本文選題：瑕疵股權(quán) + 股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓　； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓糾紛的焦點一般是股權(quán)何時在當(dāng)事人之間實際變動、受讓人是否可以行使撤銷權(quán)以及如何行使撤銷權(quán)和瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓后的民事責(zé)任如何分配等。我國《公司法》對此并沒有作出明確規(guī)定,雖然于2011年施行的《最高人民法院關(guān)于適用(中華人民共和國公司法若干問題的規(guī)定(三)》(以下簡稱《公司法司法解釋三》)對此有專門涉及,并對瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓后責(zé)任的承擔(dān)作出了明確規(guī)定,然而其對與瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的相關(guān)重要問題,如公司章程和股東會決議是否可以限制瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓、限制的效力是否及于受讓人；瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓后的股權(quán)何時變動；瑕疵股權(quán)受讓人是否可以行使撤銷權(quán)及如何行使撤銷權(quán)以及瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓后民事責(zé)任的具體承擔(dān)等,還沒有作出明確規(guī)定。因此,現(xiàn)行規(guī)定對徹底解決瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的相關(guān)問題還遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不夠,這就可能導(dǎo)致以后的司法實踐中,對同一類案件作出不同甚至截然相反的判決,影響司法的統(tǒng)一和權(quán)威。 本文除引言和結(jié)束語外,共分四個部分,其主要內(nèi)容如下： 第一部分瑕疵股權(quán)可轉(zhuǎn)讓性分析。首先將目前學(xué)術(shù)界對瑕疵股權(quán)是否可以轉(zhuǎn)讓的學(xué)說爭議予以梳理。其次,對上述學(xué)說爭議作了簡單評析,并在結(jié)合世界主要發(fā)達(dá)國家對瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的立法例的基礎(chǔ)上,筆者贊同“瑕疵股權(quán)限制轉(zhuǎn)讓說”,認(rèn)為根據(jù)權(quán)利與義務(wù)相一致原則,在承認(rèn)瑕疵股權(quán)可以轉(zhuǎn)讓的基礎(chǔ)上,股東會決議或者公司章程可以對其進(jìn)行一定的限制。 第二部分瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的效力。首先論述了公司章程和股東會決議對瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓作出的相應(yīng)限制,并探討了除權(quán)程序的適用。其次認(rèn)為受讓人并不負(fù)有嚴(yán)格的審查義務(wù),應(yīng)以“區(qū)分對待說”來具體判定股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同的效力；對股權(quán)實際變動,筆者認(rèn)為應(yīng)以公司內(nèi)部變更登記為準(zhǔn)。 第三部分瑕疵股權(quán)受讓人行使撤銷權(quán)的條件。首先對善意受讓人行使撤銷權(quán)的條件應(yīng)當(dāng)根據(jù)瑕疵股權(quán)的瑕疵程度來具體情況具體分析,同時還要結(jié)合受讓人受讓股權(quán)的行為受到出資瑕疵的影響程度來判斷。其次認(rèn)為有必要將瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的生效時間作為受讓股東行使撤銷權(quán)除斥期間的起算點,并將除斥期間縮短為六個月,甚至是更短的三個月。 第四部分瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓后的民事責(zé)任的承擔(dān)。筆者認(rèn)為應(yīng)區(qū)分不同的權(quán)利主體來具體分析：對公司的民事責(zé)任應(yīng)由轉(zhuǎn)讓人和受讓人承擔(dān)連帶責(zé)任,責(zé)任的范圍包括補繳出資責(zé)任和損害賠償責(zé)任,且補繳出資責(zé)任不受訴訟時效的限制。對公司債權(quán)人的民事責(zé)任由轉(zhuǎn)讓雙方承擔(dān)連帶責(zé)任,責(zé)任的范圍以股東瑕疵出資的本金和同期銀行貸款利息為限。責(zé)任承擔(dān)的方式可以借鑒我國公司催告程序和按比例受償?shù)姆绞絹硖幚�。對足額出資股東的民事責(zé)任為違約責(zé)任,應(yīng)由轉(zhuǎn)讓人獨自承擔(dān),違約責(zé)任的范圍由公司章程或者合同約定,沒有約定的按照合同法的相關(guān)規(guī)定處理。
[Abstract]:The focus of the dispute on the transfer of defective shares is usually when the equity is changed between the parties, whether the assignee can exercise the right of revocation, how to exercise the right of revocation and how to distribute the civil liability after the transfer of the defective shares. The provisions on the application (three) of the People's Republic of China Company Law (hereinafter referred to as the three > the legal interpretation of the company law) are specifically involved, and the responsibility for the transfer of the defective shares is clearly defined. However, the relevant issues relating to the transfer of defective shares, such as the limitation of the company's constitution and the resolution of the shareholders' meeting, may be limited. The effect of the transfer of defective shares, whether the validity of the restriction is passed to the assignee, the change of the stock right after the transfer of the defective shares, and whether the transferee of the defective shares can exercise the right of revocation, how to exercise the right of revocation and the concrete burden of the civil liability after the transfer of the defective stock right, and so on. The problems related to the transfer of defective shares are far from enough. This may lead to a different or even contrary judgment on the same kind of cases in the judicial practice in the future, which affects the unity and authority of the judiciary.
In addition to the preface and the concluding remark, this article is divided into four parts. The main contents are as follows:
The first part is the analysis of the transferability of defective shares. First, the academic debate on whether the defective shares can be transferable. Secondly, a brief analysis of the above theory is made, and on the basis of the legislation of the transfer of defective shares in the major developed countries of the world, the author agrees with the theory of "the transfer of defective shares" According to the principle of agreement between rights and obligations, the shareholder meeting resolution or the company's articles of association can be restricted to a certain extent on the basis of the recognition of the transferable transfer of defective shares.
The second part is the validity of the transfer of defective shares. First, it discusses the corresponding restrictions on the transfer of defective shares by the company's articles of association and the resolution of the shareholders' meeting, and discusses the application of the procedure of removing the right. Secondly, it is considered that the Assignee does not have a strict obligation to examine it. In actual change, the author thinks that the change of company registration shall prevail.
The third part is the condition of the revocation right of the blemish equity holder. First, the conditions for the exercise of the right of revocation to the bona fide assignee should be analyzed concretely according to the defect degree of the defective shares. At the same time, the behavior of the assignee should be judged by the influence range of the defective capital. Secondly, it is necessary to make the defective stock. The effective time of transfer of right is the starting point of the period when the transferee exercised the right of revocation, and it will be shortened to six months or even three months.
The fourth part of the civil liability after the defective equity transfer. The author thinks that the different rights subject should be divided into specific analysis: the civil liability of the company should be jointly and severally liable for the transferor and the assignee, and the scope of the liability includes the payment of contribution liability and the liability for damages, and the liability for contribution is not limited by the limitation of the limitation of action. The civil liability of the creditors of a company is jointly and severally liable by the transferee. The scope of the liability is limited to the principal of the shareholders' defects and the interest of the bank loans at the same time. The way to undertake the responsibility can be dealt with by the procedures of our company and the method of proportionate compensation. The liability for the civil liability of the full shareholders shall be the liability for breach of contract. The scope of liability for breach of contract shall be handled by the transferor solely in accordance with the relevant provisions of the contract law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 邢丹丹;瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的效力[D];鄭州大學(xué);2013年

2 張智君;有限責(zé)任公司出資瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓法律問題研究[D];河北大學(xué);2013年

3 宋文靜;有限責(zé)任公司瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓法律問題研究[D];四川省社會科學(xué)院;2013年

，

本文編號：2033183