本文選題：關(guān)聯(lián)交易合同　切入點：效力要件　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：關(guān)聯(lián)交易及其合同本質(zhì)上屬于中性概念，公平的關(guān)聯(lián)交易對商業(yè)活動的效率理念有促進作用，，因而應(yīng)予提倡。但不公平的關(guān)聯(lián)交易則會由于關(guān)聯(lián)關(guān)系人對公司一方當(dāng)事人意志上的控制，易對公司整體利益、公司中小股東及債權(quán)人的利益造成損害。本文著重對關(guān)聯(lián)交易合同的效力要件、效力狀態(tài)及其法律規(guī)制問題進行了探討，以尋求更好的規(guī)制關(guān)聯(lián)交易合同的途徑。 文章的第一部分對本文的研究對象進行了界定。通過對關(guān)聯(lián)交易相關(guān)概念的分析，將要研究的關(guān)聯(lián)交易合同所涉及的關(guān)聯(lián)交易類型鎖定為基本自我交易。之后探討關(guān)聯(lián)交易合同在成立要件上的特殊性，以及對民商法傳統(tǒng)理論構(gòu)成的挑戰(zhàn)。 文章第二部分闡述了關(guān)聯(lián)交易合同效力判定的相關(guān)問題。本部分對關(guān)聯(lián)交易合同的效力要件以及不公平關(guān)聯(lián)交易合同的效力狀態(tài)進行研究。關(guān)聯(lián)交易合同的效力要件問題我國法律中基本沒有作何規(guī)定，筆者主要從合同的一般效力要件以及國外立法例的研究中總結(jié)關(guān)聯(lián)交易合同效力要件的構(gòu)成及各要件的具體內(nèi)容。隨后通過對合同多種效力狀態(tài)的分析闡釋關(guān)聯(lián)交易合同可撤銷性的合理性，并討論了可撤銷性在合同法上的理論基礎(chǔ)。 文章第三部分揭示了我國合同法、公司法在關(guān)聯(lián)交易合同效力規(guī)則規(guī)范方面的不足。我國合同法中沒有將關(guān)聯(lián)交易合同納入調(diào)整范圍，公司法中對關(guān)聯(lián)交易合同效力規(guī)則也沒有具體的規(guī)定，致使關(guān)聯(lián)交易合同在我國法律中適用無門，關(guān)聯(lián)交易合同利益相關(guān)人的權(quán)益難以得到保障。 文章第四部分內(nèi)容針對上文探討的我國法律在關(guān)聯(lián)交易合同效力規(guī)則上的立法現(xiàn)狀提出了自己的完善意見。筆者認為關(guān)聯(lián)交易合同的效力問題屬于合同法與公司法交叉領(lǐng)域的問題，對這一問題的重構(gòu)與完善需從合同法和公司法的角度全面入手。因而本文就合同法中關(guān)聯(lián)交易合同撤銷規(guī)則的設(shè)立提出了建議，同時在公司法的披露制度、表決權(quán)排除制度等方面的完善也表達了個人意見。
[Abstract]:The related party transaction and its contract belong to the neutral concept essentially, the fair related party transaction has the promotion function to the commercial activity efficiency idea, Therefore, it should be advocated. However, unfair related party transactions will easily benefit the company as a whole because of the control of the party concerned in the company. The interests of the minority shareholders and creditors of the company are damaged. This paper focuses on the effective elements, the effective state and the legal regulation of the related party transaction contract, in order to seek a better way to regulate the related party transaction contract. The first part of the article defines the research object of this paper. The related party transaction type that will be studied in the related party transaction contract is locked in the basic self-transaction. Then the particularity of the related party transaction contract in the essential elements and the challenge to the traditional theory of civil and commercial law are discussed. In the second part of the article, the author expounds the related problems of the validity judgment of the related party transaction contract. This part studies the effective elements of the related party transaction contract and the validity state of the unfair related party transaction contract. The effect of the related party transaction contract. There is basically no provision in the law of our country on the requirements of force. The author summarizes the constitution and the concrete content of the related party transaction contract from the general effective elements of contract and the research of foreign legislation cases. Then, through the analysis of various effective states of the contract, the author explains the relevance. The reasonableness of the revocability of the transaction contract, The theoretical basis of revocability in contract law is also discussed. The third part of the article reveals the deficiency of the contract law of our country, the company law in the regulation of the validity rules of the related party transaction contract, which does not bring the related party transaction contract into the adjustment scope in the contract law of our country. There is no specific regulation on the validity rules of the related party transaction contract in the company law, which leads to the application of the related party transaction contract in the law of our country without a door, and the rights and interests of the related party in the related party transaction contract are difficult to be protected. In the 4th part of the article, the author puts forward his own opinions on the legislative status quo of the validity rules of the related party transaction contracts discussed above. The author thinks that the validity of the related party transaction contracts belongs to the contract law and the public. Issues in the cross-cutting area of justice, The reconstruction and perfection of this problem should be carried out from the angle of contract law and company law. Therefore, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the establishment of contract revocation rules in contract law, and at the same time puts forward some suggestions in the disclosure system of company law. The perfection of the system of exclusion of voting rights also expresses personal opinions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 董安生;陳潔;;不公平關(guān)聯(lián)交易合同的可撤銷性問題研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年02期

2 董安生;張保華;;缺失的合同效力規(guī)則——論關(guān)聯(lián)交易對傳統(tǒng)民法的挑戰(zhàn)[J];法學(xué)家;2007年03期

3 施天濤;杜晶;;我國公司法上關(guān)聯(lián)交易的皈依及其法律規(guī)制——一個利益沖突交易法則的中國版本[J];中國法學(xué);2007年06期

本文編號：1590020