本文選題：商業(yè)秘密　切入點(diǎn)：侵犯商業(yè)秘密罪　出處：《黑龍江大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：商業(yè)秘密作為一種能為權(quán)利人帶來經(jīng)濟(jì)利益和競爭優(yōu)勢的無形財(cái)產(chǎn)，其重要性日益明顯，侵犯商業(yè)秘密的行為已經(jīng)蔓延到經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)的各個(gè)方面，同時(shí)不僅是對(duì)相關(guān)權(quán)利人的侵害，也是對(duì)國家經(jīng)濟(jì)安全的威脅。因此,刑事保護(hù)商業(yè)秘密已經(jīng)成為一種必要手段。美國和中國分別于1996年和1997年通過刑事立法將侵犯商業(yè)秘密的行為進(jìn)行犯罪化,也說明中美兩國在對(duì)商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)上的相同的價(jià)值判斷。本文通過力拓侵犯商業(yè)秘密罪案和鐘東凡經(jīng)濟(jì)間諜罪案的對(duì)比作為出發(fā)點(diǎn)，結(jié)合中美侵犯商業(yè)秘密罪的立法比較，提出完善我國商業(yè)秘密刑事保護(hù)的一些建議。 文章共分為三個(gè)部分，第一部分是對(duì)兩個(gè)典型案例事實(shí)的介紹，簡要闡述有關(guān)侵犯商業(yè)秘密所引發(fā)的問題，為下文的論述做鋪墊。第二部分從我國和美國保護(hù)商業(yè)秘密的刑事立法角度，結(jié)合案例引發(fā)的問題，分別從以下方面進(jìn)行論述：首先，從商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)的理論出發(fā)，由合同法理論到侵權(quán)法理論最終上升到財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)理論，奠定了商業(yè)秘密刑事保護(hù)的基礎(chǔ)；其次，對(duì)商業(yè)秘密的特征進(jìn)行比較，，我國與美國商業(yè)秘密的主要區(qū)別在于對(duì)實(shí)用性的有無的規(guī)定上；再次，對(duì)本罪的入罪標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行分析，美國采用的是定性入罪模式，而我國是采用既定量又定性的入罪模式。最后，在罪名設(shè)置和罪刑配置上進(jìn)行比較研究，從而看出我國侵犯商業(yè)秘密罪的立法現(xiàn)狀與美國的差距。第三部分結(jié)合案例和上述的關(guān)于兩國在商業(yè)秘密刑事保護(hù)中存在的差異，提出完善我國商業(yè)秘密的刑事保護(hù)建議。主要從商業(yè)秘密的特征、“重大損失”認(rèn)定的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)上、罪名的設(shè)置和刑罰的配置上提出完善的建議。
[Abstract]:As a kind of intangible property which can bring economic benefits and competitive advantages to the obligee, the importance of trade secret is becoming more and more obvious, and the infringement of trade secret has spread to all aspects of economic activities. At the same time, it is not only an infringement on the relevant right holders, but also a threat to the national economic security. Criminal protection of trade secrets has become a necessary means. The United States and China passed criminal legislation on 1996 and 1997 respectively to criminalize violations of trade secrets. It also shows that China and the United States have the same value judgment on the protection of trade secrets. Through the comparison between Rio Tinto's crime of infringing trade secrets and Zhong Dongfan's crime of economic espionage, this paper combines the legislative comparison between China and the United States on the crime of infringing on trade secrets. Some suggestions are put forward to improve the criminal protection of trade secrets in China. The article is divided into three parts. The first part introduces the facts of two typical cases and briefly expounds the problems caused by the violation of trade secrets. In the second part, from the angle of criminal legislation of protecting trade secret in our country and the United States, combined with the problems caused by the case, respectively, the following aspects are discussed: first, from the theory of trade secret protection, From the theory of contract law to the theory of tort law, it finally rises to the theory of property right, which lays the foundation for the criminal protection of trade secret. Secondly, the characteristics of trade secret are compared. The main difference between our country and the United States lies in the practical provisions. Thirdly, after analyzing the standard of this crime, the United States adopts the mode of qualitative incrimination. In our country, both quantitative and qualitative patterns of incrimination are adopted. Finally, a comparative study is carried out on the establishment of charges and the allocation of crime and punishment. The third part combines the case and the above differences between the two countries in the criminal protection of trade secrets. The author puts forward some suggestions to improve the criminal protection of trade secrets in China, mainly from the aspects of the characteristics of trade secrets, the criteria for the determination of "heavy losses", the setting of charges and the allocation of penalties.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 戴蓬;;論侵犯商業(yè)秘密案件中損失數(shù)額的認(rèn)定[J];福建警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

2 劉妙香,白恒晶;美國《經(jīng)濟(jì)間諜法》對(duì)商業(yè)秘密的超強(qiáng)度保護(hù)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2002年04期

3 李群英;由一起侵犯商業(yè)秘密案引發(fā)的法律思考[J];法學(xué)雜志;2002年04期

4 陳興良;;侵犯商業(yè)秘密罪的重大損失及數(shù)額認(rèn)定[J];法律適用;2011年07期

5 孫利;;對(duì)肖日明侵犯商業(yè)秘密一案的法律分析[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(公安法治研究);2006年05期

6 趙秉志;劉志偉;劉科;;關(guān)于侵犯商業(yè)秘密罪立法完善的研討[J];人民檢察;2010年04期

7 譚瑞;;對(duì)侵犯商業(yè)秘密罪刑罰配置的理性思考[J];四川警官高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

8 左亞楠;;侵犯商業(yè)秘密罪中“重大損失”的認(rèn)定[J];商品與質(zhì)量;2011年S9期

9 陳龍鑫;;侵犯商業(yè)秘密犯罪現(xiàn)狀與立法完善——以力拓案為切入點(diǎn)[J];犯罪研究;2009年05期

10 王俊民;李飛;趙寧;;侵犯商業(yè)秘密罪若干問題三人談[J];中國刑事法雜志;2005年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 本報(bào)記者 張龍;[N];中國企業(yè)報(bào);2010年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 趙天紅;商業(yè)秘密的刑事保護(hù)研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2006年

本文編號(hào)：1601724