《TRIPS協(xié)議》及《多哈宣言》下藥品專利法律問題研究
[Abstract]:The implementation of the TRIPS Agreement forced developing countries to adopt the same standards as developed countries to protect intellectual property rights. Under the requirements of the TRIPS Agreement, drugs, a special commodity related to human health and life, must also be protected by patents. When drugs are patented, patentees obtain exclusive rights, which make the price of drugs very expensive because of lack of competition. Patients in developing countries cannot afford such expensive drugs. The conflict between the public health interests and the interests of the patentee has become acute. The adoption of the Doha Declaration points the way for developing countries to solve public health problems within the framework of the TRIPS-making full use of the < TRIPS Agreement The flexibility granted for public health purposes to develop and implement its drug patent system. From the perspective of international law, this paper examines the development, rules and defects of the drug patent system under the "TRIPS Agreement", and makes a systematic analysis of the flexibility provisions of the "TRIPS Agreement" concerning the protection of public health. This paper discusses the problems and countermeasures faced by the international community and China in the face of public health problems. In terms of structure, this paper is divided into three chapters: chapter one, "TRIPS Agreement" and Drug Patent, this chapter first reviews the background of the signing of the "TRIPS Agreement" and the impact of its implementation on the drug patent system of the members of WTO. Patent protection is the direct result of the implementation of the TRIPS Agreement and the direct cause of the high drug price. Then it discusses the contradiction between the protection of drug patents and the maintenance of public health, and reflects on the drug patent system under the framework of TRIPS, and points out that the "TRIPS Agreement" emphasizes too much on the protection of the interests of drug patentees. It is harmful to the public health interests of the developing countries, and has a negative impact on the drug research and development and the pharmaceutical industry in the developing countries. The second chapter, "the response of the Doha Declaration to Public Health issues", mainly discusses the background of the signing of the Doha Declaration, its content, significance and subsequent development. This chapter points out that the public health crisis caused by the problem of drug accessibility in developing countries makes the international community have a new understanding of the private rights of patentees and the right to health of the public and ultimately lead to the adoption of the Doha Declaration. This chapter also illustrates the flexible provisions of the TRIPS Agreement that can be used to solve public health problems. The research and utilization of these provisions will benefit developing countries to maintain public health. The third chapter, "Strategies to solve public health problems in China", mainly involves the methods and approaches of solving public health problems under the framework of "TRIPS Agreement". First of all, this paper summarizes the drug patent system in China, and evaluates it from the perspective of public health. It mainly focuses on the measures that are not fully utilized in the pharmaceutical patent system in China. Secondly, this chapter also analyzes that it is necessary to enforce compulsory licensing of patented drugs to increase the competition of generic drugs and to benefit the public. Finally, this chapter points out that drug patents should be reviewed from a public health perspective to encourage drug research and development.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:D997.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 呂巖峰;徐唐棠;;TRIPS協(xié)定之下的中國藥品專利保護(hù)立法[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2006年03期
2 史學(xué)瀛;張春玲;;我國解決公共健康危機(jī)的法律策略探析[J];河北法學(xué);2008年04期
3 古元;;公共健康:怎一個窮字了得[J];WTO經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)刊;2003年01期
4 朱菲娜;;現(xiàn)在就可以行動起來[J];WTO經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)刊;2003年01期
5 李金亮;;中國制藥企業(yè)代表的聲音:中國企業(yè)具備國際公認(rèn)的能力[J];WTO經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)刊;2003年01期
6 凱倫諾爾;;在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)和公共健康上多哈宣言邁出正確的一步[J];WTO經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)刊;2003年01期
相關(guān)會議論文 前6條
1 文希凱;;藥品專利與TRIPS協(xié)議——評WTO協(xié)議《“TRIPS協(xié)議和公共健康宣言”第6段的執(zhí)行》[A];專利法研究(2003)[C];2003年
2 Nathan Ford;David Wilson;Gabriela Costa Chaves;Michel Lotrowska;Kannikar Kijtiwatchakul;韓志杰;;巴西、泰國持續(xù)獲得抗逆轉(zhuǎn)錄病毒治療的經(jīng)驗[A];專利法研究(2007)[C];2008年
3 Carlos M.Correa;于群;;從公共健康的角度看待藥品專利審查[A];專利法研究(2007)[C];2008年
4 Gabriela Costa Chaves;Maria Auxiliadora Oliveira;胡安琪;;拉美和加勒比海國家對TRIPS協(xié)議的執(zhí)行:以公共健康的視角分析工業(yè)產(chǎn)權(quán)立法[A];專利法研究(2007)[C];2008年
5 Marcela Fogaca Vieira;Renata Reis;Gabriela Costa Chaves;胡安琪;;巴西的藥品可及性與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)問題:民間社會的反應(yīng)和策略[A];專利法研究(2008)[C];2009年
6 胡愛倫;胡元瓊;;在確保可及的同時進(jìn)行創(chuàng)新:全球醫(yī)藥研發(fā)體系改革政策及建議[A];專利法研究(2008)[C];2009年
本文編號:2361887
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2361887.html