國際商事仲裁裁決發(fā)回重裁制度研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-03 21:15
【摘要】：隨著國際商事交往日益頻繁，仲裁制度在國際商事貿(mào)易中也發(fā)揮了很大作用。①然而，各國對于國際商事仲裁的立法規(guī)定并不是很完善，而我國對于國際商事仲裁中的發(fā)回重裁制度幾乎沒有涉及，只是對國內(nèi)發(fā)回重裁有一個原則性規(guī)定。國際商事仲裁中的發(fā)回重裁制度也很不完善，在筆者搜集的資料中沒有一國對其設(shè)立獨立的制度，，都是依附于撤銷作大概規(guī)定。而發(fā)回重裁在國際商事仲裁中的意義重大，應(yīng)當(dāng)予以重視。發(fā)回重裁制度是基于尊重仲裁獨立性和當(dāng)事人自主性的考慮而建立的司法監(jiān)督制度，仲裁必須依靠司法保障，完全擺脫司法監(jiān)督是不可能，但司法有限監(jiān)督、支持仲裁在現(xiàn)代國際商事仲裁的發(fā)展中也是很有必要的，因此發(fā)回重裁制度的建立才顯得尤為重要。它能避免仲裁瑕疵和錯誤，保障當(dāng)事人權(quán)利的同時也能兼顧保障仲裁的獨立性，使其達(dá)到完美平衡，它對于現(xiàn)代社會糾紛的解決也起著重要作用。②本文通過對仲裁性質(zhì)的剖析，從本質(zhì)層面分析了法院與仲裁的關(guān)系，同時分別研究國際上其他國家和《國際商事仲裁示范法》關(guān)于發(fā)回重裁制度的規(guī)定，最后對我國發(fā)回重裁制度構(gòu)建給予了建議。本文分為五個部分。第一部分重點討論法院對于國際商事仲裁司法監(jiān)督的必要性，并對相關(guān)司法補救措施進(jìn)行介紹。此部分是討論發(fā)回重裁這一對于仲裁裁決的司法監(jiān)督方式的基礎(chǔ)。第二部分探討了國際商事仲裁發(fā)回重裁制度的理論依據(jù)、涵義、適用以及意義等理論問題。第三部分通過對比英國、美國、德國等其他國家和《國際商事仲裁示范法》的發(fā)回重裁規(guī)定，對該制度進(jìn)行更深入剖析。第四部分在總結(jié)發(fā)回重裁制度理論和立法實踐之后歸納我國發(fā)回重裁制度存在的問題，并提出了意見。第五部分是對全文做全面總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:With the increasingly frequent international commercial exchanges, the arbitration system has also played a great role in international commercial trade. 1 however, the legislative provisions of international commercial arbitration are not very perfect. However, the system of retainer in international commercial arbitration is almost not involved in our country, but there is a rule of principle for domestic retainer. The system of readjudication in international commercial arbitration is also not perfect. In the data collected by the author, no country has set up an independent system for it, all of which are dependent on revocation as a general rule. The importance of readjudication in international commercial arbitration should be paid more attention to. The system of re-adjudication is based on the consideration of respect for the independence of arbitration and the autonomy of the parties. Arbitration must rely on judicial safeguards. It is impossible to completely get rid of judicial supervision, but judicial supervision is limited. It is also necessary to support arbitration in the development of modern international commercial arbitration. It can avoid the defects and mistakes of arbitration, protect the rights of the parties, but also protect the independence of arbitration, so that it can achieve a perfect balance. It also plays an important role in the settlement of disputes in modern society. 2 through the analysis of the nature of arbitration, this paper analyzes the relationship between the court and arbitration from the essential level. At the same time, the article studies the provisions of the system of retainer in other countries and the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, and finally gives some suggestions on the construction of the system of retainer in our country. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part focuses on the necessity of judicial supervision of international commercial arbitration by the court, and introduces the relevant judicial remedies. This part is the basis of the judicial supervision of arbitration award. The second part discusses the theoretical basis, meaning, application and significance of the international commercial arbitration system. In the third part, the author makes a deeper analysis of the system by contrasting the retainer provisions of other countries such as Britain, the United States, Germany and the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. The fourth part summarizes the theory and legislative practice of retainer system and points out the problems existing in the system. The fifth part is a comprehensive summary of the full text.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D997.4
本文編號：2309062
[Abstract]:With the increasingly frequent international commercial exchanges, the arbitration system has also played a great role in international commercial trade. 1 however, the legislative provisions of international commercial arbitration are not very perfect. However, the system of retainer in international commercial arbitration is almost not involved in our country, but there is a rule of principle for domestic retainer. The system of readjudication in international commercial arbitration is also not perfect. In the data collected by the author, no country has set up an independent system for it, all of which are dependent on revocation as a general rule. The importance of readjudication in international commercial arbitration should be paid more attention to. The system of re-adjudication is based on the consideration of respect for the independence of arbitration and the autonomy of the parties. Arbitration must rely on judicial safeguards. It is impossible to completely get rid of judicial supervision, but judicial supervision is limited. It is also necessary to support arbitration in the development of modern international commercial arbitration. It can avoid the defects and mistakes of arbitration, protect the rights of the parties, but also protect the independence of arbitration, so that it can achieve a perfect balance. It also plays an important role in the settlement of disputes in modern society. 2 through the analysis of the nature of arbitration, this paper analyzes the relationship between the court and arbitration from the essential level. At the same time, the article studies the provisions of the system of retainer in other countries and the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, and finally gives some suggestions on the construction of the system of retainer in our country. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part focuses on the necessity of judicial supervision of international commercial arbitration by the court, and introduces the relevant judicial remedies. This part is the basis of the judicial supervision of arbitration award. The second part discusses the theoretical basis, meaning, application and significance of the international commercial arbitration system. In the third part, the author makes a deeper analysis of the system by contrasting the retainer provisions of other countries such as Britain, the United States, Germany and the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. The fourth part summarizes the theory and legislative practice of retainer system and points out the problems existing in the system. The fifth part is a comprehensive summary of the full text.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D997.4
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李恩正;;從價值目標(biāo)談重新仲裁制度的構(gòu)建[J];東方企業(yè)文化;2010年10期
2 吳曉青;;試論重新仲裁開始后原仲裁裁決的法律效力——以《仲裁法解釋》第22條為中心討論[J];法制與社會;2009年14期
3 鮑薇;;國際商事仲裁價值取向與意思自治原則[J];法制與社會;2010年07期
4 周鐳鐳;;關(guān)于國際商事仲裁協(xié)議法律適用問題的幾點思考[J];法制與社會;2010年21期
5 何煉紅;論國際商事仲裁的性質(zhì)[J];湖南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年02期
6 張紅;;困境與出路:我國商事仲裁司法監(jiān)督機制研究[J];上饒師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年05期
7 王吉文;;我國重新仲裁制度的重構(gòu)——以重新仲裁的根據(jù)為視角[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年04期
8 張江敏;國際商事仲裁中的法律適用的若干問題探析[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年06期
9 石現(xiàn)明;;國際商事仲裁一裁終局的相對性[J];長安大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年04期
10 劉想樹;錯誤涉外仲裁裁決的識別與補救——兼論中國的立法和實踐[J];西南民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2002年08期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 莊碩;重新仲裁制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年
本文編號：2309062
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2309062.html
