【摘要】：民族民間文藝的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)是一個歷久彌新的法律課題。世界各國及國際組織半個世紀(jì)以來的各種法律成果,在取得若干經(jīng)驗(yàn)的同時,在民族民間文藝范圍、立法目的、基本原則、主要規(guī)則等方面依然存在諸多問題。文章提出,應(yīng)把不具有知識產(chǎn)權(quán)意義的事項、具有"準(zhǔn)工業(yè)產(chǎn)權(quán)意義"的事項、民族民間文藝衍生作品的創(chuàng)造性部分、"思想"等公共領(lǐng)域要素排出保護(hù)范圍;應(yīng)把保護(hù)民族民間文藝的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)和民族民間文藝的文化價值確定為民族民間文藝保護(hù)制度的立法目的;把激勵創(chuàng)新原則、利益平衡原則、二分法原則、集體性原則、傳統(tǒng)性原則確定為民族民間文藝保護(hù)制度的基本原則;把有關(guān)少數(shù)民族或其村寨確定為民族民間文藝的權(quán)利主體;將獨(dú)創(chuàng)性、集體性、傳統(tǒng)性確定為民族民間文藝的保護(hù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn);務(wù)虛與務(wù)實(shí)相結(jié)合,確定民族民間文藝的權(quán)利內(nèi)容與保護(hù)期限。
[Abstract]:The intellectual property protection of national folk literature and art is an old and new legal subject. In the past half century, various countries and international organizations in the world have obtained some experience, but there are still many problems in the scope of national and folk literature and art, legislative purpose, basic principles, main rules and so on. The article puts forward that the items which have no meaning of intellectual property rights, those with "quasi-industrial property rights", the creative part of national folk literature and art derivative works, and the elements of public domain such as "thought" should be excluded from the scope of protection. The protection of intellectual property rights of national folk literature and art and the cultural value of national folk literature and art should be defined as the legislative purpose of the protection system of national folk literature and art; The principle of encouraging innovation, the principle of balancing interests, the principle of dichotomy, the principle of collectivity and the principle of tradition are defined as the basic principles of the protection system of national folk literature and art, and the relevant minorities or their villages are defined as the subject of the right of national folk literature and art. This paper defines the originality, collectivity and tradition as the protection standard of the national folk literature and art, and determines the content of the right and the period of protection of the national folk literature and art.
【作者單位】： 暨南大學(xué)法學(xué)院/知識產(chǎn)權(quán)學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金特別委托項目“貫徹科學(xué)發(fā)展觀,實(shí)施知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略研究”(項目編號:08@ZH003)階段性成果
【分類號】：D997.1;D913

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 張玉敏;;民間文學(xué)藝術(shù)法律保護(hù)模式的選擇[J];法商研究;2007年04期

2 嚴(yán)永和;;論商標(biāo)法的創(chuàng)新與傳統(tǒng)名號的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)[J];法商研究;2006年04期

3 馬俊毅;席隆乾;;論“族格”——試探民族平等與民族自治、民族自決的哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)[J];民族研究;2007年01期

4 崔國斌;否棄集體作者觀——民間文藝版權(quán)難題的終結(jié)[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2005年05期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 彭學(xué)龍;張奕峰;;“藍(lán)色風(fēng)暴”考量“反向混淆”[J];中華商標(biāo);2006年11期

2 李現(xiàn)平;;比較教育學(xué)與比較文學(xué)握握手[J];比較教育研究;2006年10期

3 陳`，

本文編號：2423609