本文選題：安全保障義務(wù)　切入點(diǎn)：合同附隨義務(wù)　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著我國經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)的發(fā)展，在司法實(shí)踐中違反安全保障義務(wù)侵權(quán)案件不斷增多，我國立法中有關(guān)“安全保障義務(wù)”這一概念最早出現(xiàn)在最高人民法院2003年12月頒布施行的《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理人身損害賠償案件適用法律若干問題的解釋》第6條中，2009年12月人大常委會(huì)頒布施行的《中華人民共和國侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第37條就違反該義務(wù)的侵權(quán)責(zé)任做出了相應(yīng)規(guī)定。世界各國或地區(qū)的法律體系中，都存在類似的制度設(shè)計(jì)，，在對(duì)相關(guān)制度的比較研究基礎(chǔ)上，本文對(duì)我國侵權(quán)法上的安全保障義務(wù)制度提出了一些改善建議。 本文除引言之外，共分為四部分，第一部分研究了安全保障義務(wù)從合同法領(lǐng)域向侵權(quán)法領(lǐng)域的轉(zhuǎn)變：隨著合同責(zé)任的擴(kuò)張，合同責(zé)任領(lǐng)域與侵權(quán)責(zé)任領(lǐng)域出現(xiàn)了融合；合同法上的安全保障義務(wù)是伴隨著合同附隨義務(wù)保護(hù)功能重要性的提升發(fā)展而來的，隨著社會(huì)危險(xiǎn)領(lǐng)域的增大以及危險(xiǎn)程度的提升，為了更好地保護(hù)人們所享有的人身及財(cái)產(chǎn)等權(quán)益，安全保障義務(wù)不斷地向侵權(quán)法領(lǐng)域轉(zhuǎn)變；該部分最后對(duì)侵權(quán)法上安全保障義務(wù)理論的形成與發(fā)展進(jìn)行了闡述，分析了刑法上過失理論、注意義務(wù)理論、不作為侵權(quán)責(zé)任等理論對(duì)其形成與發(fā)展的影響。第二部分析了安全保障義務(wù)的法理依據(jù)，侵權(quán)法通過過錯(cuò)侵權(quán)責(zé)任與無過錯(cuò)侵權(quán)責(zé)任實(shí)現(xiàn)了利益平衡的功能，協(xié)調(diào)了自由正義與法律秩序的價(jià)值目標(biāo)，安全保障義務(wù)的創(chuàng)制正是為了更好地實(shí)現(xiàn)侵權(quán)法這一功能與價(jià)值目標(biāo)，該部分接著闡述了安全保障義務(wù)的法理依據(jù)。第三部分從比較法的角度對(duì)侵權(quán)法上的安全保障義務(wù)制度進(jìn)行了研究，對(duì)大陸法系和英美法系主要國家和地區(qū)的相關(guān)制度進(jìn)行了探討，最后在比較法研究的基礎(chǔ)上闡述了侵權(quán)法上安全保障義務(wù)的含義及特征。第四部分對(duì)我國安全保障義務(wù)制度進(jìn)行了探討，分析了其發(fā)展歷史及侵權(quán)責(zé)任的構(gòu)成，并在上述理論研究的基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)我國相關(guān)立法提出了完善建議。
[Abstract]:As China's economic and social development, in the judicial practice in violation of security obligation of tort cases increasing, the legislation of our country about the concept of "security obligations" first appeared in the Supreme People's Court promulgated in December 2003, the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the implementation of the "Application of law for the trial of personal injury compensation case explanation > sixth in the tort liability, tort liability law of < People's Republic of China > thirty-seventh of December 2009 NPC Standing Committee promulgated the breach of this duty to make corresponding provisions. The legal system of other countries and regions in the world, there are similar in system design, the related system on the basis of comparative study, this paper puts forward some improvement suggestions to our country safeguard obligation in tort law system.
In addition to the introduction this paper is divided into four parts, the first part of the study of security obligations from contract law to tort law: with the expansion of the field of contract liability, tort liability and contract liability appeared in the field of fusion; contract law on the obligation of security is accompanied by the contract along with the development of compulsory protection the function of importance, with the increase of social hazardous areas and enhance the degree of risk in order to better protect the people enjoy the personal and property rights, security obligations to the field of tort law; the last part expatiates on the safety guarantee of the formation and development of the obligation theory of tort law, analysis the theory of criminal negligence, the duty of care theory, the tort theory influence on the forming and development of it. The second part analyzes the legal obligation of security in accordance with the According to the tort law, the tort liability and no fault liability to achieve the balance of interests of the function and value goal of coordinated freedom and justice and legal order, security obligation is created in order to better achieve the function of tort law and the value goal, then this part describes the legal basis. The third part is the research on the safeguard obligation in tort law system from the perspective of comparative law, the related system of civil law and common law countries and regions are discussed. Finally, based on the study of comparative law on tort law describes the security obligations of the meaning and characteristics. The fourth part discusses the obligation of security, which analyzes the history and development of tort liability, and on the basis of the theoretical research on the relevant legislation in China put forward the improvement suggestions.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 陳現(xiàn)杰;《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理人身損害賠償案件適用法律若干問題的解釋》的若干理論與實(shí)務(wù)問題解析[J];法律適用;2004年02期

2 劉士國;安全關(guān)照義務(wù)論[J];法學(xué)研究;1999年05期

3 宮本健藏;金春龍;于敏;韓世遠(yuǎn);;日本的安全照顧義務(wù)論的形成與展開[J];清華法學(xué);2004年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 熊進(jìn)光;侵權(quán)行為法上的安全注意義務(wù)研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年

2 楊垠紅;侵權(quán)法上安全保障義務(wù)之研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2006年

本文編號(hào)：1556751