter 2 Literature Review
    2.1 Definition and Explanation of Ambiguity
        2.1.1 A Historical Perspective of Ambiguity
        2.1.2 Definitions of Ambiguity
        2.1.3 Features of Ambiguity
        2.1.4 Ambiguity at Various Levels
            2.1.4.1 Phonetic or PhonologicaI Ambiguity
            2.1.4.2 Lexical Ambiguity
            2.1.4.3 Syntactic Ambiguity
            2.1.4.4 Pragmatic Ambiguity
    2.2 Overview of Business Contract
        2.2.1 Definition of Business Contract
        2.2.2 Classification of Business Contract
        2.2.3 Provisions and Legal Elements of Business Contract
        2.2.4 Structural Characteristics of Business Contract
        2.2.5 Language Features of Business Contract
            2.2.5.1 Wording and Expression
            2.2.5.2 Sentence Structure
            2.2.5.3 Tense
Chapter 3 Methodology of the Study
    3.1 Design of the Study
    3.2 Research Question
    3.3 Source of Data
    3.4 The Tool for the Analysis of Data
    3.5 Results of Data Analysis
    3.6 Summary
Chapter 4 Ambiguity in Business Contraet and Disambiguation Strategies
    4.1 Ambiguity in Business Contract
        4.1.1 Ambiguity of Phrasal Adjective
        4.1.2 Ambiguity of Finite and Infinite Subordinate Clauses
        4.1.3 Ambiguity of the Negative Sentence with the Causative Clause
        4.1.4 Ambiguity of Reference
            4.1.4.1 Selective Ambiguity of Reference
            4.1.4.2 Multiple Ambiguity of Reference
        4.1.5 Ambiguity of Post-modifiers
            4.1.5.1 Single Selective Modifiers
            4.1.5.2 Multiple Selective Modifiers
        4.1.6 Ambiguity of Adverbs and Adverbial Phrases
            4.1.6.1 Squinting Modifiers and Adverbial Phrases
            4.1.6.2 Dangling Adverbs and Adverbial Phrases
            4.1.6.3 Ambiguity of the Adverb"Only"
        4.1.7 Ambiguity of Prepositions
        4.1.8 Ambiguity of Pre-modifiers
            4.1.8.1 Single Selective Pre-modifiers
            4.1.8.2 Multiple Selective Pre-modifiers
    4.2 Rules of Drafting Business Contracts
    4.3 Strategies of Disambiguation Based on the Rules
        4.3.1 Phrasal Adjective
        4.3.2 Definite and Indefinite Subordinate Clause
        4.3.3 Causative Clause behind A Negation Sentence
        4.3.4 Post-modifiers
            4.3.4.1 Modification of All Antecedents
            4.3.4.2 Modification of the Last Antecedent
        4.3.5 Adverb and Adverbial Phrase
        4.3.6 Pre-modifiers
    4.4 Summary
Chapter 5 Conclusion
    5.1 Major Findings
    5.2 Limitations of the Study
    5.3 Suggestions for Further Researches
References
Appendix



本文編號(hào)：3408996