【摘要】：中菲南海爭端的實(shí)質(zhì)是相關(guān)島礁的領(lǐng)土主權(quán)爭端以及與之相關(guān)的海域劃界爭端。菲律賓無視中國將南沙群島作為一個(gè)整體主張權(quán)利的事實(shí),將南沙群島進(jìn)行分割,要求對中國占領(lǐng)或控制的9個(gè)島礁的海洋權(quán)利進(jìn)行逐一判定。仲裁庭無視自身對爭端主題事項(xiàng)并無管轄權(quán)的事實(shí),錯(cuò)誤地認(rèn)定事實(shí)與適用法律,使用本末倒置、自相矛盾的論證方式支持了菲律賓幾乎全部的仲裁請求。面對已經(jīng)作出的仲裁裁決,中國的當(dāng)務(wù)之急是加強(qiáng)對裁決書細(xì)節(jié)的分析研究,在法理上進(jìn)行有理有據(jù)的批駁,為中國“不接受、不承認(rèn)”的立場找出正當(dāng)?shù)囊罁?jù)。從長遠(yuǎn)看,中國還應(yīng)為今后可能出現(xiàn)的連鎖反應(yīng)提前做好對案,而最理想、最有效的對案就是證明中國在南海是以“群島”為單位主張海洋權(quán)利以及洋中群島制度適用于南海四大群島具有習(xí)慣國際法的基礎(chǔ),防止中國在南海的權(quán)利被“切割”。
[Abstract]:The essence of the South China Sea dispute between China and the Philippines is the territorial sovereignty dispute between the islands and reefs and the maritime delimitation dispute. Ignoring the fact that China claims the Nansha Islands as a whole, the Philippines divides the Spratly Islands and demands that the maritime rights of the nine islands and reefs under China's occupation or control be determined one by one. Ignoring the fact that it does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the dispute, the arbitral tribunal wrongly finds the facts and applicable law, uses the reverse of the cart and contradicts the argument to support almost all the arbitration requests of the Philippines. In the face of the arbitration award that has been made, China's urgent task is to strengthen the analysis and study of the details of the award, and to refute the legal principles in order to find a legitimate basis for China's stand of "not accepting and not recognizing." In the long run, China should also prepare the case in advance for the possible chain reaction in the future, and ideally, The most effective case is to prove that China claims maritime rights on the basis of "islands" in the South China Sea, and that the application of the "mid-ocean archipelago" system to the four islands in the South China Sea has the basis of customary international law to prevent China's rights in the South China Sea from being "cut".
【作者單位】： 吉林大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D993.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 姜世波;習(xí)慣國際法的司法確定[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 鄧荷琳;美國投資條約實(shí)踐中的習(xí)慣國際法問題[D];廈門大學(xué);2014年

2 劉懿德;論“或引渡或起訴”義務(wù)[D];外交學(xué)院;2011年

，

本文編號：2276928