【摘要】： 摘要:作為全球經濟交往中解決各國商事主體之間爭議的重要方式,國際商事仲裁一直處在自我完善和發(fā)展的過程中。臨時措施制度正是從無到有被納入國際商事仲裁,并在實踐中逐漸取得了合法存在的地位。但同時臨時措施也是一把“雙刃劍”。一方面,臨時措施有利于仲裁程序的順利進行及仲裁裁決的有效執(zhí)行;另一方面,臨時措施如被濫用將會對該措施針對的當事人造成無法彌補的損失和不公平。因此,合理設計臨時措施的法律制度就顯得尤為重要。長久以來,由于各國仲裁臨時措施的法律制度不夠完善,導致臨時措施在國際商事仲裁實踐中遇到了許多問題,直接影響了國際商事仲裁的功效�！秶H商事仲裁示范法》第17條關于臨時措施的新規(guī)定代表國際商事仲裁臨時措施的最新發(fā)展。反觀我國的立法與實踐,法律至今未對仲裁臨時措施作出一般性的規(guī)定,這不僅使我國的仲裁立法和實踐落后于國際商事仲裁的發(fā)展趨勢,也不便于仲裁庭充分利用臨時措施輔助其作出公正的裁決,更重要的是不能對申請人提供全方位的保護,這些缺陷最終降低了我國仲裁事業(yè)的國際競爭力。本文在對相關仲裁規(guī)則、仲裁立法和仲裁案例關于臨時措施的處理模式進行比較分析的基礎上,評述了我國關于臨時措施的仲裁立法及實踐,認為應借鑒國際經驗來完善我國臨時措施法律制度,為我國國際商事仲裁事業(yè)的健康發(fā)展創(chuàng)造良好的法制環(huán)境。本文主要采用比較分析和實證分析的方法,全文共分五章。 第一章分析了國際商事仲裁臨時措施產生的法律背景,首先介紹了國際商事仲裁臨時措施的歷史由來和現(xiàn)實發(fā)展,接著從不同視角闡明其在國際商事仲裁中的價值取向,最后從實踐運用中說明它的意義。 第二章主要介紹國際商事仲裁臨時措施的法律屬性。首先界定了臨時措施的定義和特征,接著介紹了臨時措施有哪些具體類型,最后比較分析了它和英美法系以及大陸法系相關訴訟制度的異同。 第三章分別從以下三個方面加以論述:由仲裁庭排他性發(fā)布臨時措施存在的的障礙;由法院排他性發(fā)布臨時措施存在的障礙;總結了各大仲裁機構仲裁規(guī)則和各國仲裁法關于臨時措施發(fā)布權分配的規(guī)定,得出兩者逐漸趨同的結論。 第四章闡述了臨時措施域外執(zhí)行的相關法律問題。首先說明了臨時措施發(fā)布和執(zhí)行的形式,接著論述了臨時措施的執(zhí)行能否適用《紐約公約》,隨后介紹了各國協(xié)助仲裁庭域外執(zhí)行臨時措施的司法實踐,最后闡述了《國際商事仲裁示范法》的規(guī)則。 第五章從我國國際商事仲裁臨時制度的發(fā)布時間、執(zhí)行對象、決定權以及法院審查及發(fā)布臨時措施的機構四個方面分析了我國國際商事仲裁臨時措施的法律規(guī)定,指出了缺陷,提出了完善的建議。
[Abstract]:Absrtact: as an important way to solve the disputes between commercial subjects in global economic exchanges, international commercial arbitration has been in the process of self-improvement and development. The system of interim measures was brought into international commercial arbitration from scratch and gradually gained the status of legal existence in practice. But temporary measures are also a double-edged sword. On the one hand, interim measures are conducive to the smooth conduct of arbitration proceedings and the effective enforcement of arbitral awards; on the other hand, the abuse of interim measures will cause irreparable losses and unfairness to the party against whom the measure is directed. Therefore, the reasonable design of temporary measures of the legal system is particularly important. For a long time, due to the imperfect legal system of arbitration interim measures in various countries, interim measures have encountered many problems in the practice of international commercial arbitration. The new provisions on interim measures in Article 17 of the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration represent the latest development of interim measures in international commercial arbitration. Looking back at our country's legislation and practice, the law has not made general provisions on the interim measures of arbitration, which not only makes our arbitration legislation and practice lag behind the development trend of international commercial arbitration. It is also not convenient for the arbitral tribunal to make full use of interim measures to assist it in making a fair ruling. More importantly, it cannot provide all aspects of protection to the applicant, which ultimately reduces the international competitiveness of China's arbitration cause. On the basis of comparative analysis of the relevant arbitration rules, arbitration legislation and the handling mode of interim measures in arbitration cases, this paper reviews the arbitration legislation and practice on interim measures in China. It is suggested that we should use international experience for reference to perfect the legal system of China's interim measures and create a good legal environment for the healthy development of the cause of international commercial arbitration in China. This paper mainly uses the method of comparative analysis and empirical analysis, the full text is divided into five chapters. The first chapter analyzes the legal background of interim measures in international commercial arbitration, first introduces the history and development of interim measures in international commercial arbitration, and then expounds the value orientation of interim measures in international commercial arbitration from different perspectives. Finally, its significance is explained in practice. The second chapter mainly introduces the legal attribute of the interim measure of international commercial arbitration. Firstly, it defines the definition and characteristics of interim measures, then introduces the specific types of interim measures, and finally compares and analyzes the similarities and differences between interim measures and the related litigation systems of Anglo-American law system and civil law system. The third chapter discusses the following three aspects: the obstacles to the exclusive issuance of interim measures by the arbitral tribunal, the obstacles to the exclusive issuance of interim measures by the court; This paper summarizes the rules of arbitration of major arbitration institutions and the provisions of the arbitration laws of various countries on the distribution of the power to issue interim measures, and draws a conclusion that the two are gradually converging. The fourth chapter expounds the relevant legal issues of the extraterritorial implementation of interim measures. First of all, it describes the form of issuance and enforcement of interim measures, then discusses the applicability of the New York Convention to the enforcement of interim measures, and then introduces the judicial practice of States to assist arbitral tribunals in the extraterritorial enforcement of interim measures, Finally, the rules of the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration are expounded. The fifth chapter analyzes the legal provisions of the interim measures of international commercial arbitration in China from four aspects: the time of issue, the object of execution, the decision of decision and the organization of the court to examine and issue the interim measures, and points out the defects. Some suggestions are put forward.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D997.4

【引證文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 呂悅;彭劍波;;《國際商事仲裁示范法》與中國仲裁法關于臨時措施的比較研究[J];法制與經濟(上旬);2012年12期

，

本文編號：2311960