【摘要】：善意取得合同效力的認定是解決善意取得在適用《物權(quán)法》第106條與《合同法》第51條時所面臨各種可能沖突與相應(yīng)理論困惑的邏輯前提。論文通過證成無權(quán)處分行為不影響合同效力得出善意取得合同為有效,并通過設(shè)定善意取得亦應(yīng)遵循《物權(quán)法》中的一般物權(quán)變動模式(債權(quán)形式主義)而得出其所依據(jù)的合同也應(yīng)為有效。論文還證成僅依善意取得合同的有效并不能保證善意第三人取得權(quán)利的絕對性,仍需要公示公信力實現(xiàn)善意取得物權(quán)的對世性,從而能夠?qū)乖瓩?quán)利人的原物返還請求權(quán)。善意取得應(yīng)遵守一般物權(quán)變動模式且善意取得合同有效的結(jié)論表明其性質(zhì)應(yīng)為繼受取得。善意取得合同有效認定的多種實踐優(yōu)勢表明,為了貫徹《物權(quán)法》與《合同法》在法律適用上的統(tǒng)一以及在未來立法中融入先進的法律理念,最好在《物權(quán)法》中把善意取得合同明確為有效并摒棄《合同法》中無權(quán)處分合同效力待定之規(guī)定。
[Abstract]:The determination of the validity of bona fide acquisition of contract is the logical premise to solve the various possible conflicts and theoretical puzzles faced by bona fide acquisition in the application of Article 106 of Real Law and Article 51 of contract Law. By proving that unauthorized disposition does not affect the validity of the contract, the paper concludes that the acquisition of the contract in good faith is effective. And by establishing that the acquisition in good faith should also follow the general mode of real right change (creditor's right formalism), the contract on which it is based should also be valid. The paper also proves that the validity of obtaining a contract only in good faith does not guarantee the absoluteness of the acquisition of rights by a bona fide third party, and it still needs public credibility to realize the universal nature of bona fide acquisition of real right, so as to be able to return the right of claim to the original object of the antigenic right holder. The conclusion that bona fide acquisition should abide by the general mode of real right change and that the bona fide acquisition contract is valid indicates that the nature of bona fide acquisition should be followed by acquisition. The multiple practical advantages of obtaining contracts in good faith show that in order to implement the unity of the application of the law between the Real right Law and the contract Law, and to incorporate advanced legal concepts into the future legislation, It is better to make the bona fide acquisition of contract valid in the Law of Real Rights and to abandon the provisions of the contract Law which have no right to dispose of the contract to be determined.
【作者單位】： 寧波大學(xué);吉林大學(xué)法學(xué)院;中國人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院博士后流動站;
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 彭誠信;我國物權(quán)變動理論的立法選擇(下)[J];法律科學(xué)-西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2000年02期

2 蔡立東;;轉(zhuǎn)讓合同效力與善意取得構(gòu)成的立法選擇——基于立法技術(shù)的考量[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2006年02期

3 吳國U，

本文編號：2229185