【摘要】：傳統(tǒng)合同損害賠償中的利益分為期待利益、信賴?yán)婧突貜?fù)利益,它們都嚴(yán)格以"受害方的損害"為中心。實踐中,所獲利益賠償作為一種獨立的賠償利益已經(jīng)獲得某些國家司法實踐的認(rèn)可。所獲利益存在的根據(jù)在于這種利益能夠更好地實現(xiàn)合同利益均衡以及合同法的目的和政策,因為合同法基于某些原因不可避免地具有行為禁止或威懾的功能。所獲利益賠償具有比較獨特的構(gòu)成要件,該構(gòu)成要件強調(diào)違約人獲得利益、違約人獲得利益與違約行為之間有因果關(guān)系以及期待利益賠償不能實現(xiàn)合同目的或合同法的目的。傳統(tǒng)的損害賠償模式不能有效解釋在實踐中應(yīng)賦予所獲利益賠償?shù)念愋�。�?dāng)然,所獲賠償沒有也不可能顛覆傳統(tǒng)的損害賠償原則,但確實提供了有力補充。
[Abstract]:The interests in the traditional contract damage compensation are divided into expectation interest, trust interest and recovery interest, which are strictly centered on the "injured party's damage". In practice, the benefit compensation as an independent compensation interest has been recognized by the judicial practice of some countries. The existence of benefits is based on the fact that such interests can better achieve the balance of contract interests and the purpose and policy of contract law, because the contract law inevitably has the function of prohibition or deterrence for some reasons. The benefit compensation obtained has a relatively unique constitutive element, which emphasizes that the defaulter obtains the benefit, that there is a causal relationship between the breaching party's interest and the breach of contract, and that the expected interest compensation cannot achieve the purpose of the contract or the contract law. The traditional damage compensation model can not effectively explain the types of benefit compensation that should be given in practice. Of course, the compensation received does not and cannot subvert the traditional principle of damages, but it does provide a powerful complement.
【作者單位】： 吉林大學(xué)法學(xué)院
【基金】：教育部人文社會科學(xué)青年項目“合同法中信息披露義務(wù)的研究”(06JC82005) 吉林大學(xué)人文社會科學(xué)青年項目“從文本到語境”(2007QN005)
【分類號】：D913

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 鐘奇江;;論非財產(chǎn)性損害合同救濟正當(dāng)性的理論基礎(chǔ)[J];理論探討;2006年01期

2 鐘奇江;;論非財產(chǎn)性損害的合同救濟[J];湘潭師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2006年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李靖源;我國行政合同救濟制度初探[D];延邊大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：2129925