外空軍事化的法律學說評析
發(fā)布時間：2019-02-18 08:48
【摘要】：外空法對外空軍事化這一概念沒有明確界定,因此國際社會對外空軍事化存在不同的解讀,并形成了相應的法律學說。禁止外空軍事化說認為,人類利用外空應出于和平目的,而一切形式的外空軍事化都是與和平目的相違背的。允許外空軍事化學說認為不僅被動的外空軍事化是正當?shù)?而且主動的外空武器化也是正當?shù)�。部分禁止外空軍事化學說則反對毫無限制的外空武器化,但認可在一定范圍內(nèi)的外空軍事化利用。第一種學說過于理想主義而且與現(xiàn)行法律并不相符;第二種學說是霸權主義和冒險主義的體現(xiàn),將導致外空軍備競賽,并可能帶來眾多惡果;第三種觀點更趨現(xiàn)實主義,但需要凝聚共識,以構筑可操作的法律機制。面對由安全困境所導致的軍備競賽的可能性,必須通過國際法來緩解困境,尋求外層空間的共同安全。
[Abstract]:The concept of outer space militarization is not clearly defined in outer space law, so the international community has different interpretations of outer space militarization and forms the corresponding legal doctrine. The theory of banning the militarization of outer space holds that the use of outer space by mankind should be for peaceful purposes, and all forms of militarization of outer space are contrary to peaceful purposes. The doctrine of allowing the militarization of outer space is justified not only by passive militarization of outer space, but also by active weaponization of outer space. Part of the theory of banning the militarization of outer space opposes the weaponization of outer space without restriction, but accepts the militarization of outer space to a certain extent. The first doctrine is too idealistic and inconsistent with existing laws; the second is a manifestation of hegemonism and adventurism, which will lead to an arms race in outer space and may have many adverse consequences; The third view is more realistic, but requires consensus to build an operational legal mechanism. In the face of the possibility of an arms race caused by security dilemmas, the dilemma must be alleviated through international law and the common security of outer space must be pursued.
【作者單位】： 哈爾濱工業(yè)大學法學院;
【基金】：司法部2008年度“國際法治與法學理論研究項目‘外空非武器化的發(fā)展構建’”(08SFB5027)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D999.1
本文編號：2425687
[Abstract]:The concept of outer space militarization is not clearly defined in outer space law, so the international community has different interpretations of outer space militarization and forms the corresponding legal doctrine. The theory of banning the militarization of outer space holds that the use of outer space by mankind should be for peaceful purposes, and all forms of militarization of outer space are contrary to peaceful purposes. The doctrine of allowing the militarization of outer space is justified not only by passive militarization of outer space, but also by active weaponization of outer space. Part of the theory of banning the militarization of outer space opposes the weaponization of outer space without restriction, but accepts the militarization of outer space to a certain extent. The first doctrine is too idealistic and inconsistent with existing laws; the second is a manifestation of hegemonism and adventurism, which will lead to an arms race in outer space and may have many adverse consequences; The third view is more realistic, but requires consensus to build an operational legal mechanism. In the face of the possibility of an arms race caused by security dilemmas, the dilemma must be alleviated through international law and the common security of outer space must be pursued.
【作者單位】： 哈爾濱工業(yè)大學法學院;
【基金】：司法部2008年度“國際法治與法學理論研究項目‘外空非武器化的發(fā)展構建’”(08SFB5027)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D999.1
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前1條
1 李壽平;;外層空間的軍事化利用及其法律規(guī)制[J];法商研究;2007年03期
【共引文獻】
相關期刊論文 前2條
1 凌巖;;試論對月球和其他天體的所有權[J];北京航空航天大學學報(社會科學版);2006年02期
2 王孔祥;太空軍備競賽對外層空間法的挑戰(zhàn)[J];武漢大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2005年03期
相關碩士學位論文 前1條
1 曹文娟;《外空條約》第二條“不得據(jù)為己有”原則研究[D];中國政法大學;2007年
【二級參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前1條
1 李壽平;;外層空間的軍事化利用及其法律規(guī)制[J];法商研究;2007年03期
相關碩士學位論文 前1條
1 黃嘉;外空倫理研究[D];國防科學技術大學;2006年
【相似文獻】
相關重要報紙文章 前1條
1 李萬順 萬水獻;太空法律戰(zhàn)呼之欲出[N];解放軍報;2004年
相關碩士學位論文 前3條
1 曹永根;防止外空武器化的法律途徑[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學;2010年
2 周艷麗;防止外空武器化的國際法律制度探析[D];中國政法大學;2009年
3 王博;外空軍事化法律規(guī)制研究[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學;2010年
，本文編號：2425687
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2425687.html
