本文關(guān)鍵詞： 不動(dòng)產(chǎn) 風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān) 所有權(quán)主義 物權(quán)變動(dòng)　出處：《南京大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)問題是合同法中的重要問題。然學(xué)術(shù)界關(guān)于“風(fēng)險(xiǎn)”問題的討論幾乎都集中在動(dòng)產(chǎn)領(lǐng)域,在不動(dòng)產(chǎn)領(lǐng)域卻很少提及,以致于汶川地震后,實(shí)踐中都找不到可適用的法條來拯救現(xiàn)實(shí)中復(fù)雜的房屋毀損滅失。本文試圖通過剖析風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)基本理論,探討房屋買賣中公平合理的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)適用規(guī)則,并對實(shí)務(wù)中的部分疑難問題和我國現(xiàn)行法的相關(guān)規(guī)定提出了一些見解。全文共分為五部分： 第一部分界定了風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)的內(nèi)涵。首先從性質(zhì)和內(nèi)容兩方面簡單介紹了風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的內(nèi)涵；然后界定了風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)的含義并對風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)制度與其他相關(guān)制度進(jìn)行了區(qū)分。 第二部分論述了買賣雙方均未違約時(shí)的房屋買賣風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)。首先,詳細(xì)介紹了合同成立主義、所有權(quán)主義、交付主義、債權(quán)人主義、債務(wù)人主義這五種風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)理論；然后,仔細(xì)分析了世界各國有關(guān)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)問題的立法規(guī)定,探討出世界各國實(shí)質(zhì)上采納的仍是所有權(quán)主義風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)規(guī)則；接著,對所有權(quán)主義風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)規(guī)則的合理性及其在雙方未違約時(shí)(即一般情形下)房屋買賣中的適用性進(jìn)行了討論。 第三部分論述了違約時(shí)的房屋買賣風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)。首先,從出賣人和買受人的義務(wù)出發(fā),界定了房屋買賣中出賣人和買受人各自的違約情形,然后對所有權(quán)主義風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)規(guī)則是否適用于解決出賣人違約和買受人違約時(shí)的房屋買賣風(fēng)險(xiǎn)問題分別展開了討論。 第四部分論述了其他情形下的房屋買賣風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)。在這一章,筆者主要分析探討先登記后轉(zhuǎn)移、多重買賣和買賣出租中的房屋這三種情形下的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)問題。 第五部分評析了我國風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)相關(guān)立法并提出了可行的建議。主要是針對我國《合同法》、《合同法解釋三》和《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理商品房買賣合同糾紛案件適用法律若干問題的解釋》中的相關(guān)規(guī)定進(jìn)行了分析和討論,指出其不足,并提出了可行的修正建議。
[Abstract]:The issue of risk burden is an important issue in contract law. However, the discussion of "risk" in academic circles is almost concentrated in the field of movable property, but rarely mentioned in the field of real estate, so that after the Wenchuan earthquake, In practice, no applicable law can be found to save the complicated house damage and loss in reality. This paper attempts to analyze the basic theory of risk burden and discuss the applicable rules of fair and reasonable risk burden in house sale and purchase. And put forward some opinions on some difficult problems in practice and the relevant provisions of the current law of our country. The full text is divided into five parts altogether:. The first part defines the connotation of risk and risk burden. Firstly, it introduces the connotation of risk from two aspects of nature and content, and then defines the meaning of risk burden and distinguishes the system of risk burden from other related systems. The second part discusses the risk burden of house sale and purchase when neither buyer nor seller has defaulted. Firstly, it introduces the five kinds of risk burden theories, such as contract formation, ownership, delivery, creditor and debtor. After a careful analysis of the legislative provisions on the issue of risk burden in various countries of the world, it is discussed that the rules of risk burden of ownership are still adopted by the countries of the world in essence; then, This paper discusses the rationality of the risk burden rule of ownership doctrine and its applicability in the case of non-breach of contract (i.e. in general case). The third part discusses the risk burden of house sale and purchase. First of all, from the obligations of seller and buyer, it defines the breach of contract between seller and buyer. Then it discusses whether the risk burden rules of ownership doctrine can solve the problem of the seller's default and the buyer's default. In this chapter, the author mainly analyzes the risk problems under the three situations of registration and transfer, multiple buying and selling and buying and selling houses. Part 5th analyzes the relevant legislation of risk burden in our country and puts forward some feasible suggestions. It is mainly aimed at the cases of contract law, interpretation of contract law and the Supreme people's Court of China concerning the trial of contract disputes on the sale and purchase of commercial housing. The relevant provisions in the interpretation of several questions of the applicable law are analysed and discussed. The deficiency is pointed out, and some feasible suggestions are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 劉廷華;;買賣合同風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)規(guī)則研究——兼評《商品房買賣合同解釋》第11條[J];中國石油大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年01期

，

本文編號：1495567