締約過程中的信息披露義務(wù)
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-22 15:48
【摘要】：在締約過程中，一方當(dāng)事人經(jīng)常出于對自身利益的考量而隱匿訂立合同相關(guān)信息,這種隱匿信息的行為不利于提高合同交易的經(jīng)濟(jì)效率，不利于增加社會福利,同時也會給合同相對方帶來極大的締約風(fēng)險。針對此種情形，近現(xiàn)代英美合同法學(xué)者主張締約階段合同當(dāng)事人負(fù)有一定的信息披露義務(wù)，但對于何種信息應(yīng)該披露，披露信息的邊界和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)如何確定，，學(xué)界存在“合理第三人標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”、“經(jīng)濟(jì)分析標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”、“合理期待標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”等諸多學(xué)說。筆者認(rèn)為基于目前我國法治環(huán)境，“合理期待標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”更為契合締約過程中的信息披露義務(wù)，也就更具有參考價值。另外，信息披露義務(wù)的履行必須嚴(yán)格遵守其標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和范圍；不履行信息披露義務(wù)的一方可能會給相對人造成損失，此種損失應(yīng)由信息隱匿方承擔(dān)相應(yīng)的締約過失責(zé)任。 在導(dǎo)論中，通過案例分析，文章指明締約信息披露義務(wù)的重要性及披露義務(wù)邊界與范圍界定之必要性。文章正文的第一部分主要簡述信息披露義務(wù)的來源。第二部分則著力探討締約過程中信息披露義務(wù)的履行，主要內(nèi)容涉及對何種信息應(yīng)予以披露，披露義務(wù)的履行之標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、履行的條件以及履行的時間。文章第三部分主要探討違反信息披露義務(wù)的影響及其責(zé)任承擔(dān)。 結(jié)語總結(jié)并厘清前述主要內(nèi)容，最后點明目前在我國，“合理期待”比較契合當(dāng)前法治環(huán)境下的信息披露義務(wù)。
[Abstract]:In the process of contracting, a party often conceals the relevant information of contract conclusion out of consideration of his own interests, which is not conducive to improving the economic efficiency of the contract transaction and increasing social welfare. At the same time, it will bring great contracting risk to the relative party of the contract. In view of this situation, the modern Anglo-American contract law scholars advocate that the contracting parties should have a certain obligation to disclose information, but for what kind of information should be disclosed, how to determine the boundary and standard of disclosure information. There are many theories in academic circles, such as reasonable third party standard, economic analysis standard, reasonable expectation standard and so on. The author thinks that based on the current legal environment of our country, "reasonable expectation standard" is more in line with the obligation of information disclosure in the process of contracting, and it has more reference value. In addition, the performance of the obligation of information disclosure must strictly abide by its standard and scope; the party who fails to perform the obligation of information disclosure may cause losses to the relative party, and such loss should be borne by the party that conceals the information. In the introduction, through case analysis, this paper points out the importance of the obligation of disclosure of information in contracting and the necessity of defining the boundary and scope of the obligation of disclosure. The first part of the text describes the source of information disclosure obligations. The second part focuses on the implementation of information disclosure obligations in the process of contracting. The main content involves what kind of information should be disclosed, the standard of disclosure obligations, the conditions of performance and the time of performance. The third part mainly discusses the influence of violating the obligation of information disclosure and its responsibility. The conclusion summarizes and clarifies the above main contents, and finally points out that at present in our country, "reasonable expectation" accords with the obligation of information disclosure under the current environment of rule of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.6
本文編號：2287594
[Abstract]:In the process of contracting, a party often conceals the relevant information of contract conclusion out of consideration of his own interests, which is not conducive to improving the economic efficiency of the contract transaction and increasing social welfare. At the same time, it will bring great contracting risk to the relative party of the contract. In view of this situation, the modern Anglo-American contract law scholars advocate that the contracting parties should have a certain obligation to disclose information, but for what kind of information should be disclosed, how to determine the boundary and standard of disclosure information. There are many theories in academic circles, such as reasonable third party standard, economic analysis standard, reasonable expectation standard and so on. The author thinks that based on the current legal environment of our country, "reasonable expectation standard" is more in line with the obligation of information disclosure in the process of contracting, and it has more reference value. In addition, the performance of the obligation of information disclosure must strictly abide by its standard and scope; the party who fails to perform the obligation of information disclosure may cause losses to the relative party, and such loss should be borne by the party that conceals the information. In the introduction, through case analysis, this paper points out the importance of the obligation of disclosure of information in contracting and the necessity of defining the boundary and scope of the obligation of disclosure. The first part of the text describes the source of information disclosure obligations. The second part focuses on the implementation of information disclosure obligations in the process of contracting. The main content involves what kind of information should be disclosed, the standard of disclosure obligations, the conditions of performance and the time of performance. The third part mainly discusses the influence of violating the obligation of information disclosure and its responsibility. The conclusion summarizes and clarifies the above main contents, and finally points out that at present in our country, "reasonable expectation" accords with the obligation of information disclosure under the current environment of rule of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.6
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 姜淑明;先合同義務(wù)及違反先合同義務(wù)之責(zé)任形態(tài)研究[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);2000年02期
2 焦富民;論我國締約過失責(zé)任制度的發(fā)展與完善[J];法學(xué)論壇;2002年06期
本文編號：2287594
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2287594.html
