本文選題：旅游合同　切入點：旅游合同性質(zhì)　出處：《上海社會科學院》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：伴隨著國內(nèi)旅游行業(yè)的迅猛發(fā)展,各式各樣旅游合同糾紛也逐漸增多,但相較于我國世界第三的旅游大國地位,國內(nèi)關(guān)于旅游方面的法治發(fā)展卻不盡如人意。目前,2010年最高人民法院審判委員會通過的《關(guān)于審理旅游糾紛案件適用法律若干問題的規(guī)定》,是現(xiàn)階段最具有權(quán)威性的司法解釋。此外,《旅行社條例》、《旅行社服務(wù)質(zhì)量賠償標準》等,是我國現(xiàn)有的關(guān)于旅游方面較為完備的法規(guī)。綜上所述,我國現(xiàn)階段尚無旅游方面的專項立法,司法實踐中在處理旅游合同糾紛時,多參照現(xiàn)行《中華人民共和國民法通則》及《中華人民共和國合同法》的相關(guān)規(guī)定處理,缺少統(tǒng)一的標準。很明顯國內(nèi)在旅游立法方面的發(fā)展遠遠不及旅游行業(yè)前進之速度,這就自然而然的要求我們給予旅游合同相關(guān)問題更多的關(guān)注,本文通過對美國、英國、德國、日本及我國臺灣地區(qū)旅游立法現(xiàn)狀及司法實踐的介紹,結(jié)合我國理論、立法及司法實務(wù)的現(xiàn)實情況,重點對旅游合同概念、旅游合同特征、旅游合同法律關(guān)系性質(zhì)、旅游合同法律責任及旅游合同違約精神損害賠償?shù)确矫鎲栴}進行探討。 本文除引言和結(jié)束語外,共分為三個部分： 第一章是旅游合同法律關(guān)系性質(zhì),共分三節(jié)。第一節(jié)是旅游及旅游合同的概念,通過介紹世界其他國家或地區(qū),關(guān)于旅游及旅游合同的各種觀點,析出筆者對旅游合同的定義；第二節(jié)是旅游合同的特征,主要從旅游合同應(yīng)具備的一般合同特征和專有特征兩方面進行討論；第三節(jié)是旅游合同法律關(guān)系性質(zhì),提出了委托合同說、承攬合同說、行紀合同說、居間合同說及混合合同說等五種主要的旅游合同性質(zhì)說,且分別與旅游合同進行對比分析,闡述筆者對于旅游合同法律關(guān)系性質(zhì)的認識。 第二章是旅游合同法律責任,共分三節(jié)。第一節(jié)是旅游合同締約過失責任,主要討論了滿足旅游合同締約過失責任的條件、可能造成承擔締約過失的情形及締約過失賠償范圍的界定；第二節(jié)是旅游合同侵權(quán)責任,通過結(jié)合司法實例,主要論述了旅游經(jīng)營者、旅游輔助者及第三人等三類主體的侵權(quán)責任；第三節(jié)是旅游合同違約責任,本節(jié)是第二章論述的重點,與司法實務(wù)相結(jié)合,重點闡述了旅游合同違約責任的特征、構(gòu)成要件、免責事由、承擔責任的方式以及旅游合同違約責任與締約過失責任和侵權(quán)責任的區(qū)別。 第三章是旅游合同違約責任的非財產(chǎn)損害賠償,共分三節(jié)。第一節(jié)是旅游合同違約責任中非財產(chǎn)損害賠償?shù)目尚行院捅匾裕坏诙?jié)是旅游合同時間浪費之損害賠償,通過介紹國內(nèi)外立法及司法實踐,主要討論了時間浪費的認定和時間浪費的賠償標準方面問題；第三節(jié)是旅游合同違約精神損害賠償,通過對比世界各國或地區(qū)關(guān)于旅游合同精神損害賠償立法現(xiàn)狀及司法實踐,闡述我國構(gòu)建旅游合同違約責任非財產(chǎn)損害賠償?shù)脑撛撘獾膯栴}。 鑒于旅游合同自身的特殊性,其很難參照我國現(xiàn)有合同理論解決有關(guān)問題,故而旅游合同立法勢在必行。本文中,筆者對上述所涉及問題,進行了一些嘗試性的探討,在個別問題上闡述了自己的觀點,以期為旅游合同法律制度的構(gòu)建略盡綿薄之力。
[Abstract]:Along with the rapid development of domestic tourism industry, every kind of tourism contract dispute also gradually increased, but compared to China's third world tourism power, domestic law on tourism development is not satisfactory. At present, in 2010 the Supreme People's Court of the judicial committee of the "some issues concerning the application of law provisions on the trial of tourist dispute cases. At the present stage is the judicial interpretation of the most authoritative travel regulations. In addition, < >, < > travel service quality standard of compensation, is China's existing on tourism comprehensive regulations. To sum up, the special legislation of our country at this stage there is no tourism, in the judicial practice in dealing with disputes the travel contract, the relevant provisions of the general principles of the civil law of People's Republic of China refer to < > and < > the People's Republic of China contract law, the lack of uniform standards. Obviously our inner journey The development of tourism legislation is far less than the speed of the tourism industry forward, which naturally requires us to give more attention to issues related to the travel contract, according to the United States, Britain, Germany, Japan and Taiwan of China tourism legislation and judicial practice are introduced, combined with China's reality of theory, legislation and judicial practice the key concept of tourism contract, characteristics of travel contract, tourism contract legal relationship nature, questions of compensation for travel contract legal responsibility and moral damage in breach of travel contract are discussed.
Apart from the introduction and the concluding remarks, this article is divided into three parts:
The first chapter is the legal relationship between the travel contract, is divided into three sections. The first section is the concept of tourism and tourism contract, through the introduction of other countries or regions of the world, various views on tourism and tourism contract, the precipitation of the travel contract is defined; the second section is the features of tourism contract, to discuss the two aspects of the general characteristics of the contract and proprietary features mainly from the travel contract should have; the third section is the legal relationship between the travel contract, the contract, work contract, contract of commission, brokerage contract and mixed contract and other five kinds of travel contract should be said, and the travel contract carries on the contrast analysis, elaborated the author to understanding the nature of the legal relationship of tourism contract.
The second chapter is the legal responsibility of the travel contract, is divided into three sections. The first section is the travel contract liability, mainly discusses the tourism contract meet the liability for contracting negligence may cause the condition, scope of compensation and Culpa in contract negligence; the second section is the travel contract tort liability, by combining judicial examples, mainly the tour operators, tourism auxiliary tort liability and three people in three main categories; the third section is the liability for breach of tourism contract, this section is the focus of the second chapter, combined with judicial practice, focusing on the features of tourism contract breach liability elements, exemption, difference and liability for breach of contract contracting negligence liability and tort liability of liability and the travel contract.
The third chapter is the non property damage compensation for breach of contract, is divided into three sections. The first section is the liability for breach of tourism contract in non property damage compensation of the necessity and feasibility; damage to the second day is the time wasted travel contract compensation, through the introduction of domestic and foreign legislation and judicial practice, mainly discusses the identification and waste of time waste compensation standard; the third section is the tourism spirit of breach of contract damages, compared with other countries and regions in the world about the travel contract damages the spirit of legislation and judicial practice, the meaning of the problem on China's construction of breach of contract compensation for non pecuniary damage.
In view of the special nature of the tourism contract itself, it is difficult to refer to our country existing contract theory to solve the problem, so the travel contract legislation is imperative. In this paper, the author of the issues involved, made some tentative study on individual issues on their views, in order to build the legal system of tourism contract Mianbaozhili.

【學位授予單位】：上海社會科學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宋進舉;試論旅游合同違約之精神損害賠償[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2003年01期

2 鄧世新;;第三人侵權(quán)情況下經(jīng)營者安全保障義務(wù):由案件生發(fā)[J];重慶社會科學;2011年02期

3 李寶軍;非財產(chǎn)損害賠償與締約過失責任[J];當代法學;2003年03期

4 俞宏雷;芻議旅游合同糾紛案件的審理[J];法律適用(國家法官學院學報);2001年03期

5 張嵩,宋會勇;試論旅游合同立法[J];法學;1998年04期

6 ;孟元訴中佳旅行社旅游合同糾紛案[J];中華人民共和國最高人民法院公報;2005年02期

7 黃瀚瑤;;我國旅游合同違約責任中的精神損害賠償探微[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬刊);2008年11期

8 李爽;;有關(guān)締約過失責任賠償范圍的思考[J];法制與社會;2012年11期

9 胡苷用;;違約非財產(chǎn)損害賠償論——以旅游合同為切入點[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2007年11期

10 夏月星;旅游合同中的非財產(chǎn)損害賠償責任——從“死神陪伴的旅行”終審判決談起[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學院學報;2002年02期

，

本文編號：1585912