發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-03 10:36

  本文選題：懲罰性賠償 + 合同領(lǐng)域�。� 參考：《廣西師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：懲罰性賠償制度這一制度是源于英美法系,在英國(guó)、美國(guó)中運(yùn)用的較廣泛。至今已有二百多年的歷史。雖然懲罰性賠償制度在英美法系的國(guó)家中有較大的爭(zhēng)議,但是不能否認(rèn)的是懲罰性賠償制度在英美法系的國(guó)家中發(fā)揮了重要的作用,特別是在合同也發(fā)揮了較大的作用。大陸法系的國(guó)家對(duì)合同中適用懲罰性賠償制度一直存在著爭(zhēng)議,懲罰性賠償制度在大陸法系的國(guó)家或地區(qū)使用的較少,但英美法系國(guó)家懲罰性賠償制度在合同中有較為廣泛的運(yùn)用,并取得了較大的效果。本文探究將懲罰性賠償制度沿用到我國(guó)的合同領(lǐng)域中。本文根據(jù)懲罰性賠償?shù)闹贫鹊墓δ�、價(jià)值,并結(jié)合我國(guó)合同領(lǐng)域內(nèi)懲罰性賠償制度的現(xiàn)狀對(duì)懲罰性賠償制度進(jìn)行了評(píng)析,然后提出了針對(duì)性的建議,以力求完善我國(guó)合同領(lǐng)域內(nèi)的懲罰性賠償制度。具體而言,全文分為五個(gè)部分。本文的引言部分闡述了懲罰性賠償制度在英美法系國(guó)家中使用較為廣泛,在大陸法系的國(guó)家或地區(qū)中懲罰性賠償這一制度也開(kāi)始逐漸的適用,并且在合同領(lǐng)域內(nèi)適用懲罰性賠償制度是大勢(shì)所趨,具有較為深遠(yuǎn)的意義。本文的第一部分“懲罰性賠償制度的概述”,該部分首先對(duì)懲罰性賠償制度進(jìn)行了定義,并論述了懲罰性賠償制度的特征,其次,還探究了懲罰性賠償制度的功能,再次還探究了懲罰性賠償制度與補(bǔ)償性賠償制度,二者的聯(lián)系與區(qū)別。最后還初步探討了侵權(quán)懲罰性賠償制度和合同懲罰性賠償制度的關(guān)系,二者的聯(lián)系與區(qū)別。從中我們可以看出,懲罰性賠償制度有其自身的一些特點(diǎn),懲罰性賠償制度與補(bǔ)償性賠償制度二者之間存在著緊密的聯(lián)系。本文的第二部分“懲罰性賠償制度的理論基礎(chǔ)”,該部分探討了懲罰性賠償制度的價(jià)值；懲罰性賠償制度與合同法相關(guān)原則的爭(zhēng)議；懲罰性賠償制度在合同領(lǐng)域內(nèi)適用的各種學(xué)說(shuō)；最后得出懲罰性賠償制度在合同領(lǐng)域內(nèi)適用之我的看法。懲罰性賠償制度引入到合同中,存在著一定的爭(zhēng)議,主要爭(zhēng)議的焦點(diǎn)是合同法是私法,懲罰性賠償制度帶有一定的公法色彩,將懲罰性賠償制度引入到合同中,對(duì)合同進(jìn)行調(diào)整,懲處的力度較大,不利于市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的有序進(jìn)行。在此部分中筆者對(duì)懲罰性賠償制度進(jìn)行了一系列的分析和探討,最后得出了自己的看法。本文的第三部分“懲罰性賠償制度的比較分析”,該部分先是對(duì)我國(guó)古代和近代中的懲罰性賠償制度進(jìn)行了探析,然后是對(duì)英美法系典型的國(guó)家即英國(guó)、美國(guó)；大陸法系典型的國(guó)家或地區(qū)即德國(guó)、臺(tái)灣地區(qū)懲罰性賠償制度在合同領(lǐng)域內(nèi)的適用進(jìn)行了初步的探析。最后得出國(guó)外的國(guó)家或地區(qū)在合同領(lǐng)域內(nèi)適用懲罰性賠償制度對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示。筆者認(rèn)為對(duì)其他國(guó)家或地區(qū)合同領(lǐng)域內(nèi)適用懲罰性賠償制度進(jìn)行初步探討,對(duì)我國(guó)具有一定的借鑒意義。本文的第四部分“合同領(lǐng)域中適用懲罰性賠償制度的立法現(xiàn)狀及實(shí)施的可行性與必要性”,該部分先是對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)在合同領(lǐng)域內(nèi)懲罰性賠償制度的立法現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了探討和分析,然后對(duì)在我國(guó)合同領(lǐng)域內(nèi)建立懲罰性賠償制度的可行性和必要性進(jìn)行了一系列的探討和評(píng)析。本文的第五部分“完善我國(guó)合同領(lǐng)域中適用的懲罰性賠償制度”,該部分是筆者對(duì)我國(guó)合同領(lǐng)域內(nèi)懲罰性賠償制度的完善提出了自己的一些建議。主要是從懲罰性賠償制度的適用范圍、適用條件、賠償數(shù)額、司法程序這幾個(gè)方面提出了自己的一些看法。本文最后為“結(jié)語(yǔ)”部分,現(xiàn)階段懲罰性賠償制度在合同領(lǐng)域的適用存在著一些缺陷,但懲罰性賠償制度在我國(guó)合同領(lǐng)域內(nèi)的適用有一定的可行性和必要性,我國(guó)有必要從適用范圍,適用條件,賠償數(shù)額,司法程序這幾個(gè)方面對(duì)合同領(lǐng)域內(nèi)的懲罰性賠償制度進(jìn)行完善和發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The system of punitive damages is derived from the common law system, in the United Kingdom and in the United States. It has been more than 200 years old. Although the punitive damages system has great controversy in the countries of Anglo American law system, it can not be denied that the punitive damages system has played an important role in the countries of Anglo American law system. Especially in the contract also played a larger role. The countries of the continental law system have been disputed on the application of punitive damages in the contract, and the punitive compensation system is used less in the countries or regions of the continental law system, but the punitive damages system in the Anglo American legal system has been widely used in the contract and has made a great deal. This article explores the system of punitive damages in the field of contract in China. Based on the function and value of the system of punitive damages, this paper analyses the system of punitive damages in the light of the status of punitive damages in the field of contract in our country, and then puts forward the suggestion of needling, in order to perfect the field of contract in our country. In particular, the full text is divided into five parts. The introduction part of this paper states that punitive damages system is widely used in Anglo American countries, and punitive damages in the countries or regions of the continental law system are gradually applied, and the punitive damages system is applied in the field of contract. The first part of this article, "a summary of the system of punitive damages", first defined the punitive compensation system and discussed the characteristics of the punitive compensation system. Secondly, it also explored the function of the punitive compensation system and explored the system and compensation of punitive damages again. The relationship and difference between the two parties. Finally, the relationship between the punitive damages system and the punitive compensation system of the contract is preliminarily discussed, and the relations and differences between the two are also discussed. From this, we can see that the punitive damages system has its own characteristics, and there exists between the punitive compensation system and the compensatory compensation system between the two. The second part of this article, "the theoretical foundation of the punitive damages system", discusses the value of punitive damages system, the dispute on the principle of the punitive compensation system and the contract law, the various theories applicable to the punitive damages system in the contract field; finally, the punitive damages system is found in the contract field. The punitive compensation system is introduced into the contract, there are certain disputes. The focus of the main dispute is that the contract law is private law, the punitive damages system has a certain public law color, the punitive compensation system is introduced into the contract, the contract is adjusted, the punishment is great, it is not conducive to the order of the market economy. In this part, the author makes a series of analysis and Discussion on the system of punitive damages, and finally draws his own opinion. The third part of this article, "a comparative analysis of punitive damages", first analyses the punitive damages system in ancient and modern China, and then it is typical of the Anglo American law system. The state or the United States, the United States, the typical countries or regions of the continental law system, that is, the punitive damages system in the Taiwan area, in the contract field, has been preliminarily discussed. Finally, the Enlightenment of the punitive damages system applied in the foreign countries or regions in the contract field is drawn. The author thinks that the contract of other countries or regions is the contract. A preliminary discussion on the application of punitive damages in the field has a certain reference significance to our country. The fourth part of this article, "the legislative status of punitive damages in the field of contract and the feasibility and necessity of its implementation", is the first part of the legislative status of the punitive compensation system in the present contract domain of China. This paper discusses and analyzes the feasibility and necessity of establishing punitive damages in the field of contract in China. The fifth part of this article "consummates the punitive damages system applicable in the field of China's contract". This part is the author's perfection of punitive damages system in the field of China's contract. Some suggestions are put forward, mainly from the scope of the application of punitive damages, the conditions of application, the amount of compensation and the judicial procedure. At the end of this article, there are some defects in the application of punitive damages in the field of contract at the present stage, but the system of punitive damages The application of the contract in our country has certain feasibility and necessity. It is necessary for us to improve and develop the system of punitive damages in the field of contract, such as the scope of application, the applicable conditions, the amount of compensation and the judicial procedure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.294;D923

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉仲秋,王賀洋;懲罰性賠償制度的應(yīng)用[J];西南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期

2 程愛(ài)軍;;懲罰性賠償制度的民族適應(yīng)性分析[J];中共太原市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

3 龔斌;;論我國(guó)懲罰性賠償制度的立法完善[J];湖南財(cái)經(jīng)高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

4 陽(yáng)高峰;朱玉;;論我國(guó)懲罰性賠償制度的建立[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2006年28期

5 于斌;;懲罰性賠償制度研究[J];科技經(jīng)濟(jì)市場(chǎng);2006年12期

6 房文靜;;淺論我國(guó)懲罰性賠償制度的建立[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年01期

7 邢希萌;;淺談懲罰性賠償制度的完善[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2007年06期

8 于朝印;;美國(guó)懲罰性賠償制度探析——兼論懲罰性賠償制度在我國(guó)立法中的確立[J];中國(guó)礦業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年04期

9 李杰;;對(duì)懲罰性賠償制度的思考[J];畢節(jié)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

10 戴江波;;試論懲罰性賠償制度[J];山西警官高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前9條

1 柯新華;;試論我國(guó)懲罰性賠償制度的構(gòu)建[A];規(guī)劃·規(guī)范·規(guī)則——第六屆中國(guó)律師論壇優(yōu)秀論文集[C];2006年

2 羅冠杰;;論懲罰性賠償制度在我國(guó)藥品安全責(zé)任領(lǐng)域的建立[A];2009年中國(guó)藥學(xué)會(huì)藥事管理專(zhuān)業(yè)委員會(huì)年會(huì)暨“國(guó)家藥物政策與《藥品管理法》修訂研究”論壇論文文集[C];2009年

3 王阿麗;;商品房買(mǎi)賣(mài)中懲罰性賠償制度分析[A];規(guī)劃·規(guī)范·規(guī)則——第六屆中國(guó)律師論壇優(yōu)秀論文集[C];2006年

4 沈薇;;論電視購(gòu)物買(mǎi)賣(mài)中的懲罰性賠償制度[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇（二○一○年第1輯）[C];2010年

5 趙欣怡;;《環(huán)境保護(hù)法》修改之環(huán)境法律責(zé)任的完善——淺析懲罰性賠償制度對(duì)環(huán)境民事侵權(quán)責(zé)任的借鑒[A];可持續(xù)發(fā)展·環(huán)境保護(hù)·防災(zāi)減災(zāi)——2012年全國(guó)環(huán)境資源法學(xué)研究會(huì)（年會(huì)）論文集[C];2012年

6 周晉凌;李s，

本文編號(hào)：2093356