【摘要】：作為違約損害賠償中完全賠償原則的例外,可預(yù)見性原則自其確立之日起,就逐漸被英美法系和大陸法系中大多數(shù)國家所接受。我國《合同法》第113條規(guī)定的是可預(yù)見性規(guī)則,其確立有利于保障交易的安全,但由于對可預(yù)見性規(guī)則的規(guī)定過于概括,又缺乏系統(tǒng)的研究,使得可預(yù)見性規(guī)則在我國的司法實踐中適用不多。本文通過回顧分析可預(yù)見性規(guī)則的起源與發(fā)展,深入研究不同時間段內(nèi)規(guī)則適用的具體情況,簡述可預(yù)見性規(guī)則的基本內(nèi)容,分析其理論基礎(chǔ),進(jìn)而從立法現(xiàn)狀和司法實踐兩個方面入手研究可預(yù)見性規(guī)則在我國的適用情況,以期提出有效措施來促進(jìn)可預(yù)見性原則的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:As an exception to the principle of full compensation for damages for breach of contract, the principle of predictability has been accepted by most countries in Anglo-American law system and civil law system since its establishment. Article 113 of contract Law of our country stipulates the rule of predictability, its establishment is helpful to guarantee the security of transaction, but because the rule of predictability is too general, it lacks systematic research. The rule of predictability is seldom applied in judicial practice in our country. By reviewing and analyzing the origin and development of predictability rules, this paper makes a thorough study of the application of the rules in different periods of time, briefly describes the basic contents of the rules, and analyzes the theoretical basis of the rules. Then the author studies the application of predictability rules in our country from two aspects of legislation and judicial practice in order to put forward effective measures to promote the development of the principle of predictability.
【作者單位】： 北京交通大學(xué);
【分類號】：D923.6
，

本文編號：2410646