【摘要】：我國《合同法》第229條是關(guān)于“買賣不破租賃”規(guī)則的規(guī)定，但其只是對以往法律和司法解釋進(jìn)行了總結(jié)和沿襲，并沒有實(shí)質(zhì)性的突破和進(jìn)展。限于十幾年前理論研究水平有限，司法實(shí)踐中所暴露的問題不如當(dāng)今社會紛繁復(fù)雜，立法技術(shù)不甚先進(jìn)，使之規(guī)定過于簡單籠統(tǒng)。 在本文的論述中，筆者對買賣不破租賃規(guī)則進(jìn)行了分析，挖掘了該規(guī)則存在的意義與價(jià)值，參照國外立法，在合理借鑒其高超的立法技術(shù)和先進(jìn)理念的情況下，結(jié)合中國國情，對我國的買賣不破租賃規(guī)則提出了立法建議，以期使之更加完善。 文章主要分為以下三大部分： 第一章從一個案例入手，對比一審法院和二審法院的不同判決，引出三個主要的爭議問題，界定了文章的討論范圍。這三個爭議點(diǎn)貫穿全文，分別涉及買賣不破租賃的構(gòu)成要件和三方當(dāng)事人之間的法律關(guān)系問題，是實(shí)踐中最容易出問題的環(huán)節(jié)。 第二章是對買賣不破租賃規(guī)則的剖析，，其中包括對上述案例中的爭議點(diǎn)進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的分析和討論，其他有助于理解買賣不破租賃規(guī)則和解決案例爭議點(diǎn)的問題也在此展開，主要包括：簡單交代買賣不破租賃的概念，探討了租賃權(quán)的屬性，為下文具體分析爭議點(diǎn)奠定基礎(chǔ)，并以此來揭示買賣不破租賃規(guī)則的法律價(jià)值和存在意義。三個爭議點(diǎn)的具體解決部分是實(shí)踐中爭議最多，操作最難，也是和三方當(dāng)事人聯(lián)系最為密切的。而細(xì)化此規(guī)則的構(gòu)成要件及各方當(dāng)事人的權(quán)利義務(wù)關(guān)系，有助于在司法實(shí)踐中簡易此規(guī)則的操作性，使其發(fā)揮應(yīng)有的作用。 第三章主要對文中案例的處理意見進(jìn)行了簡述。因爭議點(diǎn)的存在是由于規(guī)則自身構(gòu)建不完善所造成的，上文分析了這些缺陷給司法實(shí)踐帶來的不確定性，筆者在此部分主要是解決問題，并有所對應(yīng)的提出具體的立法建議，以期完善我國的買賣不破租賃規(guī)則,達(dá)到減少訟源與安定秩序的目的。
[Abstract]:Article 229 of contract Law of our country is about the rule of "buying and selling without breaking lease", but it only summarizes and follows the legal and judicial interpretations of the past, and there is no substantial breakthrough and progress. Limited to the limited level of theoretical research more than ten years ago, the problems exposed in the judicial practice are not as complicated as the current society, and the legislative technology is not very advanced, which makes its provisions too simple and general. In this paper, the author analyzes the rule of unbreakable lease, excavates the significance and value of the rule, referring to the foreign legislation, under the circumstances of reasonable reference to its superb legislative technology and advanced ideas, combined with the national conditions of China. In order to make it more perfect, this paper puts forward some legislative suggestions on the rule of unbreakable lease in our country. The article is divided into the following three parts: chapter one begins with a case, compares the different judgments of the court of first instance and the court of second instance, leads to three main controversial issues, and defines the scope of discussion of the article. These three points of dispute run through the full text, which respectively involve the constitutive elements of buying and selling unbroken lease and the legal relationship between the three parties, which is the most easily problematic link in practice. The second chapter is the analysis of the rules of unbreakable lease, including the detailed analysis and discussion of the dispute points in the above cases, and the other problems which are helpful to understand the rules of unbreakable lease and to resolve the dispute points in the case. The main contents are as follows: a brief account of the concept of unbreakable lease, a discussion of the attributes of the lease right, to lay a foundation for the following specific analysis of disputes, and to reveal the legal value and significance of the rule of unbroken lease. The specific settlement of the three points of dispute is the most controversial in practice, the most difficult to operate, and the closest contact with the three parties. It is helpful to simplify the operation of the rule in judicial practice and to make it play its due role by refining the constitutive elements of the rule and the relationship between the rights and obligations of the parties. In the third chapter, the author gives a brief account of the cases in this paper. Because the existence of the dispute point is caused by the imperfect construction of the rules themselves, the author analyzes the uncertainty brought about by these defects to the judicial practice above. In this part, the author mainly solves the problem and puts forward some specific legislative suggestions. In order to perfect the rules of leasing, to reduce the source of litigation and stability.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱伯玉;“買賣不破租賃”的法理學(xué)分析[J];商業(yè)研究;2003年19期

2 柴振國,趙英;關(guān)于"讓與不破租賃"的幾個問題[J];法律適用;2005年02期

3 康臨芳;買賣不破租賃相關(guān)問題探討[J];法律適用;2005年11期

4 黃曉林,張國華;不動產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)與租賃權(quán)的沖突與協(xié)調(diào)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2002年04期

5 王麗;;淺談房屋租賃權(quán)的對抗力[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2007年05期

6 張澤忠;有關(guān)抵押權(quán)與租賃權(quán)效力的法理分析[J];江西社會科學(xué);2001年08期

7 梁慧星;;融資性租賃契約法性質(zhì)論[J];法學(xué)研究;1992年04期

8 王利明;試論我國不動產(chǎn)登記制度的完善(上)[J];求索;2001年05期

9 王利明;試論我國不動產(chǎn)登記制度的完善(下)[J];求索;2001年06期

10 董學(xué)立;論租賃權(quán)的性質(zhì)[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張韻琴;論買賣不破租賃[D];山西大學(xué);2004年

2 胡衛(wèi)國;論買賣不破租賃規(guī)則[D];湘潭大學(xué);2006年

3 姜振國;論買賣不破租賃規(guī)則[D];蘇州大學(xué);2008年

本文編號：2153179