【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣法律問(wèn)題在整體上屬于電子商務(wù)法律問(wèn)題的一個(gè)分支，同時(shí)也屬于《合同法》分則中的一種特殊買賣形式，2012年首例網(wǎng)絡(luò)司法拍賣引起的爭(zhēng)議也需要法律進(jìn)行擴(kuò)展性的反思。自從eBay成為第一家有名的網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣平臺(tái)以來(lái)，世界各國(guó)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣業(yè)務(wù)得到迅速發(fā)展，這甚至在很大程度上打破能力傳統(tǒng)拍賣行業(yè)幾百年的壟斷歷史。我國(guó)隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的普及已經(jīng)成為世界網(wǎng)民最多的國(guó)家，網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣業(yè)務(wù)也非�；馃幔欢诰W(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣繁榮的背后也存在許多爭(zhēng)議。目前國(guó)內(nèi)對(duì)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣的定義，主要是認(rèn)為網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣僅僅是傳統(tǒng)拍賣在不同媒介上的同一種表現(xiàn)形式。然而，國(guó)外各國(guó)普遍在討論，網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣到底能否稱為拍賣？在這一爭(zhēng)議解決上，有些國(guó)家和地區(qū)是直接通過(guò)修改拍賣法而將網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣納入到拍賣法的監(jiān)管范圍，另外有些國(guó)家和地區(qū)則是嚴(yán)格解釋舊法來(lái)區(qū)分對(duì)待網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣和傳統(tǒng)拍賣。筆者認(rèn)為，在大陸法系的嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)法律邏輯推理下，我國(guó)要恰如其分的監(jiān)管網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣，，必須通過(guò)對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣單獨(dú)立法監(jiān)管或者在電子商務(wù)立法上將網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣單獨(dú)立法進(jìn)行規(guī)范。在我國(guó)目前網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣還處于發(fā)展的初期，筆者認(rèn)為必要探討網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣法律關(guān)系的主體資格規(guī)則的完善、網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣中合同的成立與撤銷規(guī)則、網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣中的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范規(guī)則。目前的網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣中，欺詐、銷售違禁品、賭博性拍賣等比較常見，這些行為都存在重大的社會(huì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，需要進(jìn)行特殊防范。另外，對(duì)于競(jìng)拍人的權(quán)益保護(hù)，應(yīng)該通過(guò)對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣的立法完善，原則上賦予網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣的競(jìng)買人以“消費(fèi)者”地位，對(duì)于特殊的網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣不能獲得“消費(fèi)者”地位的應(yīng)該通過(guò)立法明確列出。本文最終認(rèn)為，網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣相比于傳統(tǒng)拍賣具有重大的法律差別，需要通過(guò)立法進(jìn)行規(guī)制，尤其需要協(xié)調(diào)網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣與《拍賣法》的關(guān)系、與《消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)法》的關(guān)系，同時(shí)對(duì)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣的一些具體程序規(guī)則作出標(biāo)準(zhǔn)性規(guī)范，以求定紛止?fàn)帯?br/>[Abstract]:The legal problem of online auction belongs to a branch of the legal problem of electronic commerce as a whole. At the same time, it also belongs to a special form of trading in the sub-rule of contract Law. The controversy caused by the first online judicial auction in 2012 also needs to be reconsidered by expanding the law. Since eBay became the first famous online auction platform, the online auction business in the world has developed rapidly, which even breaks the monopoly history of the traditional auction industry for hundreds of years. With the popularity of the Internet, China has become the world's largest number of Internet users, online auction business is also very hot, but there are many disputes behind the prosperity of online auction. At present, the definition of online auction in China is that it is only the same form of traditional auction in different media. However, many countries abroad are discussing whether online auction can be called auction after all. In the settlement of this dispute, some countries and regions directly modify the auction law to bring the online auction into the scope of the auction law, while others strictly interpret the old law to distinguish between the online auction and the traditional auction. The author thinks that under the strict legal logic reasoning of the continental law system, in order to supervise the network auction properly, we must regulate the network auction separately through the legislation of the network auction or the legislation of the electronic commerce. At present, the online auction in our country is still in the early stage of development, the author thinks that it is necessary to discuss the perfection of the subject qualification rules of the legal relationship of the network auction, the rules of the establishment and revocation of the contract in the network auction, and the rules of risk prevention in the network auction. At present, fraud, sale of contraband, gambling auction and so on are more common in online auction. These behaviors have significant social risks and need to be taken special precautions. In addition, for the protection of bidders' rights and interests, we should improve the legislation on online auctions, and in principle give the bidders of online auctions the status of "consumers". Specific online auctions that fail to obtain "consumer" status should be specified by legislation. In the end, this paper holds that the online auction has a significant legal difference compared with the traditional auction, and it needs to be regulated by legislation, especially to coordinate the relationship between the online auction and the auction law, and the relationship between the online auction and the Consumer Rights and interests Protection Law. At the same time, some specific procedural rules of network auction are standardized in order to settle disputes.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱廣新;;意思表示錯(cuò)誤之撤銷與相對(duì)人的信賴保護(hù)[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

2 李穎琳;網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣的法律問(wèn)題與監(jiān)管對(duì)策[J];中國(guó)工商管理研究;2001年01期

3 陳濱;余源志;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣的法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及對(duì)策[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2009年29期

4 林瑞珠;王萍;;關(guān)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣重要爭(zhēng)議問(wèn)題的探討[J];商業(yè)時(shí)代;2008年10期

5 班天可;;論民法上的法律錯(cuò)誤 對(duì)德國(guó)法和日本法的比較研究[J];中外法學(xué);2011年05期

6 王永強(qiáng);;網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣的法律規(guī)制探討[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年06期

7 張雨林;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣的法律性質(zhì)分析及規(guī)范思考[J];信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全;2006年10期

8 趙守江;;民法上的過(guò)失程度新探[J];煙臺(tái)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

9 王利明;對(duì)《合同法》格式條款規(guī)定的評(píng)析[J];政法論壇;1999年06期

10 隋彭生;關(guān)于合同法中“重大誤解”的探討[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);1999年03期

本文編號(hào)：2148312