【摘要】：我國《涉外民事關(guān)系法律適用法》第37條規(guī)定了意思自治原則在動產(chǎn)物權(quán)法律適用中的泛化適用,這雖被稱為該法中最具前瞻性和創(chuàng)造性的規(guī)定,但在學界引起了熱議,同時也給實務(wù)帶來了爭議。意思自治原則泛化適用的流弊主要在于:與物權(quán)法定主義相悖,令民法典部分內(nèi)容邏輯不能自洽;易致動產(chǎn)物權(quán)準據(jù)法的分割;增加了司法實踐的困難。沖突法的意思自治原則根源于民法相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的任意性規(guī)范。在現(xiàn)有物權(quán)種類和內(nèi)容的范圍方面仍存在較多的意思自治空間,如適用債權(quán)意思主義物權(quán)變動模式的各類情形;可將意思自治原則在動產(chǎn)物權(quán)沖突法的合理適用限定于此。我國民法典編纂為現(xiàn)行各民事單行法之間的邏輯矛盾和內(nèi)容疏漏提供了難得的修正契機;就動產(chǎn)物權(quán)沖突法中意思自治原則合理適用而言,物權(quán)編可在物權(quán)法定原則的緩和以及區(qū)分原則的進一步明晰方面進行有效的規(guī)范銜接。
[Abstract]:Article 37 of the Law on the Application of Law on Foreign-related Civil Relations stipulates the general application of the principle of autonomy of will in the application of real right in movable property. Although this is called the most forward-looking and creative provision in this law, it has aroused heated discussion in academic circles and brought controversy to practice at the same time. The disadvantages of the generalization and application of the principle of autonomy of will mainly lie in that it is contrary to the legalism of real right, which makes the logic of some contents of the civil code impossible to conform to itself, the division of the applicable law of real right of movable property, and increases the difficulty of judicial practice. The principle of autonomy of will in conflict law is rooted in arbitrary norms in related fields of civil law. There are still more room for autonomy of will in the scope of the existing types and contents of real right, such as the application of creditor's idealism in the mode of real right change, and the reasonable application of the principle of autonomy of will in the conflict law of movable property right can be limited to this. The compilation of civil code in our country provides a rare opportunity to amend the logical contradictions and content omissions between the current civil separate laws. As far as the reasonable application of the principle of autonomy of will in the conflict law of real right of movable property is concerned, the compilation of real right can carry on the effective normative connection in the relaxation of the principle of legality of real right and the further clarification of the principle of distinction.
【作者單位】： 華東政法大學國際法學院;
【基金】：2015年中國法學會部級法學研究課題“法治思維下中國涉外民商事法律體系完善研究”(項目編號:CLS[2015]D150)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D923;D997

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡曉紅;略論我國涉外動產(chǎn)物權(quán)的法律適用[J];蘭州大學學報;1994年02期

2 高文驍;論動產(chǎn)物權(quán)移轉(zhuǎn)與公示原則[J];公安與司法研究.新疆公安司法管理干部學院學報;1998年03期

3 劉愛萍;;特殊動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動中的疑難問題[J];山東審判;2008年01期

4 何智慧;論涉外動產(chǎn)物權(quán)的法律適用[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2000年04期

5 陳盛;張熙;;我國動產(chǎn)物權(quán)登記制度研討[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2011年21期

6 張麗洋;;我國動產(chǎn)物權(quán)登記制度探討[J];大家;2011年10期

7 付蓉;;論我國動產(chǎn)物權(quán)法律適用中的意思自治原則的合理性[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟;2014年03期

8 屈茂輝;;動產(chǎn)物權(quán)登記制度研究[J];河北法學;2006年05期

9 崔建遠;;再論動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動的生效要件[J];法學家;2010年05期

10 俞淵;孫婭娣;;論動產(chǎn)物權(quán)的法律適用——兼評《涉外民事關(guān)系法律適用法》第37條[J];湖北警官學院學報;2012年02期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前8條

1 鄒云翔;自行車實名登記是對動產(chǎn)物權(quán)的侵犯[N];中國經(jīng)濟時報;2007年

2 見習記者 李s，

本文編號：2499419