【摘要】：隨著國(guó)際貿(mào)易的不斷發(fā)展，傾銷也經(jīng)歷了不同的階段，它起源于重商主義時(shí)期的“獎(jiǎng)出罰入”的貿(mào)易政策，是以擴(kuò)大產(chǎn)品的市場(chǎng)份額，增加貿(mào)易順差為目的，至今已經(jīng)有很久遠(yuǎn)的歷史了。傾銷實(shí)質(zhì)上是一種不正當(dāng)?shù)母?jìng)爭(zhēng)行為，出口商希望通過傾銷來打擊進(jìn)口國(guó)同類產(chǎn)品的市場(chǎng)份額，以此來打擊競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手，在進(jìn)口國(guó)市場(chǎng)上獲得長(zhǎng)久的優(yōu)勢(shì)地位，這種行為是應(yīng)當(dāng)通過進(jìn)口國(guó)的國(guó)內(nèi)的反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法或者壟斷法來調(diào)整的。今天，反傾銷已經(jīng)成為各國(guó)貿(mào)易重要的非關(guān)稅壁壘，是一種變相的貿(mào)易保護(hù)形式。如果我國(guó)要很好地利用反傾銷機(jī)制，是需要有完善、合理、公正、可操作性的反傾銷程序來支持的，而這其中的關(guān)鍵的部分就是證據(jù)問題，只有正確得把握證據(jù)的相關(guān)的規(guī)定、不利的舉證后果才能更好地運(yùn)用反傾銷機(jī)制來達(dá)到保護(hù)本國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)的目的。 本文主要從反傾銷調(diào)查過程的證據(jù)規(guī)則這一角度來對(duì)我國(guó)的反傾銷機(jī)制來進(jìn)行研究，共分為四章。第一章是對(duì)反傾銷調(diào)查程序概念、性質(zhì)的介紹，，結(jié)合證據(jù)的定義、作用，對(duì)反傾銷調(diào)查程序證據(jù)規(guī)則這一概念作了新的厘定，并突出比較反傾銷立案程序與反傾銷調(diào)查程序的異同；第一章的后半部分著重介紹GATT/WTO時(shí)期的立法演進(jìn)過程，對(duì)其中涉及調(diào)查過程中的證據(jù)規(guī)則作了總結(jié)。第二章介紹了WTO框架下關(guān)于反傾銷調(diào)查程序證據(jù)規(guī)則的分類，主要是根據(jù)不同證據(jù)規(guī)則所起的作用來劃分，分為證據(jù)提供主體的規(guī)則，證據(jù)提供的期限規(guī)則，信息保密規(guī)則，證據(jù)核實(shí)規(guī)則及可獲得最佳信息規(guī)則。第三章分別介紹了美國(guó)、歐盟對(duì)反傾銷調(diào)查過程涉及證據(jù)方面分別作了相關(guān)的總結(jié)，對(duì)這些國(guó)家或地區(qū)的涉及證據(jù)的規(guī)定的重要規(guī)則作了重點(diǎn)的介紹。文章的第四部分是對(duì)我國(guó)反傾銷法的立法和實(shí)踐作了介紹，結(jié)合反傾銷證據(jù)規(guī)則具體的案例，對(duì)我國(guó)的反傾銷的立法和實(shí)踐提出建議。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of international trade, dumping also experienced different stages. It originated in the mercantilist period of "reward out penalty" trade policy, with the purpose of expanding the market share of products and increasing trade surplus. There is a long history so far. Dumping is essentially an unfair competitive act. Exporters hope to crack down on the market share of similar products in the importing country by dumping, so as to strike a blow at their competitors and gain a long-term advantage in the market of the importing country. This behavior should be regulated by the domestic anti-unfair competition law or the ridge-cutting law of the importing country. Today, anti-dumping has become an important non-tariff barrier and a disguised form of trade protection. If China wants to make good use of the anti-dumping mechanism, it needs a sound, reasonable, fair and operational anti-dumping procedure to support it, and the key part of this is the evidence problem. Only by correctly grasping the relevant provisions of the evidence, Adverse consequences of proof can better use the anti-dumping mechanism to achieve the purpose of protecting domestic industries. This paper mainly studies the anti-dumping mechanism of China from the point of view of the rules of evidence in the process of anti-dumping investigation, which is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is the introduction of the concept and nature of anti-dumping investigation procedure, combined with the definition and function of evidence, and makes a new definition of the concept of the rules of evidence of anti-dumping investigation procedure. The second half of the first chapter focuses on the legislative evolution of the period of GATT/WTO, and summarizes the rules of evidence involved in the process of investigation. The second chapter introduces the classification of evidence rules of anti-dumping investigation procedure under the framework of WTO, which is divided into the rules of the main body of evidence, the time limit of providing evidence and the rules of information confidentiality according to the function of different rules of evidence. Evidence verification rules and best available information rules. The third chapter introduces the United States and the European Union respectively to the anti-dumping investigation process involved in evidence aspects of the relevant summary of these countries or regions of the important rules relating to evidence made a focus on the introduction. The fourth part introduces the legislation and practice of our country's anti-dumping law, and puts forward some suggestions on our country's antidumping legislation and practice in combination with the specific cases of anti-dumping evidence rules.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 劉新宇;試析美國(guó)對(duì)華第一起特殊保障措施案[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年09期

2 陳明聰,陶立峰;反傾銷調(diào)查中證據(jù)提供的法律問題[J];法學(xué);2004年06期

3 海聞;李清亮;;加入WTO十年來中國(guó)對(duì)外反傾銷實(shí)踐分析[J];國(guó)際商務(wù)研究;2011年03期

4 張炳生;姚立國(guó);蔣敏;;中美輪胎特保案的法律困境及WTO下的貿(mào)易政策[J];寧波大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文科學(xué)版);2010年01期

5 黃志瑾;;中美輪胎特保案專家組報(bào)告評(píng)析——敗訴的啟示[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動(dòng)態(tài)與研究;2011年02期

6 丁國(guó)民;;立法破解對(duì)華貿(mào)易保護(hù)危機(jī)——基于WTO框架下的中國(guó)反傾銷立法思考[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 孫娜;關(guān)于印度反傾銷機(jī)制問題的研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

2 張?zhí)m;論WTO框架下反傾銷調(diào)查程序中的證據(jù)問題[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

3 楊剛;歐盟反傾銷法律制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2003年

本文編號(hào)：2254595