本文選題：交通事故　切入點(diǎn)：損害賠償　出處：《大連海事大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：車輛掛靠經(jīng)營作為運(yùn)輸行業(yè)中的一種經(jīng)營模式在我國普遍存在,然而至今我國相關(guān)法律如《道路交通安全法》、《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》等仍沒有對車輛掛靠經(jīng)營的法律地位、被掛靠單位的義務(wù)、被掛靠單位在掛靠車輛發(fā)生交通事故損害賠償中的責(zé)任及承擔(dān)方式等問題進(jìn)行明確規(guī)定,各地出臺的針對處理掛靠經(jīng)營責(zé)任問題的規(guī)范性文件中所采取的歸責(zé)原則不一,法院對于實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的問題在判決時(shí)缺乏統(tǒng)一依據(jù),導(dǎo)致各地的判決也不盡相同。本文從現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中實(shí)際發(fā)生的案例出發(fā),對車輛掛靠經(jīng)營的特征,車輛掛靠經(jīng)營中涉及的法律關(guān)系,發(fā)生交通事故時(shí)責(zé)任的承擔(dān)主體,承擔(dān)責(zé)任原則等相關(guān)法律問題進(jìn)行了探討,最后提出被掛靠單位承擔(dān)的責(zé)任類型應(yīng)確定為“有限的補(bǔ)充賠償責(zé)任”,以期對實(shí)務(wù)中解決掛靠車輛發(fā)生交通事故損害賠償時(shí)被掛靠單位的責(zé)任承擔(dān)問題有所啟示。 本文的寫作分為以下幾個(gè)部分進(jìn)行： 一、從一起交通肇事案出發(fā),提出案件的爭議焦點(diǎn),引出本文主要探討的是在涉及車輛掛靠關(guān)系中,當(dāng)掛靠車輛發(fā)生交通事故損害賠償時(shí),被掛靠單位是否應(yīng)承擔(dān)責(zé)任及其承擔(dān)責(zé)任的方式是什么問題。 二、介紹車輛掛靠的含義、特征,分析掛靠人是掛靠車輛的實(shí)際所有人,被掛靠單位只是名義所有人,雙方之間的權(quán)利義務(wù)由車輛掛靠協(xié)議來約定；掛靠人與被掛靠單位之間是掛靠合同關(guān)系,掛靠人雇傭的人與被掛靠單位之間不存在雇傭勞動關(guān)系。 三、分析掛靠協(xié)議的法律效力,認(rèn)為法律并無明文規(guī)定禁止車輛掛靠經(jīng)營的行為,因此掛靠行為并不違反法律的規(guī)定,車輛掛靠協(xié)議只要是符合《合同法》的規(guī)定就應(yīng)該認(rèn)定是有效的。 四、分析現(xiàn)行立法中關(guān)于責(zé)任承擔(dān)主體的相關(guān)規(guī)定及“運(yùn)行支配及運(yùn)行利益”理論,認(rèn)為被掛靠單位應(yīng)成為交通事故賠償責(zé)任主體。 五、分析學(xué)界中關(guān)于掛靠車輛發(fā)生交通事故后被掛靠單位承擔(dān)連帶責(zé)任、有限連帶責(zé)任、墊付責(zé)任和補(bǔ)充責(zé)任的幾種學(xué)說,提出被掛靠單位應(yīng)承擔(dān)有限補(bǔ)充責(zé)任的觀點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:As a kind of management mode in the transportation industry, the vehicle link operation exists generally in our country. However, the relevant laws of our country, such as the Road Traffic Safety Law, the Tort liability Law, etc., still have no legal status on the vehicle link operation, so far, the related laws, such as the Road Traffic Safety Law, the Tort liability Law, etc. The obligations of the affiliated unit, the liability and the way to assume the liability of the affiliated unit in the compensation for traffic accident damage caused by the linked vehicle are clearly stipulated. The principles of imputation adopted in the normative documents issued by various localities to deal with the issue of related business liability are different, and the courts lack a unified basis for the problems that arise in practice when adjudicating. This article starts from the actual cases in real life, discusses the characteristics of the vehicle link management, the legal relationship involved in the vehicle link operation, the main body of responsibility in the event of traffic accident. Some related legal issues, such as the principle of liability, are discussed. Finally, the author puts forward that the type of liability should be defined as "limited supplementary liability", in order to solve the problem of liability bearing by the affiliated unit in practice in order to solve the problem of compensation for traffic accident damage caused by the linked vehicle. The writing of this paper is divided into the following parts:. First, starting from a traffic accident case, putting forward the dispute focus of the case, leading to the main discussion in this paper is that in the relation of vehicle connection, when the traffic accident damage compensation occurs on the link vehicle, What is the question of whether the affiliated unit should assume responsibility and how it should be held responsible. Second, introduce the meaning and characteristics of the vehicle link, analyze that the link person is the actual owner of the linked vehicle, the linked unit is only the nominal owner, and the rights and obligations between the two sides are agreed by the vehicle link agreement; The relationship between the affiliated persons and the affiliated units is the contract relationship, and there is no wage labor relationship between the persons employed by the affiliated persons and the affiliated units. Third, analyzing the legal effect of the link agreement, and holding that the law does not explicitly prohibit the operation of the vehicle link, therefore, the act of linking does not violate the provisions of the law. A vehicle alignment agreement shall be deemed valid as long as it complies with the provisions of the contract Law. Fourthly, it analyzes the relevant provisions of the current legislation on the subject of liability and the theory of "operation dominating and operating benefit", and thinks that the affiliated unit should become the subject of liability for traffic accident compensation. Fifthly, this paper analyzes several theories in academic circles about the joint liability, limited joint liability, advanced liability and supplementary liability of the linked unit after the traffic accident, and puts forward the view that the affiliated unit should bear the limited supplementary liability.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊立新;論侵權(quán)責(zé)任的補(bǔ)充責(zé)任[J];法律適用;2003年06期

2 劉成安;;試析掛靠車輛交通肇事?lián)p害賠償糾紛中被掛靠人的民事責(zé)任[J];法律適用;2006年08期

3 張鶴;;交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任主體的認(rèn)定[J];法制與社會;2008年07期

4 張銘宇;宋剛;;掛靠車輛肇事的法律責(zé)任問題[J];法制與社會;2010年22期

5 蔡高提;管滿泉;;試論交通肇事逃逸案的法律特征及偵防對策[J];公安學(xué)刊(浙江公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào));2007年01期

6 龔鵬飛;;交通事故責(zé)任與交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

7 劉星;李靜芹;;機(jī)動車道路交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任主體的認(rèn)定[J];河北法學(xué);2006年06期

8 歐麗云;試析道路交通肇事逃逸案件發(fā)生原因及對策[J];黑龍江交通科技;2002年02期

9 王勁松;陳永康;楊鵬飛;;公路客運(yùn)掛靠經(jīng)營剖析與治理[J];黑龍江交通科技;2007年07期

10 陳洪明;論交通肇事逃逸[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會發(fā)展;2005年08期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 陳立烽;[N];人民法院報(bào);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 戴玲;論貨運(yùn)掛靠車輛交通損害賠償中被掛靠單位的責(zé)任承擔(dān)方式[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

2 鄭先志;道路交通事故損害賠償法律問題研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2010年

3 蔡麗;機(jī)動車交通事故損害賠償歸責(zé)比較研究[D];對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2004年

4 徐振花;論機(jī)動車道路交通事故責(zé)任的歸責(zé)原則與責(zé)任主體[D];煙臺大學(xué);2007年

5 趙會;論公路貨運(yùn)交通事故被掛靠單位風(fēng)險(xiǎn)責(zé)任[D];蘭州大學(xué);2009年

6 周榮康;道路運(yùn)輸掛靠車管理對策研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1636454