發(fā)布時間：2018-05-18 06:16

  本文選題：FOB + 保險��； 參考：《上海海事大學》2005年碩士論文

【摘要】：許多專家給出建議,對外貿易中,為更好地保護自己的利益,我國的出口商(賣方)最好與國外買家訂立CIF合同。但由于各種原因,我國出口商與外國買家訂立的絕大多數是FOB合同。 本文便針對國際貿易中我國出口商與國外買家訂立的絕大多數是FOB合同的貿易實踐,以更好地保護我國出口商的利益為目的,從保險的角度對FOB術語下的整個運輸過程進行分析,尋求保護的方法。然而,我國目前的海上保險研究大多是比較概括的,并未具體針對某一類型的合同進行研究。所以,可以說這是一個全新的課題。 針對這一課題,本文采用縱向研究的方法,把FOB術語下的整個運輸過程按時間先后分成四區(qū)段,提出賣方在各運輸區(qū)段應注意的貨物保險問題。在我國已加入WTO和英國協(xié)會保單被越來越廣泛應用在保險市場與國際貿易領域的大形勢下,筆者又嘗試應用實證分析方法和比較研究的方法,通過引用大量的中外案例,深入分析英國《1906年海上保險法》、《2000年國際貿易術語解釋通則》、《聯合國國際貨物銷售合同公約》及其他相關法律的規(guī)定,并結合我國《保險法》、《合同法》等法律探討賣方在各運輸區(qū)段應注意的貨物保險問題及其解決方法。 本文首先在第一章里,帶著“FOB合同為何有如此大的魅力”的疑問,探討了FOB合同在運費和保險費因素上的優(yōu)勢;同時,也分析了FOB合同下的三類主要風險,這三類風險是賣方在FOB合同的各運輸區(qū)段所遇風險的概括,正是它們誘發(fā)了各區(qū)段中的保險問題。 由于可保利益對本課題研究的重要性,接著在第二章對FOB合同下可保利益的相關問題進行了研究,以期對下文分區(qū)段的探討起到建構基礎的作用。 隨后的四章是本文的重點。本文按FOB的整個運輸過程先后要經過的四區(qū)段,每一章對應一區(qū)段,分別探討了賣方應注意的保險問題及其解決方法。 第三章指出區(qū)段1中保險的“真空地帶”:一方面,買方由于未承擔風險而不具有可保利益,不能向保險公司索賠;另一方面,賣方雖承擔風險,但并未投保,也不能向保險公司索賠。對此,本文給出了三種解決方法。 第四章討論了三個問題。首先,分析賣方的通知義務。分別引用英國和我國的案例,論證賣方并非必須履行通知義務,然而考慮法律明確的措詞,建議賣方最好照發(fā)通知。然后,討論整船貨裝船完畢前發(fā)生滅失時的可保利益。通過兩個相似案例的比
[Abstract]:Many experts suggest that in order to better protect their own interests in foreign trade, our exporters (sellers) had better conclude CIF contracts with foreign buyers. However, for various reasons, the vast majority of our exporters and foreign buyers are FOB contracts. This paper aims at the fact that most of the FOB contracts concluded between Chinese exporters and foreign buyers in international trade are aimed at better protecting the interests of Chinese exporters. From the point of view of insurance, the whole transportation process under FOB terminology is analyzed and the method of protection is sought. However, most of the current marine insurance studies in China are relatively general, not specific to a certain type of contract research. Therefore, it can be said that this is a new topic. Aiming at this problem, this paper adopts the method of longitudinal research, divides the whole transportation process under FOB term into four sections according to time, and puts forward the cargo insurance problem that the seller should pay attention to in each transportation section. Under the situation that our country has joined the WTO and the British Association policy has been more and more widely used in the field of insurance market and international trade, the author also tries to apply the empirical analysis method and the comparative research method, through quoting a large number of Chinese and foreign cases. An in-depth analysis of the provisions of the British Maritime Insurance Law of 1906, the principles for the interpretation of International Trade terms of 2000, the United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Sale of goods and other relevant laws, Combined with the law of insurance law and contract law of our country, this paper probes into the problem of cargo insurance which should be paid attention to by sellers in each transportation section and the solution to it. In the first chapter, with the question of "why FOB contract has such great charm", this paper discusses the advantages of FOB contract in freight and insurance factors, and also analyzes three kinds of main risks under FOB contract. These three kinds of risks are the generalization of the risks encountered by the seller in each transport section of the FOB contract, and they lead to the insurance problem in each section. Because of the importance of insurable interest to the research of this subject, the second chapter studies the related problems of insurable interest under FOB contract, in order to construct the foundation for the discussion of the following subsections. The following four chapters are the emphases of this paper. In this paper, according to the four sections of the whole FOB transportation process, each chapter corresponds to one section, and discusses the insurance problems that the seller should pay attention to and how to solve them. Chapter III states the "vacuum zone" of insurance in section 1: on the one hand, the buyer is unable to claim compensation from the insurance company because he does not bear the risk; on the other hand, the seller does not take the risk, but is not insured, Nor can you claim a claim from an insurance company. In this paper, three solutions are given. Chapter four discusses three problems. First of all, the seller's obligation to notify is analyzed. Citing the cases of England and China respectively, the author argues that the seller is not obliged to perform the obligation of notice. However, considering the clear wording of the law, it is suggested that the seller should follow the notice. Then, the insurable benefits in case of loss before shipment is completed are discussed. By comparing two similar cases
【學位授予單位】：上海海事大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2005
【分類號】：D922.284;D922.294

【引證文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 陶陶;;解析FOB、CFR術語下貨物船前保險[J];管理觀察;2009年16期

2 錢華生;;FOB貿易術語下賣方裝運通知對買方保險的影響[J];對外經貿實務;2013年04期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 林丹丹;論“近因”理論在我國船舶碰撞法律原因分析中的應用[D];大連海事大學;2009年

，

本文編號：1904743