南海仲裁案實(shí)體裁決的島礁法律地位判定:法律悖誤與中國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-10-17 14:11
【摘要】:中菲南海爭(zhēng)端的實(shí)質(zhì)是相關(guān)島礁的領(lǐng)土主權(quán)爭(zhēng)端以及與之相關(guān)的海域劃界爭(zhēng)端。菲律賓無(wú)視中國(guó)將南沙群島作為一個(gè)整體主張權(quán)利的事實(shí),將南沙群島進(jìn)行分割,要求對(duì)中國(guó)占領(lǐng)或控制的9個(gè)島礁的海洋權(quán)利進(jìn)行逐一判定。仲裁庭無(wú)視自身對(duì)爭(zhēng)端主題事項(xiàng)并無(wú)管轄權(quán)的事實(shí),錯(cuò)誤地認(rèn)定事實(shí)與適用法律,使用本末倒置、自相矛盾的論證方式支持了菲律賓幾乎全部的仲裁請(qǐng)求。面對(duì)已經(jīng)作出的仲裁裁決,中國(guó)的當(dāng)務(wù)之急是加強(qiáng)對(duì)裁決書細(xì)節(jié)的分析研究,在法理上進(jìn)行有理有據(jù)的批駁,為中國(guó)“不接受、不承認(rèn)”的立場(chǎng)找出正當(dāng)?shù)囊罁?jù)。從長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)看,中國(guó)還應(yīng)為今后可能出現(xiàn)的連鎖反應(yīng)提前做好對(duì)案,而最理想、最有效的對(duì)案就是證明中國(guó)在南海是以“群島”為單位主張海洋權(quán)利以及洋中群島制度適用于南海四大群島具有習(xí)慣國(guó)際法的基礎(chǔ),防止中國(guó)在南海的權(quán)利被“切割”。
[Abstract]:The essence of the South China Sea dispute between China and the Philippines is the territorial sovereignty dispute between the islands and reefs and the maritime delimitation dispute. Ignoring the fact that China claims the Nansha Islands as a whole, the Philippines divides the Spratly Islands and demands that the maritime rights of the nine islands and reefs under China's occupation or control be determined one by one. Ignoring the fact that it does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the dispute, the arbitral tribunal wrongly finds the facts and applicable law, uses the reverse of the cart and contradicts the argument to support almost all the arbitration requests of the Philippines. In the face of the arbitration award that has been made, China's urgent task is to strengthen the analysis and study of the details of the award, and to refute the legal principles in order to find a legitimate basis for China's stand of "not accepting and not recognizing." In the long run, China should also prepare the case in advance for the possible chain reaction in the future, and ideally, The most effective case is to prove that China claims maritime rights on the basis of "islands" in the South China Sea, and that the application of the "mid-ocean archipelago" system to the four islands in the South China Sea has the basis of customary international law to prevent China's rights in the South China Sea from being "cut".
【作者單位】: 吉林大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】:D993.5
本文編號(hào):2276929
[Abstract]:The essence of the South China Sea dispute between China and the Philippines is the territorial sovereignty dispute between the islands and reefs and the maritime delimitation dispute. Ignoring the fact that China claims the Nansha Islands as a whole, the Philippines divides the Spratly Islands and demands that the maritime rights of the nine islands and reefs under China's occupation or control be determined one by one. Ignoring the fact that it does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the dispute, the arbitral tribunal wrongly finds the facts and applicable law, uses the reverse of the cart and contradicts the argument to support almost all the arbitration requests of the Philippines. In the face of the arbitration award that has been made, China's urgent task is to strengthen the analysis and study of the details of the award, and to refute the legal principles in order to find a legitimate basis for China's stand of "not accepting and not recognizing." In the long run, China should also prepare the case in advance for the possible chain reaction in the future, and ideally, The most effective case is to prove that China claims maritime rights on the basis of "islands" in the South China Sea, and that the application of the "mid-ocean archipelago" system to the four islands in the South China Sea has the basis of customary international law to prevent China's rights in the South China Sea from being "cut".
【作者單位】: 吉林大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】:D993.5
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 姜世波;習(xí)慣國(guó)際法的司法確定[D];山東大學(xué);2009年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 鄧荷琳;美國(guó)投資條約實(shí)踐中的習(xí)慣國(guó)際法問(wèn)題[D];廈門大學(xué);2014年
2 劉懿德;論“或引渡或起訴”義務(wù)[D];外交學(xué)院;2011年
,本文編號(hào):2276929
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2276929.html
最近更新
教材專著