國際域名爭議解決機制的利益平衡研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-06-14 18:15
【摘要】：國際域名爭議的解決是重要的網(wǎng)絡(luò)法律問題,也是法學(xué)研究的前沿性熱點問題。本文以“利益平衡理論”為基礎(chǔ),對爭議解決機制進行系統(tǒng)的利益平衡考量,提出作者自己的觀點。全文由引言、正文五章和結(jié)語組成。 引言部分說明了選題的背景及價值、國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀以及文章所采用的研究方法。 第一章全面闡述利益平衡理論。法律是協(xié)助人們實現(xiàn)特定目的的手段或工具。利益是法律的產(chǎn)生之源,法律的根本目的不僅僅是維護利益,進一步說應(yīng)該是維護以統(tǒng)治集團根本利益為基礎(chǔ)的利益平衡。法律通過設(shè)定權(quán)利義務(wù)以及在立法、司法等各方面運用利益平衡方法來實現(xiàn)自身的目的。利益平衡理論為下文的研究提供理論基礎(chǔ)。 第二章明確提出國際域名爭議解決機制中利益平衡的基本問題。國際域名爭議解決機制利益平衡的基本目標應(yīng)當(dāng)是通過爭議的解決促進網(wǎng)絡(luò)健康發(fā)展。所涉利益類型包括國家利益、社會公共利益和當(dāng)事人個人利益,利益平衡類型主要包括域名權(quán)益人與傳統(tǒng)權(quán)利人之間的利益平衡以及爭議所涉國家之間的利益平衡。利益平衡的基本要求包括權(quán)利與義務(wù)的平衡以及公平與效率的平衡。 第三章深入探討國際域名爭議案件司法管轄中的利益平衡。獨立管轄體制理論,包括網(wǎng)絡(luò)自治論、管轄權(quán)相對論和第四國際空間論,無法符合利益平衡要求,不會得到任何國家的接受。各國都是通過發(fā)展傳統(tǒng)管轄理論和依據(jù)來應(yīng)對國際域名爭議案件的管轄問題。美國“最低聯(lián)系”管轄理論能夠較好地平衡各種利益關(guān)系,值得肯定。我國在傳統(tǒng)侵權(quán)行為地管轄依據(jù)基礎(chǔ)上形成了“設(shè)備所在地”管轄模式,“被告侵權(quán)設(shè)備所在地”應(yīng)作為主要管轄依據(jù),“原告發(fā)現(xiàn)侵權(quán)信息的計算機終端等設(shè)備所在地”可作為侵權(quán)行為實施地難以確定時的輔助管轄依據(jù)。另外,“原告就被告”原則總體上能夠適應(yīng)實踐要求,應(yīng)當(dāng)堅持。這些管轄依據(jù)和原則符合我國實際情況,可以比較有效地平衡當(dāng)事人利益,也有利于我國法院司法資源的有效利用。 第四章系統(tǒng)研究國際域名爭議案件實體法中的利益平衡。文章將國際域名與商標爭議分為域名搶注、域名盜用和權(quán)利沖突三種,對美國和我國的國內(nèi)實體法律規(guī)則及其適用進行利益平衡分析,并對域名與非商標標識爭議的實體規(guī)則及其適用進行論述。 第五章詳細論述國際域名爭議專家裁決機制中的利益平衡。ICANN機制在程序方面能滿足利益平衡要求,實現(xiàn)程序的高效和公正；在實體方面則過于側(cè)重保護商標權(quán),對域名權(quán)益人的利益保護不力。該狀況是時代環(huán)境、認識局限和特定利益代表等多種原因作用的結(jié)果。要加強對域名權(quán)益人利益的保護,就要完善“反向域名侵奪”規(guī)則。在時機成熟時可增加“投訴人為域名權(quán)益人”的侵犯域名權(quán)的投訴類型。我國的專家裁決機制與ICANN機制十分相似,對域名權(quán)益人的保護也不力,所以應(yīng)加強這方面的機制建設(shè),實現(xiàn)當(dāng)事人利益的真正平衡。 結(jié)語部分總括全文內(nèi)容并再一次鮮明提出本文的中心論點：利益平衡理論應(yīng)作為國際域名爭議解決機制建設(shè)和實踐的重要理論基礎(chǔ)。從總體上看,現(xiàn)有爭議解決機制在程序方面較好地體現(xiàn)了利益平衡理念,但在實體方面明顯偏重對傳統(tǒng)權(quán)利人的利益保護,未能真正維護當(dāng)事人之間的利益平衡。所以,從長遠來看,需要在利益平衡理論指導(dǎo)下在實體方面加以完善。
[Abstract]:The solution of the dispute of the international domain name is an important legal problem of the network, and it is also a hot issue of the leading edge of the legal research. Based on the "balance of interest theory", this paper puts forward the author's own views on the balance of the system of the dispute settlement mechanism. The full text consists of the introduction, the body of the text and the conclusion. The introduction section explains the background and value of the topic, the current research situation at home and abroad, and the study party adopted by the article. Law. Chapter I fully sets out the benefit level The theory of scale. The law is a means of assisting people to achieve a specific purpose. Or a tool. The benefit is the source of the law. The fundamental purpose of the law is not only for the maintenance of interests, but also for the maintenance of the benefit of the fundamental interests of the ruling group. The law is to realize self-balance by setting the rights and obligations and using the balance of interests in the aspects of legislation and the administration of justice. The purpose of the study is to provide a basis for the following research. On the basis of the second chapter, the interest balance in the dispute settlement mechanism of the international domain name is put forward in the second chapter The basic objective of the interests balance of the international domain name dispute settlement mechanism should be to promote the network through the dispute resolution The types of interests involved include national interests, social public interests and the personal interests of the parties. The type of interest balance mainly includes the balance between the interests of the domain name and the traditional rights and the state of the dispute The balance of interests and the balance of interests, including the balance of rights and obligations, and equity and The third chapter probes into the jurisdiction of the international domain name dispute case. The balance of interests under the jurisdiction. Independent jurisdiction system theory, including the theory of network self-government, the theory of jurisdiction relativity and the fourth international space theory, cannot meet the requirements of interest balance and will not be obtained The acceptance of any country. Each country is to deal with the international domain name dispute through the development of the traditional jurisdiction theory and the basis The question of the jurisdiction of the case. The American "minimum contact" 's jurisdiction theory can balance the interests of various interests The relationship is worth the affirmation. In our country, the "Location of the equipment" 's jurisdictional model is formed on the basis of the jurisdiction of the traditional tort, and the "The location of the defendant's infringing equipment" should serve as the basis for the main jurisdiction. The "where the plaintiff found the location of the computer terminal, such as the infringing information," can be difficult to determine when it is implemented as a tort. The basis for auxiliary jurisdiction. In addition, the "The plaintiff is the defendant" principle can be adapted to practice as a whole The requirements should be adhered to. These jurisdictional bases and principles are in accordance with the actual situation of our country, which can balance the interests of the parties effectively and benefit the judicial administration of our country. The fourth chapter is to study the case of international domain name disputes. The interest balance in the substantive law. The article divides the international domain name and the trademark dispute into three kinds of domain name, domain name theft and right conflict, and analyzes the legal rules and application of the domestic entities of the United States and China, and the entity rules for the dispute between the domain name and the non-trademark. The fifth chapter discusses the dispute of the international domain name in detail. The balance of interests in the decision-making mechanism. The ICANN mechanism can meet the demand of interest balance in the process of the process, and realize the high efficiency and justice of the procedure; in the case of the entity, it is too focused on the protection of the trademark right and the domain The protection of the interests of the rights and interests is weak. The situation is the environment of the times, the limitation of knowledge and the specific interests. To strengthen the protection of the interests of the rights and interests of the domain, we should perfect the "trunk>" reverse domain name intrusi On " rule. The "Complainant man-made domain name and interest person" can be increased when the machine is mature China's expert adjudicative mechanism is very similar to the ICANN mechanism, and the protection of domain name rights and interests is also weak, so it is necessary to strengthen the mechanism construction in this respect. The real balance of the interests of the parties is the full-text content of the concluding remarks, and the central point of this paper is put forward in a clear way: the theory of interest balance should be used as an international domain name dispute resolution machine In general, the existing dispute settlement mechanism embodies the concept of interest balance better in terms of the process, but it is obviously more important to protect the interests of the traditional rights in terms of the entity, so it is not true The balance of interests between the parties is being maintained. Therefore, in the long run, it is necessary to balance the interests in the interest
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：F49;D997
本文編號：2499579
[Abstract]:The solution of the dispute of the international domain name is an important legal problem of the network, and it is also a hot issue of the leading edge of the legal research. Based on the "balance of interest theory", this paper puts forward the author's own views on the balance of the system of the dispute settlement mechanism. The full text consists of the introduction, the body of the text and the conclusion. The introduction section explains the background and value of the topic, the current research situation at home and abroad, and the study party adopted by the article. Law. Chapter I fully sets out the benefit level The theory of scale. The law is a means of assisting people to achieve a specific purpose. Or a tool. The benefit is the source of the law. The fundamental purpose of the law is not only for the maintenance of interests, but also for the maintenance of the benefit of the fundamental interests of the ruling group. The law is to realize self-balance by setting the rights and obligations and using the balance of interests in the aspects of legislation and the administration of justice. The purpose of the study is to provide a basis for the following research. On the basis of the second chapter, the interest balance in the dispute settlement mechanism of the international domain name is put forward in the second chapter The basic objective of the interests balance of the international domain name dispute settlement mechanism should be to promote the network through the dispute resolution The types of interests involved include national interests, social public interests and the personal interests of the parties. The type of interest balance mainly includes the balance between the interests of the domain name and the traditional rights and the state of the dispute The balance of interests and the balance of interests, including the balance of rights and obligations, and equity and The third chapter probes into the jurisdiction of the international domain name dispute case. The balance of interests under the jurisdiction. Independent jurisdiction system theory, including the theory of network self-government, the theory of jurisdiction relativity and the fourth international space theory, cannot meet the requirements of interest balance and will not be obtained The acceptance of any country. Each country is to deal with the international domain name dispute through the development of the traditional jurisdiction theory and the basis The question of the jurisdiction of the case. The American "minimum contact" 's jurisdiction theory can balance the interests of various interests The relationship is worth the affirmation. In our country, the "Location of the equipment" 's jurisdictional model is formed on the basis of the jurisdiction of the traditional tort, and the "The location of the defendant's infringing equipment" should serve as the basis for the main jurisdiction. The "where the plaintiff found the location of the computer terminal, such as the infringing information," can be difficult to determine when it is implemented as a tort. The basis for auxiliary jurisdiction. In addition, the "The plaintiff is the defendant" principle can be adapted to practice as a whole The requirements should be adhered to. These jurisdictional bases and principles are in accordance with the actual situation of our country, which can balance the interests of the parties effectively and benefit the judicial administration of our country. The fourth chapter is to study the case of international domain name disputes. The interest balance in the substantive law. The article divides the international domain name and the trademark dispute into three kinds of domain name, domain name theft and right conflict, and analyzes the legal rules and application of the domestic entities of the United States and China, and the entity rules for the dispute between the domain name and the non-trademark. The fifth chapter discusses the dispute of the international domain name in detail. The balance of interests in the decision-making mechanism. The ICANN mechanism can meet the demand of interest balance in the process of the process, and realize the high efficiency and justice of the procedure; in the case of the entity, it is too focused on the protection of the trademark right and the domain The protection of the interests of the rights and interests is weak. The situation is the environment of the times, the limitation of knowledge and the specific interests. To strengthen the protection of the interests of the rights and interests of the domain, we should perfect the "trunk>" reverse domain name intrusi On " rule. The "Complainant man-made domain name and interest person" can be increased when the machine is mature China's expert adjudicative mechanism is very similar to the ICANN mechanism, and the protection of domain name rights and interests is also weak, so it is necessary to strengthen the mechanism construction in this respect. The real balance of the interests of the parties is the full-text content of the concluding remarks, and the central point of this paper is put forward in a clear way: the theory of interest balance should be used as an international domain name dispute resolution machine In general, the existing dispute settlement mechanism embodies the concept of interest balance better in terms of the process, but it is obviously more important to protect the interests of the traditional rights in terms of the entity, so it is not true The balance of interests between the parties is being maintained. Therefore, in the long run, it is necessary to balance the interests in the interest
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：F49;D997
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 傅廣宇;;利益法學(xué)[J];比較法研究;2006年06期
2 孫國華，，黃金華;論法律上的利益選擇[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;1995年04期
3 周顯志;熊蕾;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)案件司法管轄權(quán)探析[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2008年11期
4 楊煜;;域名爭議解決機構(gòu)對域名爭議之裁決與域名民事訴訟的關(guān)系[J];法律適用;2006年09期
5 鄢斌;;UDRP網(wǎng)絡(luò)姓名權(quán)保護規(guī)則研究[J];法商研究;2007年02期
6 袁發(fā)強;;確立我國涉外民商事管轄權(quán)的考量因素[J];法學(xué);2006年12期
7 崔明健;試論互聯(lián)網(wǎng)上國際知識產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛的管轄權(quán)[J];河北法學(xué);2005年10期
8 藺建平;高茹;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)域名與商標沖突原因及解決策略研究[J];河北法學(xué);2006年12期
9 胡啟忠;;法律正義與法律價值之關(guān)系辨正[J];河北法學(xué);2010年03期
10 崔明健;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件的侵權(quán)行為地管轄依據(jù)評析[J];河北法學(xué);2010年12期
本文編號：2499579
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2499579.html
