發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-20 08:32

  本文選題：專利聯(lián)盟　切入點(diǎn)：反壟斷法　出處：《中南民族大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：專利聯(lián)盟是市場(chǎng)對(duì)“專利叢林”現(xiàn)象的回應(yīng)，具有減輕許可費(fèi)疊加問(wèn)題、減少侵權(quán)訴訟風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及成本、清除阻礙專利等積極意義，但其也可能在相關(guān)市場(chǎng)上產(chǎn)生非法限制競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的結(jié)果。專利權(quán)人在專利權(quán)行使過(guò)程中，，如果違背了專利權(quán)創(chuàng)制的社會(huì)目的或精神，不正當(dāng)?shù)負(fù)p害了或可能損害他人利益或社會(huì)公共利益，就構(gòu)成專利權(quán)的濫用，當(dāng)這一濫用行為超越專利權(quán)對(duì)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)限制的合理界限構(gòu)成非法壟斷時(shí)，為平衡專利權(quán)、保護(hù)和維持自由競(jìng)爭(zhēng)，反壟斷法就有對(duì)此進(jìn)行規(guī)制的必要。 就專利聯(lián)盟反壟斷法律規(guī)制而言，我國(guó)《反壟斷法》的規(guī)定較為抽象、概括。而我國(guó)《合同法》、《對(duì)外貿(mào)易法》、《技術(shù)進(jìn)出口管理?xiàng)l例》雖就技術(shù)許可或轉(zhuǎn)讓中許可人實(shí)施的一些類型的限制性行為進(jìn)行了列舉性的規(guī)定，但一方面，這些法律法規(guī)自身存有缺陷，彼此之間也未能較好地協(xié)調(diào)。因而從整體上看，我國(guó)規(guī)制專利聯(lián)盟方面的反壟斷立法還不夠完善，不能很好適應(yīng)反壟斷法規(guī)制專利聯(lián)盟壟斷行為的需要。 而在專利聯(lián)盟反壟斷規(guī)制方面，美國(guó)和歐盟不僅有豐富的司法實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)和理論研究成果，還有較為完善的反壟斷立法。就反壟斷立法而言，在基本的反壟斷法之外，美國(guó)和歐盟反壟斷機(jī)構(gòu)還頒發(fā)了反壟斷法適用于專利權(quán)許可的指南或條例。實(shí)踐正面，這一立法模式較好地解決了抽象的反壟斷法如何適用于具體的專利聯(lián)盟許可問(wèn)題。鑒于我國(guó)目前反壟斷立法的不足，為更好地發(fā)揮反壟斷法對(duì)專利聯(lián)盟的規(guī)制，我國(guó)也應(yīng)借鑒美國(guó)和歐盟的立法模式，確定反壟斷審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，以保證我國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)市場(chǎng)上的自由競(jìng)爭(zhēng)秩序。
[Abstract]:Patent alliance is the response of the market to the phenomenon of "patent jungle", which has the positive significance of reducing the problem of superposition of license fees, reducing the risk and cost of tort litigation, and eliminating the obstruction of patent. However, it may also result in the illegal restriction of competition in the relevant market. If the patentee, in the course of the exercise of the patent right, violates the social purpose or spirit of the patent right creation, An abuse of a patent that unjustly damages or is likely to harm the interests of others or the public interest of society constitutes an abuse of the patent right, when such abuse exceeds the reasonable limits of the patent right and constitutes an illegal monopoly on the limits of competition, for the purpose of balancing the patent right, To protect and maintain free competition, anti-monopoly law is necessary to regulate it. As far as the antimonopoly law of patent alliance is concerned, the provisions of our country's Anti-monopoly Law are abstract. Generally speaking, China's contract Law, the Foreign Trade Law and the regulations on the Administration of the Import and Export of Technology provide for the enumeration of some types of restrictive acts carried out by licensees in the process of technology licensing or transfer, but on the one hand, These laws and regulations have their own defects, and they are not well coordinated with each other. Therefore, from the overall point of view, the anti-monopoly legislation in regulating patent alliances in China is not perfect enough. It can not meet the need of anti-monopoly law to regulate monopoly behavior of patent alliance. In the aspect of anti-monopoly regulation of patent alliance, the United States and the European Union not only have rich judicial practice experience and theoretical research results, but also have relatively perfect antitrust legislation. Antitrust agencies in the United States and the European Union have also issued guidelines or regulations that antitrust laws apply to patent licensing. This legislative model has solved the problem of how the abstract antimonopoly law can be applied to the licensing of patent alliance. In view of the deficiency of our country's current antimonopoly legislation, in order to bring the regulation of patent alliance into full play, China should also draw lessons from the legislative model of the United States and the European Union and determine the standards of antitrust examination in order to ensure the free competition order in our domestic market.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D912.29;D913

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 袁源;楊輝;宋偉;;專利池許可領(lǐng)域限制競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為的法律規(guī)制[J];科技與法律;2010年03期

2 詹映;;專利池反壟斷審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究[J];科技與法律;2011年01期

3 寧立志;;專利搭售許可的反壟斷法分析[J];上海交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期

4 詹映;朱雪忠;;標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和專利戰(zhàn)的主角——專利池解析[J];研究與發(fā)展管理;2007年01期

5 李玉劍,宣國(guó)良;專利聯(lián)盟反壟斷規(guī)制的比較研究[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2004年05期

6 王先林;潘志成;;反壟斷執(zhí)法與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)之間的平衡——美國(guó)《反托拉斯執(zhí)法與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán):促進(jìn)創(chuàng)新和競(jìng)爭(zhēng)》報(bào)告述評(píng)[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年06期

本文編號(hào)：1638294