本文選題：無(wú)效建筑合同　切入點(diǎn)：無(wú)資質(zhì)或超越資質(zhì)合同　出處：《商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化》2006年17期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：長(zhǎng)期以來(lái),我國(guó)建筑工程市場(chǎng)一直存在著施工企業(yè)資質(zhì)不足、施工管理秩序混亂、司法審理缺乏針對(duì)性法律文件、部分疑難案件難以定論等缺陷,這其中無(wú)效合同的管理及審理是一個(gè)關(guān)鍵性的問(wèn)題。去年最高人民法院出臺(tái)了《關(guān)于審理建設(shè)工程施工合同糾紛案件適用法律問(wèn)題的解釋》,為我國(guó)各級(jí)人民法院審理該類案件提供了具體明確的司法依據(jù),客觀上緩解了因法律規(guī)定不明導(dǎo)致部分疑難案件難以定論的現(xiàn)象。然而,《解釋》中的個(gè)別條款(如第二條)卻獨(dú)具歧意,與以往《民法通則》、《合同法》的規(guī)定以及法院和仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)以前的處理原則出現(xiàn)較大區(qū)別。本文著重就《解釋》第二條涉及的一些問(wèn)題提出質(zhì)疑。
[Abstract]:For a long time, the construction engineering market in our country has many defects, such as insufficient qualification of construction enterprises, confusion of construction management order, lack of pertinent legal documents in judicial proceedings, difficulty in determining some difficult cases, and so on. The administration and trial of invalid contracts is a key issue. Last year, the Supreme people's Court issued the interpretation of the legal issues applicable to the trial of disputes over construction contracts, which is for the people's courts at all levels in our country. The trial of such cases provides a specific and clear basis for the administration of justice. Objectively alleviates the inconclusive phenomenon of some difficult cases caused by unclear legal provisions. However, some of the articles in the interpretation (such as Article 2) have different meanings. There is a great difference between the provisions of the General principles of Civil Law and the contract Law and the previous principles of the courts and arbitration institutions. This paper puts emphasis on questioning some problems involved in Article 2 of the interpretation.
【作者單位】：
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 梁栩凌;宋平;;“驗(yàn)收合格”與“合同合法”意義之辨析[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2006年17期

，

本文編號(hào)：1651260