碳關(guān)稅法律制度構(gòu)建研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-06 11:29
【摘要】：由于世界各國都在開始關(guān)注氣候變化問題,因此,各國都在極力推行CO2等溫室氣體的節(jié)能減排措施。最初,人們所關(guān)注的環(huán)境問題,只限于一國自己的內(nèi)部問題,并沒有超越國界。歐盟與美國等發(fā)達國家的國內(nèi)立法中都有有關(guān)于氣候變化條款。因此,一國的國內(nèi)法是環(huán)境保護法的淵源之一。但是,氣候變化屬于全球性環(huán)境問題,所以并不像傳統(tǒng)的環(huán)境問題。所以本文認為,國際法應當在世界氣候變化的減緩中扮演重要角色。 在歷經(jīng)多次國際氣候變化會議之后,發(fā)達國家把碳關(guān)稅作為減緩氣候惡化的重要手段,并在其氣候變化的國內(nèi)立法中制定碳關(guān)稅條款,而且還表明了自己的立場。但是,根據(jù)國際氣候變化相關(guān)協(xié)議的規(guī)定,碳減排責任只由發(fā)達國家來承擔,與發(fā)展中國家無關(guān)。因此,一些發(fā)達國家在其國內(nèi)氣候立法中具體規(guī)定了碳關(guān)稅條款,以此米壓迫友展中國家與其實施同標準的碳減排義務,這無疑是給友展中國家?guī)砹司薮筇魬?zhàn)和危機。 歐美等發(fā)達國家提出碳關(guān)稅的目的,主要是針對中國的節(jié)能減排。但是,中國是個負責任的大國,中國在應對全球氣候變化、減少溫室氣體排放量上,已經(jīng)做出了許多努力。 本文首先闡述了碳關(guān)稅產(chǎn)生的背景及碳關(guān)稅法律制度的基本理論,并在基本理論的基礎之上詳細分析了歐美等發(fā)達國家征收碳關(guān)稅的目的及其可能性。其次,對歐盟和美國的碳關(guān)稅法律制度進行簡要的分析并進行比較,站在歐美國家的角度來看碳關(guān)稅,他們是積極推行碳關(guān)稅條款倡導者。再次,通過以上的論述分析,本文提出應當構(gòu)建一個國際層面的碳關(guān)稅法律制度,構(gòu)建國際層面的碳關(guān)稅法律制度,又必須堅持“共同但有區(qū)別的責任”、“特殊與差別待遇”及“比例原則”等基本原則,并對國際碳關(guān)稅法律制度構(gòu)建的實體規(guī)則進行構(gòu)想。最后,本文又從國際、國內(nèi)層面上,中國應當如何應對碳關(guān)稅法律制度提出了建議。仕國際上,我國應當積極開展“環(huán)境外交”,積極參與國際碳排放標準制定；在國內(nèi)層面上,中國應當立法支持技術(shù)革新,加快國內(nèi)經(jīng)濟結(jié)構(gòu)升級,發(fā)展低碳環(huán)保經(jīng)濟,降低碳輕度,消除被征收碳關(guān)稅理由。
[Abstract]:Because the world is beginning to pay attention to the issue of climate change, therefore, all countries are vigorously promoting CO2 and other greenhouse gas energy conservation and emission reduction measures. Initially, concerns about the environment were limited to a country's own internal problems, and did not transcend national boundaries. The European Union and the United States and other developed countries have provisions on climate change in their domestic legislation. Therefore, the domestic law of a country is one of the sources of environmental protection law. However, climate change is a global environmental problem, so it is not like traditional environmental problems. Therefore, international law should play an important role in the mitigation of world climate change. After many international climate change conferences, developed countries regard carbon tariffs as an important means to slow climate deterioration, and make carbon tariff provisions in their domestic climate change legislation, and also make their own stand. However, under international climate change-related agreements, the responsibility for reducing carbon emissions rests only with developed countries, not with developing countries. Therefore, some developed countries have specified the carbon tariff provisions in their domestic climate legislation, so as to oppress the countries in the exhibition to implement the same standard carbon emission reduction obligations, which undoubtedly brings great challenges and crises to the countries in the exhibition. Europe and the United States and other developed countries put forward carbon tariffs, mainly aimed at China's energy-saving and emission reduction. But China is a responsible power, and it has done a lot to tackle global climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In this paper, the background of carbon tariff and the basic theory of carbon tariff legal system are expounded, and the purpose and possibility of carbon tariff collection in developed countries such as Europe and America are analyzed in detail on the basis of basic theory. Secondly, the European Union and the United States of America carbon tariff legal system of a brief analysis and comparison, from the point of view of Europe and the United States carbon tariffs, they are actively promote carbon tariff provisions. Thirdly, through the above discussion and analysis, this paper puts forward that we should construct a carbon tariff legal system at the international level and a carbon tariff legal system at the international level, and we must adhere to the "common but differentiated responsibilities". The basic principles of "special and differential treatment" and "proportionality principle", and the substantive rules of international carbon tariff legal system are conceived. Finally, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to deal with the carbon tariff law system at the international and domestic level. Internationally, China should actively carry out "environmental diplomacy" and take an active part in the establishment of international carbon emission standards. At the domestic level, China should legislate to support technological innovation, accelerate the upgrading of domestic economic structure, develop a low-carbon environment-friendly economy, reduce carbon mildly, and eliminate the reasons for carbon tariffs imposed.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.9
本文編號：2314140
[Abstract]:Because the world is beginning to pay attention to the issue of climate change, therefore, all countries are vigorously promoting CO2 and other greenhouse gas energy conservation and emission reduction measures. Initially, concerns about the environment were limited to a country's own internal problems, and did not transcend national boundaries. The European Union and the United States and other developed countries have provisions on climate change in their domestic legislation. Therefore, the domestic law of a country is one of the sources of environmental protection law. However, climate change is a global environmental problem, so it is not like traditional environmental problems. Therefore, international law should play an important role in the mitigation of world climate change. After many international climate change conferences, developed countries regard carbon tariffs as an important means to slow climate deterioration, and make carbon tariff provisions in their domestic climate change legislation, and also make their own stand. However, under international climate change-related agreements, the responsibility for reducing carbon emissions rests only with developed countries, not with developing countries. Therefore, some developed countries have specified the carbon tariff provisions in their domestic climate legislation, so as to oppress the countries in the exhibition to implement the same standard carbon emission reduction obligations, which undoubtedly brings great challenges and crises to the countries in the exhibition. Europe and the United States and other developed countries put forward carbon tariffs, mainly aimed at China's energy-saving and emission reduction. But China is a responsible power, and it has done a lot to tackle global climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In this paper, the background of carbon tariff and the basic theory of carbon tariff legal system are expounded, and the purpose and possibility of carbon tariff collection in developed countries such as Europe and America are analyzed in detail on the basis of basic theory. Secondly, the European Union and the United States of America carbon tariff legal system of a brief analysis and comparison, from the point of view of Europe and the United States carbon tariffs, they are actively promote carbon tariff provisions. Thirdly, through the above discussion and analysis, this paper puts forward that we should construct a carbon tariff legal system at the international level and a carbon tariff legal system at the international level, and we must adhere to the "common but differentiated responsibilities". The basic principles of "special and differential treatment" and "proportionality principle", and the substantive rules of international carbon tariff legal system are conceived. Finally, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to deal with the carbon tariff law system at the international and domestic level. Internationally, China should actively carry out "environmental diplomacy" and take an active part in the establishment of international carbon emission standards. At the domestic level, China should legislate to support technological innovation, accelerate the upgrading of domestic economic structure, develop a low-carbon environment-friendly economy, reduce carbon mildly, and eliminate the reasons for carbon tariffs imposed.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.9
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 盛立中;;碳關(guān)稅開征路線圖及其經(jīng)濟效應[J];國際商務財會;2010年02期
2 魏圣香;;碳關(guān)稅條款研究:基本理論、立法模式與應對之策[J];甘肅政法學院學報;2011年06期
3 呂江;;《哥本哈根協(xié)議》:軟法在國際氣候制度中的作用[J];西部法學評論;2010年04期
4 周劍;何建坤;;北歐國家碳稅政策的研究及啟示[J];環(huán)境保護;2008年22期
5 李靜云;;“碳關(guān)稅”重壓下的中國戰(zhàn)略[J];環(huán)境經(jīng)濟;2009年09期
6 邊永民;;論共同但有區(qū)別的責任原則在國際環(huán)境法中的地位[J];暨南學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年04期
7 樊綱;;不如我們自己先征碳關(guān)稅[J];資源再生;2009年09期
8 吳益民;;論WTO貿(mào)易與環(huán)境政策的撞擊與協(xié)調(diào)[J];南昌大學學報(人文社會科學版);2008年02期
9 吳力波;;“自愿性減排”抑或“碳關(guān)稅倒逼”——中國在“后哥本哈根”階段的道路選擇[J];人才開發(fā);2010年01期
10 孫曉霓;;論新型綠色貿(mào)易壁壘“碳關(guān)稅”[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2009年26期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條
1 蘇明 傅志華 許文 王志剛 李欣 梁強;[N];中國財經(jīng)報;2009年
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前2條
1 陳永超;碳關(guān)稅的理論機制及對中國的影響研究[D];北京林業(yè)大學;2011年
2 唐啟寧;WTO體制下碳關(guān)稅問題研究[D];西南政法大學;2010年
，本文編號：2314140
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2314140.html
