【摘要】：國(guó)際投資仲裁已成為解決國(guó)際投資爭(zhēng)端的主要爭(zhēng)端解決方式。長(zhǎng)期以來(lái),國(guó)際投資仲裁被指責(zé)缺乏透明度,導(dǎo)致過(guò)分保護(hù)外國(guó)投資者利益而忽略了東道國(guó)的公共利益,從而面臨正當(dāng)性危機(jī)。增加國(guó)際投資仲裁的透明度被認(rèn)為是解決正當(dāng)性危機(jī)的重要途徑之一。 晚近國(guó)際投資仲裁透明度方面的討論和發(fā)展主要集中在仲裁程序以及包括仲裁裁決在內(nèi)的相關(guān)文件的合理公開(kāi)和法庭之友的合理參與兩方面。事實(shí)證明,增加國(guó)際投資仲裁透明度,將提高公眾對(duì)國(guó)際投資仲裁的信任度,為解讀東道國(guó)的投資政策提供參考,從長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)來(lái)看更有利于形成完善的投資環(huán)境和健康的雙邊投資關(guān)系。 通過(guò)對(duì)國(guó)際投資爭(zhēng)端解決中心、聯(lián)合國(guó)國(guó)際貿(mào)易法委員會(huì)以及《北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定》等爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制與規(guī)則在此領(lǐng)域的新發(fā)展進(jìn)行剖析,本文將對(duì)透明度改革的深度和廣度進(jìn)行思考并提出建議。本文的論述將表明國(guó)際投資仲裁的透明度與秘密性存在沖突但可以并存;主張國(guó)際投資仲裁應(yīng)當(dāng)堅(jiān)持以秘密性為原則同時(shí)需保有一定的透明度;并指出面對(duì)透明度改革的趨勢(shì),中國(guó)應(yīng)當(dāng)積極應(yīng)對(duì)。
[Abstract]:International investment arbitration has become the main way to settle international investment disputes. For a long time, international investment arbitration has been accused of lack of transparency, resulting in excessive protection of the interests of foreign investors and neglect of the public interest of the host country, thus facing the legitimacy crisis. Increasing the transparency of international investment arbitration is considered to be one of the important ways to solve the legitimacy crisis. In recent years, the discussion and development of transparency in international investment arbitration mainly focused on the reasonable disclosure of arbitration procedures and relevant documents, including arbitral awards, and the reasonable participation of amicus curiae. It has been proved that increasing transparency in international investment arbitration will increase public confidence in international investment arbitration and provide a reference for understanding the investment policies of host countries, In the long run, it is more conducive to the formation of a sound investment environment and healthy bilateral investment relationship. Through the analysis of new developments in this area, such as the International Centre for the settlement of Investment disputes, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law and the North American Free Trade Agreement, and other dispute settlement mechanisms and rules, This paper will think about the depth and breadth of transparency reform and put forward some suggestions. The discussion in this paper will show that the transparency and confidentiality of international investment arbitration are in conflict but can coexist, and that international investment arbitration should adhere to the principle of confidentiality at the same time to maintain a certain degree of transparency, while maintaining a certain degree of transparency in international investment arbitration. And pointed out that in the face of the trend of transparency reform, China should actively respond.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：外交學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D996.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 石慧;以條約為基礎(chǔ)的投資者與國(guó)家間仲裁機(jī)制的評(píng)判[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2436311