《農(nóng)業(yè)協(xié)定》框架下我國農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼法律體系之構(gòu)建
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-04 08:37
【摘要】：農(nóng)業(yè)是人類生存物質(zhì)資料的重要來源,是人類賴以生存和發(fā)展的最重要的產(chǎn)業(yè)。由于農(nóng)業(yè)本身弱質(zhì)性的限制,許多國家都采取一系列的農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼方式對農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)進(jìn)行支持和保護(hù)。 長期以來,我國都采取中央出臺政策文件的方式進(jìn)行農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼,然而政策缺乏法律所獨(dú)有的約束力和強(qiáng)制力,且存在著階段性和易變動的缺點(diǎn),也一直受到國內(nèi)學(xué)者的質(zhì)疑。因此,本文通過分析世界貿(mào)易組織《農(nóng)業(yè)協(xié)定》中“國內(nèi)支持”的內(nèi)容,對我國的農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策進(jìn)行歸納和總結(jié),并參考美國的農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼立法,對我國如何在世界貿(mào)易組織框架下對農(nóng)業(yè)進(jìn)行合理合法補(bǔ)貼,并建立符合我國國情的農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼法律體系提出了一些建議和設(shè)想。 本文除引言和結(jié)論外,正文部分分為五大章。 第一章首先分析了“補(bǔ)貼”一詞,并參考《農(nóng)業(yè)協(xié)定》起草過程中所產(chǎn)生的一些爭議,對農(nóng)業(yè)“國內(nèi)支持”和“國內(nèi)補(bǔ)貼”之間的聯(lián)系與區(qū)別進(jìn)行了界定,從而明確我國政府文件中使用的“農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼”在世界貿(mào)易組織《農(nóng)業(yè)協(xié)定》中的內(nèi)在涵義。 第二章歸納總結(jié)了世界貿(mào)易組織《農(nóng)業(yè)協(xié)定》中“免于削減的農(nóng)業(yè)支持政策”和“受削減承諾約束的國內(nèi)支持政策”,并通過分析巴西訴美國陸地棉補(bǔ)貼案,進(jìn)一步解釋了國內(nèi)農(nóng)業(yè)支持政策的內(nèi)容。 第三章詳細(xì)地歸納總結(jié)了我國2004以來中央政府頒布的政策文件,對我國的農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策進(jìn)行了具體的分類,并歸納了我國與農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼相關(guān)的法律制度。 第四章強(qiáng)調(diào)了建立農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼法律體系是符合國際法和國內(nèi)法要求的必然結(jié)果,而且我國也已經(jīng)具備了建立補(bǔ)貼法律的條件。 第五章論述的是在《農(nóng)業(yè)協(xié)定》下我國農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼法律體系的建構(gòu)。一方面分析了《美國2002年農(nóng)業(yè)法》的使用情況,并借鑒《美國2008年農(nóng)業(yè)法》,將我國符合“黃箱支持”的補(bǔ)貼和部分“綠箱支持”的補(bǔ)貼納入到“農(nóng)業(yè)直接補(bǔ)貼法”中。另一方面按照《農(nóng)業(yè)協(xié)定》附件2中免于削減承諾的國內(nèi)支持的分類對我國今后的農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼立法提出了一些建議。
[Abstract]:Agriculture is an important source of material for human survival and the most important industry for human survival and development. Because of the limitation of agriculture itself, many countries adopt a series of agricultural subsidies to support and protect the agricultural industry. For a long time, our country has adopted the central policy document to carry on the agricultural subsidy, but the policy lacks the unique binding force and the compulsive force of the law, and has the shortcoming of the stage and easy to change, also has been questioned by the domestic scholar all the time. Therefore, by analyzing the contents of "domestic support" in the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Agriculture, this paper sums up and summarizes the agricultural subsidy policies of our country, and refers to the agricultural subsidy legislation of the United States. This paper puts forward some suggestions and ideas on how to carry out reasonable and legal subsidies to agriculture under the framework of WTO and to establish a legal system of agricultural subsidies in accordance with the national conditions of our country. In addition to the introduction and conclusions, the text is divided into five chapters. The first chapter analyzes the term "subsidy" and defines the link and distinction between "domestic support" and "domestic subsidy" in agriculture, taking into account some disputes arising from the drafting process of the Agreement on Agriculture. Thus, the meaning of "agricultural subsidy" used in the government document of our country is clarified in the World Trade Organization Agreement on Agriculture. The second chapter summarizes the "Agriculture support Policy exempt from reduction" and "domestic support Policy bound by reduction commitment" in the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Agriculture, and analyzes the case of Brazil v. United States Upland Cotton subsidy. Further explained the content of domestic agricultural support policy. The third chapter summarizes the policy documents issued by the central government since 2004, classifies the agricultural subsidy policy in China, and summarizes the legal system related to agricultural subsidy in China. The fourth chapter emphasizes that the establishment of agricultural subsidy legal system is the inevitable result that meets the requirements of international law and domestic law, and our country already has the conditions to establish the subsidy law. The fifth chapter discusses the construction of China's agricultural subsidy legal system under the Agricultural Agreement. On the one hand, this paper analyzes the use of the Agriculture Act of 2002 in the United States, and draws lessons from the Agriculture Act of 2008 in order to bring the subsidies which accord with the "yellow box support" and some subsidies of "green box support" into the Agricultural Direct subsidy Act. On the other hand, according to the classification of domestic support for exemption from reduction commitments in Annex 2 to the Agreement on Agriculture, some suggestions are put forward for future agricultural subsidy legislation in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.1;D922.4;F320
本文編號：2309298
[Abstract]:Agriculture is an important source of material for human survival and the most important industry for human survival and development. Because of the limitation of agriculture itself, many countries adopt a series of agricultural subsidies to support and protect the agricultural industry. For a long time, our country has adopted the central policy document to carry on the agricultural subsidy, but the policy lacks the unique binding force and the compulsive force of the law, and has the shortcoming of the stage and easy to change, also has been questioned by the domestic scholar all the time. Therefore, by analyzing the contents of "domestic support" in the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Agriculture, this paper sums up and summarizes the agricultural subsidy policies of our country, and refers to the agricultural subsidy legislation of the United States. This paper puts forward some suggestions and ideas on how to carry out reasonable and legal subsidies to agriculture under the framework of WTO and to establish a legal system of agricultural subsidies in accordance with the national conditions of our country. In addition to the introduction and conclusions, the text is divided into five chapters. The first chapter analyzes the term "subsidy" and defines the link and distinction between "domestic support" and "domestic subsidy" in agriculture, taking into account some disputes arising from the drafting process of the Agreement on Agriculture. Thus, the meaning of "agricultural subsidy" used in the government document of our country is clarified in the World Trade Organization Agreement on Agriculture. The second chapter summarizes the "Agriculture support Policy exempt from reduction" and "domestic support Policy bound by reduction commitment" in the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Agriculture, and analyzes the case of Brazil v. United States Upland Cotton subsidy. Further explained the content of domestic agricultural support policy. The third chapter summarizes the policy documents issued by the central government since 2004, classifies the agricultural subsidy policy in China, and summarizes the legal system related to agricultural subsidy in China. The fourth chapter emphasizes that the establishment of agricultural subsidy legal system is the inevitable result that meets the requirements of international law and domestic law, and our country already has the conditions to establish the subsidy law. The fifth chapter discusses the construction of China's agricultural subsidy legal system under the Agricultural Agreement. On the one hand, this paper analyzes the use of the Agriculture Act of 2002 in the United States, and draws lessons from the Agriculture Act of 2008 in order to bring the subsidies which accord with the "yellow box support" and some subsidies of "green box support" into the Agricultural Direct subsidy Act. On the other hand, according to the classification of domestic support for exemption from reduction commitments in Annex 2 to the Agreement on Agriculture, some suggestions are put forward for future agricultural subsidy legislation in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.1;D922.4;F320
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 王瓊;WTO《農(nóng)業(yè)協(xié)定》中的“國內(nèi)支持”制度研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年
，本文編號：2309298
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2309298.html
最近更新
教材專著
