亞太經(jīng)合組織（APEC）爭端解決方法研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-27 16:19
【摘要】：第二次世界大戰(zhàn)以來,經(jīng)濟全球化和區(qū)域經(jīng)濟一體化成為全球經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的兩種主要趨勢。近年來,隨著全球經(jīng)濟的深入推進,區(qū)域經(jīng)濟一體化的走勢也在日益加強,各種區(qū)域貿(mào)易安排方興未艾。 亞太經(jīng)合組織(APEC)作為亞太地區(qū)一個重要的區(qū)域經(jīng)濟安排,自成立以來在推動亞太地區(qū)貿(mào)易投資自由化和經(jīng)濟技術(shù)合作、促進地區(qū)經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展等方面做出了突出貢獻。伴隨著區(qū)域貿(mào)易的發(fā)展,亞太經(jīng)合組織成員方之間的爭端也日益增多,如何完善自身的爭端解決方法成為亞太經(jīng)合組織必須面對的現(xiàn)實問題。本文以亞太經(jīng)合組織爭端解決方法為切入點,綜合運用法律經(jīng)濟學(xué)理論、法的價值理論及比較研究方法,試圖對完善亞太經(jīng)合組織爭端解決方法進行分析和研究。 首先,本文介紹了區(qū)域貿(mào)易安排與國際爭端解決方法,指出爭端解決方法是區(qū)域貿(mào)易安排必不可少的組成部分,同時分析了區(qū)域爭端解決方法的發(fā)展趨勢,為下文展開論述作出鋪墊。 其次,本文從亞太經(jīng)合組織的發(fā)展沿革和法律特征入手,介紹了亞太經(jīng)合組織的發(fā)展情況,亞太經(jīng)合組織爭端解決方法的現(xiàn)狀和基本實踐情況,并在此基礎(chǔ)上對此進行深入分析,總結(jié)現(xiàn)有爭端解決方法的缺陷。 再次,提出完善亞太經(jīng)合組織爭端解決方法的設(shè)想,這是本文的核心和創(chuàng)新之處。在對亞太經(jīng)合組織爭端解決方法進行分析后,結(jié)合法律經(jīng)濟學(xué)理論和法的價值理論,論證完善亞太經(jīng)合組織爭端解決方法的必要性和可行性,闡述了完善亞太經(jīng)濟組織爭端解決方法的考量因素,并將亞太經(jīng)合組織與其他區(qū)域貿(mào)易安排相比較,提出完善亞太經(jīng)合組織爭端解決方法的建議。 最后,我國作為亞太經(jīng)合組織的重要成員方之一,應(yīng)該積極參與完善亞太經(jīng)合組織爭端解決方法的談判和合作,從宏觀上明確政策定位,微觀上完善國內(nèi)機構(gòu),爭取主動應(yīng)對,切實維護好我國的經(jīng)濟利益。
[Abstract]:Since the second World War, economic globalization and regional economic integration have become two main trends of global economic development. In recent years, with the deepening of the global economy, the trend of regional economic integration is also increasingly strengthened, various regional trade arrangements are in the ascendant. As an important regional economic arrangement in the Asia-Pacific region, APEC (APEC) has made outstanding contributions in promoting trade and investment liberalization, economic and technological cooperation and regional economic development in the Asia-Pacific region since its establishment. With the development of regional trade, there are more and more disputes among APEC members. This paper takes the dispute settlement method of APEC as the breakthrough point, synthetically applies the law economics theory, the law value theory and the comparative research method, attempts to perfect the APEC dispute settlement method to carry on the analysis and the research. Firstly, this paper introduces the regional trade arrangement and the international dispute settlement method, points out that the dispute settlement method is an essential part of the regional trade arrangement, and analyzes the development trend of the regional dispute settlement method. For the following discussion to pave the way. Secondly, starting with the development and legal characteristics of APEC, this paper introduces the development of APEC, the status quo and basic practice of APEC dispute settlement methods. And on the basis of in-depth analysis of this, summed up the shortcomings of the existing dispute settlement methods. Thirdly, it is the core and innovation of this paper to put forward the idea of perfecting APEC dispute settlement method. After analyzing the dispute settlement methods of APEC, combining the theory of law and economics and the value theory of law, the paper demonstrates the necessity and feasibility of perfecting the dispute settlement method of APEC. This paper expounds the consideration factors of perfecting the dispute settlement method of APEC, and compares APEC with other regional trade arrangements, and puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the dispute settlement method of APEC. Finally, as an important member of APEC, Fang Zhi, China should actively participate in the negotiations and cooperation to improve the dispute settlement methods of APEC, define the policy position at the macro level, improve domestic institutions at the micro level, and strive for an active response. We will earnestly safeguard our economic interests.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.1
本文編號：2361422
[Abstract]:Since the second World War, economic globalization and regional economic integration have become two main trends of global economic development. In recent years, with the deepening of the global economy, the trend of regional economic integration is also increasingly strengthened, various regional trade arrangements are in the ascendant. As an important regional economic arrangement in the Asia-Pacific region, APEC (APEC) has made outstanding contributions in promoting trade and investment liberalization, economic and technological cooperation and regional economic development in the Asia-Pacific region since its establishment. With the development of regional trade, there are more and more disputes among APEC members. This paper takes the dispute settlement method of APEC as the breakthrough point, synthetically applies the law economics theory, the law value theory and the comparative research method, attempts to perfect the APEC dispute settlement method to carry on the analysis and the research. Firstly, this paper introduces the regional trade arrangement and the international dispute settlement method, points out that the dispute settlement method is an essential part of the regional trade arrangement, and analyzes the development trend of the regional dispute settlement method. For the following discussion to pave the way. Secondly, starting with the development and legal characteristics of APEC, this paper introduces the development of APEC, the status quo and basic practice of APEC dispute settlement methods. And on the basis of in-depth analysis of this, summed up the shortcomings of the existing dispute settlement methods. Thirdly, it is the core and innovation of this paper to put forward the idea of perfecting APEC dispute settlement method. After analyzing the dispute settlement methods of APEC, combining the theory of law and economics and the value theory of law, the paper demonstrates the necessity and feasibility of perfecting the dispute settlement method of APEC. This paper expounds the consideration factors of perfecting the dispute settlement method of APEC, and compares APEC with other regional trade arrangements, and puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the dispute settlement method of APEC. Finally, as an important member of APEC, Fang Zhi, China should actively participate in the negotiations and cooperation to improve the dispute settlement methods of APEC, define the policy position at the macro level, improve domestic institutions at the micro level, and strive for an active response. We will earnestly safeguard our economic interests.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.1
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 楊江濤;論APEC運作模式的制度化[J];寶雞文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年03期
2 沈偉;試論APEC爭端解決機制[J];東北亞論壇;1997年01期
3 韋經(jīng)建,王小林;論CEPA的性質(zhì)、效力及其爭議解決模式[J];當代法學(xué);2004年03期
4 沈偉;試論亞太經(jīng)合組織爭端解決機制的建立[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;1996年02期
5 祝軍;APEC爭端調(diào)解機制問題的由來與發(fā)展[J];國際問題研究;1997年03期
6 蔡鵬鴻;亞太自由貿(mào)易區(qū)對APEC機制化進程的影響[J];世界經(jīng)濟研究;2005年02期
7 徐永志,高波;APEC爭端解決機制模式探討[J];金融教學(xué)與研究;2001年04期
8 王培志;馬兆慶;;區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定與多邊貿(mào)易體制[J];山東財政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年02期
9 盛斌;;亞太自由貿(mào)易區(qū)的政治經(jīng)濟分析:中國視角[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治;2007年03期
10 龔柏華;;區(qū)域貿(mào)易安排爭端解決機制比較研究[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動態(tài)與研究;2005年08期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條
1 劉華 屠梅曾;[N];國際金融報;2002年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 喻洋;區(qū)域貿(mào)易安排爭端解決機制比較研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2006年
2 金瑩;中國—東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)爭端解決機制研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年
3 王帆;大中華自由貿(mào)易區(qū)爭端解決機制的構(gòu)建[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2008年
，本文編號：2361422
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2361422.html
