本文選題：無效合同 + 訴訟時(shí)效�。� 參考：《蘇州大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：無效合同的訴訟時(shí)效適用問題一直都是理論界和實(shí)務(wù)界爭(zhēng)議較大的問題。爭(zhēng)議的焦點(diǎn)是訴訟實(shí)效制度是否應(yīng)當(dāng)適用于無效合同的確認(rèn)，合同被確認(rèn)無效之后產(chǎn)生的相關(guān)請(qǐng)求權(quán)是否應(yīng)當(dāng)適用訴訟時(shí)效制度。如果適用，訴訟時(shí)效期間怎么計(jì)算。我國(guó)《合同法》及相關(guān)的司法解釋都沒有對(duì)這些問題做出明確的規(guī)定，然而我國(guó)法學(xué)界也未能對(duì)這些問題形成統(tǒng)一的認(rèn)識(shí)，從而導(dǎo)致同類的案件在不同的法官的審理下產(chǎn)生截然相反的結(jié)果。本文在闡述我國(guó)目前實(shí)務(wù)界和理論界對(duì)無效合同確認(rèn)是否適用訴訟時(shí)效問題的不同觀點(diǎn)并進(jìn)行評(píng)析之后，筆者提出自己的觀點(diǎn)，即無效合同確認(rèn)適用訴訟時(shí)效制度。筆者從法律的秩序與正義價(jià)值選擇、法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)原理、訴訟時(shí)效的客體三個(gè)方面論證了無效合同確認(rèn)應(yīng)當(dāng)適用訴訟時(shí)效制度。合同被確認(rèn)無效之后會(huì)產(chǎn)生返還財(cái)產(chǎn)、賠償損失等請(qǐng)求權(quán)，賠償損失產(chǎn)生于締約過失責(zé)任，，屬于債權(quán)請(qǐng)求權(quán)，理所當(dāng)然適用訴訟時(shí)效制度。而返還財(cái)產(chǎn)請(qǐng)求權(quán)，筆者認(rèn)為應(yīng)區(qū)別動(dòng)產(chǎn)與登記的不動(dòng)產(chǎn)和未登記的不動(dòng)產(chǎn)不同情況而確定是否適用訴訟時(shí)效。無效合同的確認(rèn)的訴訟時(shí)效期間應(yīng)從合同履行期限屆滿計(jì)算，沒有約定履行期且不能確定履行期的，從權(quán)利人第一次主張權(quán)利而義務(wù)人拒絕時(shí)起算。無效合同被確認(rèn)無效之后，所有物返還請(qǐng)求權(quán)和賠償損失的請(qǐng)求權(quán)時(shí)效期間應(yīng)當(dāng)從合同被確認(rèn)無效時(shí)計(jì)算。
[Abstract]:The problem of the application of the limitation of action in an invalid contract has always been a controversial issue in the theoretical and practical circles. The focus of the dispute is whether the litigation effectiveness system should be applied to the confirmation of the invalid contract. Whether the relevant claim should be applicable after the confirmation of the contract has been invalid. If it is applicable, what is the period of the limitation of action Our country's law circles have not made a clear understanding of these issues, but the law circles in our country have failed to form a unified understanding of these problems, which leads to the opposite results of the similar cases under the trial of different judges. After the different views on the validity of an invalid contract to confirm the validity of the limitation of action, the author puts forward his own view, that is, the application of the system of limitation of action in the confirmation of invalid contracts. The author argues that the confirmation of the invalid contract should be applicable from three aspects of the order of the law and the choice of the value of justice, the principle of law and economics and the object of the limitation of action. The system of the limitation of first instance. After the contract is confirmed to be invalid, it will produce the return of property, compensation for the claim, and the loss of the loss arising from the liability for fault in the contracting parties, which belongs to the claim of claim, and, of course, applies the system of limitation of action. To determine whether or not the limitation of limitation of action applies. The period of limitation of action for the confirmation of an invalid contract shall be calculated from the expiration of the expiration of the term of performance of the contract, without an agreement on the period of performance and that the period of performance cannot be determined, from the time when the right holder first claims the right and the obligee refuses it. After the invalid contract is confirmed to be invalid, the claim and the compensation for the loss of the property are returned. The time limit for the right of claim shall be calculated from the time when the contract is confirmed invalid.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 鄒海林;不當(dāng)?shù)美?qǐng)求權(quán)與其他請(qǐng)求權(quán)的競(jìng)合[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2000年01期

2 方一青;;無效合同認(rèn)定適用訴訟時(shí)效之思辨[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年02期

3 龐小菊;無效合同的訴訟時(shí)效問題芻議[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期

4 張耕;鄧宏光;;無效合同性質(zhì)之反思與重構(gòu)[J];求索;2006年02期

5 王利明;關(guān)于無效合同確認(rèn)的若干問題[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2002年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 孟晉;論無效合同與訴訟時(shí)效的適用[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年

2 陸曉燕;論訴訟時(shí)效的適用范圍[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

3 方一青;無效合同認(rèn)定不適用訴訟時(shí)效之理論思辨[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

4 管洪博;論無效合同的訴訟時(shí)效制度[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：1990741