家作為民事主體的法律思考
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-31 14:28
【摘要】：本文研究論題為“家作為民事主體的法律思考”，即探討家的民事主體資格問題。文章采取縱向歷史考察與橫向域外法對比法，試圖把一個事實上自然存在，但卻被忽略的家的民事主體地位給梳理出來，實質(zhì)上就是證成家之民事主體的現(xiàn)實存在性，以求給家的法律地位“正身”。 文章分三部分： 第一部分，“家及其法律地位的歷史演變”。此部分主要探討兩個問題：其一，從家的本體論角度出發(fā)，給予家必要的解讀，作出本文關(guān)于家的界定：家是由具有一定血親、姻親或類似關(guān)系成員組成的，集身份性（生活）、經(jīng)濟性（生產(chǎn)）、社會性（社會）一體的，具有獨立法律地位的親屬團體、經(jīng)濟團體、社會團體。其二，從家的法律地位變遷的歷史維度，分別抽象出了家的三種法律地位：家在古代法上為民事主體，在近代法上為生活團體，在現(xiàn)代法上為經(jīng)濟團體。 第二部分，“家作為民事主體的法理思考”。即討論家作為民事主體判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)問題。民事主體的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)應(yīng)在考慮社會需求以及競爭規(guī)律的基礎(chǔ)之上，兼顧民事主體的開放式發(fā)展趨勢，應(yīng)將“民事主體功能論”、“民事主體利益論”、“法律確認(rèn)論”三者有機結(jié)合作為一般的民事主體判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。家同樣符合此標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，即家具有特定的功能，具有特殊的家之利益，也須法律的確認(rèn)。 第三部分，，“家作為民事主體的實定法考察”。這部分主要分別從國內(nèi)外物權(quán)法、合同法、侵權(quán)法角度入手，尋找家作為民事主體在物權(quán)法、合同法、侵權(quán)法上的“痕跡”。在物權(quán)法上，家產(chǎn)及其相關(guān)利益是家作為民事主體的核心；在合同法上，家的合同能力是家作為民事主體的支撐要素之一；在侵權(quán)法上，家的侵權(quán)責(zé)任同樣是家作為民事主體支撐要素之一。
[Abstract]:This paper discusses the subject of "the legal thinking of the family as a civil subject", that is, the qualification of the civil subject of the home. This paper attempts to carve out the civil subject status of a family which is in fact natural, but neglected, by means of longitudinal historical investigation and horizontal extraterritorial law. In essence, it is the reality existence of civil subject of testifying family. In order to give the legal status of the family "upright". The article is divided into three parts: the first part, the historical evolution of home and its legal status. This part mainly discusses two problems: first, from the point of view of the ontology of home, to give the necessary interpretation of home, to make the definition of home: home is made up of certain blood relatives, in-laws or members of similar relations. A group of relatives, economic groups, and social groups with independent legal status that integrate identity (life), economy (production), and society (society). Secondly, from the historical dimension of the change of the legal status of the family, it abstracts three kinds of legal status of the family: the family is a civil subject in ancient law, a living group in modern law, and an economic group in modern law. The second part, the legal thinking of home as a civil subject. That is to say, to discuss the judgment standard of the civil subject. The judgment standard of the civil subject should be based on the consideration of the social demand and the law of competition, the open development trend of the civil subject should be taken into account, and the theory of the function of the civil subject and the theory of the interests of the civil subject should be taken into account. The theory of legal confirmation is combined organically as the general judgment standard of civil subject. Home also meets this standard, namely furniture has specific function, has special home interest, also must the law confirmation. The third part, the investigation of the real law of home as a civil subject. This part mainly from the domestic and foreign property law, the contract law, the tort law angle, seeks the home as the civil subject in the real right law, the contract law, the tort law "trace". In the property law, the family property and its related interests are the core of the family as the civil subject; in the contract law, the ability of the family to contract is one of the supporting elements of the home as the civil subject; in the tort law, The tort liability of home is also one of the supporting elements of home as a civil subject.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D913
本文編號：2215269
[Abstract]:This paper discusses the subject of "the legal thinking of the family as a civil subject", that is, the qualification of the civil subject of the home. This paper attempts to carve out the civil subject status of a family which is in fact natural, but neglected, by means of longitudinal historical investigation and horizontal extraterritorial law. In essence, it is the reality existence of civil subject of testifying family. In order to give the legal status of the family "upright". The article is divided into three parts: the first part, the historical evolution of home and its legal status. This part mainly discusses two problems: first, from the point of view of the ontology of home, to give the necessary interpretation of home, to make the definition of home: home is made up of certain blood relatives, in-laws or members of similar relations. A group of relatives, economic groups, and social groups with independent legal status that integrate identity (life), economy (production), and society (society). Secondly, from the historical dimension of the change of the legal status of the family, it abstracts three kinds of legal status of the family: the family is a civil subject in ancient law, a living group in modern law, and an economic group in modern law. The second part, the legal thinking of home as a civil subject. That is to say, to discuss the judgment standard of the civil subject. The judgment standard of the civil subject should be based on the consideration of the social demand and the law of competition, the open development trend of the civil subject should be taken into account, and the theory of the function of the civil subject and the theory of the interests of the civil subject should be taken into account. The theory of legal confirmation is combined organically as the general judgment standard of civil subject. Home also meets this standard, namely furniture has specific function, has special home interest, also must the law confirmation. The third part, the investigation of the real law of home as a civil subject. This part mainly from the domestic and foreign property law, the contract law, the tort law angle, seeks the home as the civil subject in the real right law, the contract law, the tort law "trace". In the property law, the family property and its related interests are the core of the family as the civil subject; in the contract law, the ability of the family to contract is one of the supporting elements of the home as the civil subject; in the tort law, The tort liability of home is also one of the supporting elements of home as a civil subject.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D913
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 沈永敏;;關(guān)于我國民事主體結(jié)構(gòu)的反思與重構(gòu)[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年02期
2 陳華,劉勇;合伙可以成為獨立的民事主體和民事訴訟主體[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);1999年05期
3 曹新明,夏傳勝;抽象人格論與我國民事主體制度[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);2000年04期
4 馬俊駒;宋剛;;民事主體功能論——兼論國家作為民事主體[J];法學(xué)家;2003年06期
5 張善斌;;人格與人格權(quán)相關(guān)問題探討[J];法學(xué)評論;2011年06期
6 付翠英;;人格·權(quán)利能力·民事主體辨思——我國民法典的選擇[J];法學(xué);2006年08期
7 胡呂銀;;民事主體制度新論——兼論農(nóng)民集體的法律地位[J];河北法學(xué);2007年09期
8 肖立梅;;家庭的民事主體地位研究[J];河北法學(xué);2009年03期
9 張曉鷗,吳一鳴;論“其他組織”的法律地位:兼論民事主體標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];南通職業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(綜合版);2003年02期
10 賈云飛;;家庭的民事主體地位探究[J];前沿;2010年16期
本文編號：2215269
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2215269.html
