【摘要】：WTO爭端解決機(jī)制為解決WTO成員之間的貿(mào)易爭端、保障WTO多邊貿(mào)易體制的健康運(yùn)行作出了巨大的貢獻(xiàn)。作為WTO爭端解決機(jī)制最后一道程序的執(zhí)行制度,其重要性不言自明。司法裁決能否得到有效執(zhí)行,正是考察一個(gè)法律體系的爭端解決機(jī)制是否完備、能否有效運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)的一個(gè)重要衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。然而,在WTO爭端解決的實(shí)踐中,執(zhí)行制度暴露出了許多問題和缺陷,只裁不行的案件屢見不鮮,這使得WTO成員不得不重新審視這一制度。目前,如何對爭端解決機(jī)構(gòu)裁決的執(zhí)行機(jī)制進(jìn)行修改,已成為熱門研究領(lǐng)域和世界貿(mào)易組織談判的議題之一 WTO較GATT而言對執(zhí)行程序規(guī)定了明確的時(shí)間界限,通過監(jiān)督機(jī)制、補(bǔ)償程序、報(bào)復(fù)程序,尤其是交叉報(bào)復(fù)程序加大了DSB裁決的執(zhí)行力度,但也難以避免存在自有缺陷,譬如合理期間容易惡意利用,執(zhí)行監(jiān)督程序規(guī)則過于簡單,交叉報(bào)復(fù)對發(fā)展中國家欠公平等等,這就使得這一機(jī)制本身非但不能促進(jìn)爭端解決,反而會(huì)引發(fā)一系列其他問題,因而對其改革勢在必行。DSU談判歷時(shí)多年,針對DSU改革問題WTO各成員也紛紛獻(xiàn)計(jì)獻(xiàn)策,而我國作為WTO成員之一,近年來與WTO其他成員的貿(mào)易爭端成逐步增多的態(tài)勢,并已切實(shí)感受到執(zhí)行制度的挑戰(zhàn),如何積極應(yīng)對也是我國面臨的現(xiàn)實(shí)問題。因而對我國而言,對WTO爭端解決機(jī)制的執(zhí)行制度進(jìn)行研究意義重大。 本文希望通過全面、多角度地分析裁決執(zhí)行這一程序制度,客觀地評價(jià)其價(jià)值、作用,通過實(shí)證和對比分析的方法明確其利弊,力求通過對DSU中主要執(zhí)行條款的解讀,并結(jié)合各WTO成員對DSU的修改提案,歸納裁決執(zhí)行階段的現(xiàn)實(shí)運(yùn)作,發(fā)現(xiàn)其中問題和亟待完善之處,并提出相應(yīng)的改革建議,爭取為進(jìn)一步開展WTO爭端解決機(jī)制及其執(zhí)行程序的研究,促進(jìn)各國積極參與并和平解決國際經(jīng)貿(mào)爭端,維護(hù)和實(shí)現(xiàn)各國經(jīng)濟(jì)利益作出貢獻(xiàn)。并在此基礎(chǔ)上提出我國應(yīng)對這一執(zhí)行制度的可控性建議,為我國更好的利用該制度構(gòu)建橋梁。
[Abstract]:The WTO dispute settlement mechanism has made great contributions to the settlement of trade disputes among WTO members and to the healthy operation of the WTO multilateral trading system. As the last procedure of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism, its importance is self-evident. Whether the judicial decision can be effectively implemented is an important measure to examine whether the dispute settlement mechanism of a legal system is complete and whether it can be operated effectively. However, in the practice of WTO dispute settlement, many problems and defects have been exposed in the implementation system, which makes the WTO members have to re-examine the system. At present, how to modify the enforcement mechanism of the dispute settlement bodies' rulings has become one of the hot research areas and one of the topics in the World Trade Organization (WTO) negotiations. WTO has defined a clear time limit for the implementation procedures compared with the GATT. Through the supervision mechanism, the compensation procedure, the revenge procedure, especially the cross-revenge procedure, the enforcement of the DSB ruling has been strengthened, but it is also difficult to avoid the inherent defects, such as the possibility of malicious exploitation within a reasonable period, and the simple enforcement of the supervisory procedure rules. Cross-revenge is unfair to developing countries, and so on, which makes the mechanism itself not only unable to promote dispute settlement, but also raises a series of other problems. Therefore, it is imperative to reform it. The DSU negotiations took many years. As one of the members of DSU, trade disputes with other members of WTO have been increasing in recent years, and the challenges of the implementation system have been felt. How to respond positively is also the realistic question that our country faces. Therefore, for our country, it is of great significance to study the implementation system of WTO dispute settlement mechanism. This paper hopes to analyze the procedural system of the enforcement of the award from a comprehensive and multi-angle way, to objectively evaluate its value and function, to clarify its advantages and disadvantages by means of empirical and comparative analysis, and to strive to interpret the main implementing clauses in the DSU. Combined with the amendment proposal of each WTO member to the DSU, the paper summarizes the actual operation of the ruling execution stage, finds out the problems and needs to be improved, and puts forward the corresponding reform suggestions. It aims to contribute to the further study of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism and its implementation procedures, to promote the active participation and peaceful settlement of international economic and trade disputes, and to safeguard and realize the economic interests of all countries. On the basis of this, the author puts forward some controllable suggestions for our country to make better use of the system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳偉;;試析WTO爭端解決機(jī)制[J];商業(yè)研究;2009年01期

2 楊卓;;WTO爭端解決機(jī)制及中國對該制度的運(yùn)用[J];長春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

3 陳立軍;匡青松;;WTO爭端案件執(zhí)行狀況分析[J];長沙航空職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

4 龔柏華;;中國參與WTO爭端解決機(jī)制實(shí)踐的評述[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

5 余麗;;WTO執(zhí)行爭端次序問題:雙邊解決和多邊完善[J];法律適用;2007年02期

6 趙文洋;;論WTO爭端解決機(jī)制對發(fā)展中成員方的待遇[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年12期

7 傅星國;;WTO爭端解決機(jī)制中的報(bào)復(fù)問題[J];國際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2009年05期

8 楊艷紅;;中國積極利用WTO爭端解決機(jī)制的戰(zhàn)略選擇[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2009年07期

9 程大為,王灝;國際貿(mào)易爭端解決過程中的制度性難點(diǎn)及企業(yè)對策[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)縱橫;2003年04期

10 余敏友;;中國參與WTO爭端解決活動(dòng)評述[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動(dòng)態(tài)與研究;2009年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 張軍旗;世界貿(mào)易組織監(jiān)督機(jī)制研究[D];中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2001年

2 楊仕輝;貿(mào)易爭端解決的博弈分析與策略研究[D];對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2006年

3 盧建祥;WTO裁決的強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行機(jī)制[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

4 毛燕瓊;WTO爭端解決機(jī)制問題與改革[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 陳杰輝;DSB建議或裁決的執(zhí)行制度研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2003年

2 丁國軍;論WTO爭端解決機(jī)制中的報(bào)復(fù)機(jī)制[D];蘇州大學(xué);2003年

3 蔡芳;WTO爭端解決中的執(zhí)行機(jī)制研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2005年

4 楊文杰;GATT/WTO貿(mào)易報(bào)復(fù)措施研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年

5 任祥;WTO爭端解決機(jī)制的裁決執(zhí)行制度研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

6 陳冠軍;芻議WTO爭端解決機(jī)制的執(zhí)行程序[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

7 郭恒;WTO爭端解決機(jī)制研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2007年

8 李政;論WTO爭端解決機(jī)制的改革與完善[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年

9 仇婷婷;論WTO爭端解決機(jī)制的執(zhí)行制度及我國的應(yīng)對策略[D];蘭州大學(xué);2008年

10 周樹園;WTO爭端解決機(jī)制下的發(fā)展中國家探析[D];中國政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2277447