本文選題：締約過失責(zé)任 + 誠實信用　； 參考：《河北大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：締約過失責(zé)任制度是誕生于近現(xiàn)代民法之合同法領(lǐng)域中得一項重要的法律的制度，它較好的解決了合同締約階段對當(dāng)事人的保護(hù)，避免了合同締結(jié)這一階段成為法律調(diào)整的空白之地。歷經(jīng)數(shù)百年的發(fā)展與完善，許多國家地區(qū)的立法、判例和學(xué)說都對該制度作出了規(guī)定，在司法領(lǐng)域與實踐領(lǐng)域得到了大家的普遍認(rèn)可。我國也不例外，我國1999年頒布的合同法對締約過失責(zé)任作出了規(guī)定，體現(xiàn)出對締約當(dāng)事人合法權(quán)益的擴大化保護(hù)，也體現(xiàn)了合同法的價值關(guān)懷。然而，我國的法制建設(shè)在不斷的發(fā)展和完善之中，，立法上不完善的規(guī)定并不能解決締約過失責(zé)任在迅猛發(fā)展的當(dāng)今社會中出現(xiàn)的問題。再加上相對于其他民事法律制度，締約過失責(zé)任制度理論基礎(chǔ)尚淺，內(nèi)容龐雜，法律規(guī)定又比較籠統(tǒng)，導(dǎo)致了在司法實踐中可操作性不強、實踐中問題重重。本文以締約過失責(zé)任制度為研究對象，以最大限度的保護(hù)締約當(dāng)事人利益為主旨，先從我國締約過失責(zé)任的現(xiàn)狀入手，對締約過失責(zé)任與相關(guān)民事制度進(jìn)行了司法界定；然后通過借鑒有關(guān)國外的法律規(guī)定及判例，在結(jié)合了本國的司法案例基礎(chǔ)之上，發(fā)現(xiàn)我國締約過失責(zé)任制度的不足，進(jìn)行反思；最后對完善締約過失責(zé)任制度提出建議與設(shè)想，以增進(jìn)我們對締約過失制度的了解，妥善解決司法實踐中所遇到的難題，為最終建立一個以誠實信用原則為基礎(chǔ)的締約過失責(zé)任制度，貢獻(xiàn)自己的綿薄之力。
[Abstract]:The system of fault liability in contracting is an important legal system born in the field of contract law of modern civil law. It solves the protection of the parties in the stage of contracting contracts. To avoid the conclusion of the contract at this stage to become a legal adjustment of the blank place. After hundreds of years of development and improvement, many countries and regions of the legislation, jurisprudence and doctrine have made provisions for the system, in the judicial field and practice has been generally recognized by everyone. China is no exception. The contract law promulgated in 1999 provides for the liability for fault in contracting, which embodies the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the contracting parties and the value concern of the contract law. However, the legal construction of our country is constantly developing and perfecting, and the imperfect provisions in legislation can not solve the problems of fault liability in the rapid development of the society. In addition, compared with other civil legal systems, the theoretical basis of the system of fault liability in contracting is still shallow, the content is complex, and the legal provisions are relatively general, which leads to the lack of maneuverability in judicial practice and the numerous problems in practice. This article regards the system of fault liability in contracting as the research object, takes the maximum protection of the interests of the contracting parties as the main idea, starts with the present situation of the fault liability in our country, and makes a judicial definition of the liability of fault in the contract and the relevant civil system. Then, by drawing lessons from the relevant foreign laws and precedents, combining the judicial cases of our country, the author finds out the deficiency of the fault liability system in our country, and finally puts forward some suggestions and ideas to perfect the fault liability system in conclusion. In order to enhance our understanding of the system of fault in contracting, properly solve the problems encountered in judicial practice, and finally establish a system of liability for fault in contracting based on the principle of good faith, we should contribute our own contribution to it.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱莉;論我國《合同法》中的締約過失責(zé)任[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2001年03期

2 吳智永,張敏;締約過失責(zé)任三題[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年02期

3 李寶軍;非財產(chǎn)損害賠償與締約過失責(zé)任[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年03期

4 王洪亮;締約過失責(zé)任的歷史嬗變[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2005年05期

5 陳朝陽;締約責(zé)任——民事責(zé)任新探[J];法學(xué);1993年12期

6 潘冬根;;我國締約過失責(zé)任的立法現(xiàn)狀及完善對策[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬);2010年04期

7 易軍;撤銷權(quán)、抗辯權(quán)抑或解除權(quán)——探析《合同法》第195條所定權(quán)利的性質(zhì)[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年05期

8 高雅;論締約過失責(zé)任制度的理論基礎(chǔ)[J];江西社會科學(xué);2002年03期

9 宋立峰;魏冬云;;我國立法中締約過失責(zé)任規(guī)定的分析及完善途徑[J];遼寧經(jīng)濟;2006年05期

10 錢玉林;試論誠信原則對締約過失責(zé)任的適用[J];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2002年01期

本文編號：1787501