【摘要】：改革開放以來,由于我國的非市場經(jīng)濟(jì)地位及其對外貿(mào)易的快速增長,一直受到反傾銷的指控。尤其是上世紀(jì)九十年代以來,中國作為世界貿(mào)易大國地位的確立把中國推到了國際經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易的風(fēng)口浪尖上,使得中國與歐盟、美國、日本等發(fā)達(dá)國家的貿(mào)易摩擦越演越烈,國外對中國發(fā)起的反傾銷數(shù)量與日劇增,致使中國的國際貿(mào)易屢遭創(chuàng)傷,各國對我出口產(chǎn)品的頻頻反傾銷已經(jīng)構(gòu)成了對我國經(jīng)貿(mào)發(fā)展的實(shí)質(zhì)性障礙。在發(fā)達(dá)國家紛紛向我國發(fā)起反傾銷措施的同時(shí),大量的美國、歐盟等發(fā)達(dá)國家的國內(nèi)產(chǎn)品也正在以傾銷的方式進(jìn)入中國,給中國的國內(nèi)相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)造成了損失。但是由于我國在反傾銷方面的立法不完善、組織機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置不緊密、反傾銷意識的淡薄、反傾銷手段的不成熟等導(dǎo)致我國在面臨國外產(chǎn)品的危害時(shí)沒有積極有效的應(yīng)對策略。這也就是進(jìn)些年雖然中國對外發(fā)起的反傾銷案件在數(shù)量上有所增加,但在質(zhì)量上仍然有限的原因。 本文就是以中國向美國、歐盟發(fā)起關(guān)于耐磨紙傾銷案為背景,以WTO《反傾銷協(xié)議》為基本理論框架、以《中華人民共和國反傾銷條例》為具體法律依據(jù)對中國反傾銷進(jìn)行分析。本文主要從四個(gè)部分進(jìn)行分析。第一部分主要以案例為基準(zhǔn),在概述案例的基礎(chǔ)上分析我國的反傾銷立法概況、對傾銷與反傾銷的具體規(guī)定,進(jìn)而分析對本案決定發(fā)起反傾銷調(diào)查的主要認(rèn)定依據(jù)。第二部分主要是在WTO的理論框架下,結(jié)合中國現(xiàn)有的立法,具體從事實(shí)方面與法律方面來分析本案的焦點(diǎn)問題。第三部分結(jié)合中國國反傾銷的現(xiàn)狀來分析反傾銷的積極與消極的經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng),進(jìn)而對發(fā)起反傾銷調(diào)查進(jìn)行理性的思考。第四部分綜合中國反傾銷方面的不足,提出應(yīng)對之策。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China has been accused of anti-dumping because of its non-market economy status and the rapid growth of its foreign trade. In particular, since the 1990s, the establishment of China's status as a major trading power in the world has pushed China to the forefront of international economic and trade affairs, making trade frictions between China and developed countries such as the European Union, the United States, Japan and other developed countries more and more intense. The number and daily increase of anti-dumping launched by foreign countries against China have caused China's international trade to be traumatized repeatedly. The frequent anti-dumping of China's export products has already constituted a substantial obstacle to the development of China's economy and trade. While developed countries have launched anti-dumping measures against China, a large number of developed countries, such as the United States, the European Union and other domestic products are also dumping into China, causing losses to China's domestic related industries. However, due to the imperfection of our country's antidumping legislation, the lack of close organization, the weak awareness of anti-dumping and the immature of anti-dumping measures, China has no active and effective countermeasures in the face of the harm of foreign products. This is why the number of anti-dumping cases initiated by China has increased, but the quality is still limited. This paper is based on the case of wear-resistant paper dumping initiated by China to the United States and the European Union, taking the Anti-dumping Agreement of WTO as the basic theoretical framework, and taking the Anti-dumping regulations of the people's Republic of China as the specific legal basis to analyze China's anti-dumping. This article mainly carries on the analysis from four parts. The first part is mainly based on the case, on the basis of an overview of the case analysis of China's anti-dumping legislation, dumping and anti-dumping specific provisions, and then analyzed the decision to initiate anti-dumping investigation of the main basis of the case. The second part is mainly under the WTO theory frame, unifies the Chinese present legislation, concretely from the fact aspect and the legal aspect to analyze the case the focal point question. The third part analyzes the positive and negative economic effects of antidumping combined with the current situation of anti-dumping in China, and then carries on rational thinking on initiating anti-dumping investigation. The fourth part synthesizes China's anti-dumping deficiency and puts forward countermeasures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：F752.02;D996

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 許丹;;反傾銷會計(jì)下中外成本核算差異及對策思考[J];財(cái)會月刊;2012年01期

2 邢乃千;;WTO規(guī)則與我國反傾銷法的完善[J];財(cái)經(jīng)政法資訊;2006年01期

3 方瀟;中國反傾銷立法的缺陷和完善[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年02期

4 郭壽康;;加入世界貿(mào)易組織與我國立法的有關(guān)問題[J];法學(xué)家;2001年02期

5 程衛(wèi)東;國與國之間的利益協(xié)調(diào)——國際反傾銷法的晚近發(fā)展[J];國際貿(mào)易;2001年08期

6 陳漢林;;美國對華反傾銷的貿(mào)易轉(zhuǎn)移效應(yīng)分析及對策[J];國際貿(mào)易;2008年09期

7 李邦君;入世后中國外貿(mào)結(jié)構(gòu)的新變化及其發(fā)展新趨勢[J];國際商務(wù)研究;2005年03期

8 龔家友,滕玉華;中國反傾銷實(shí)施中的投資跨越效應(yīng)分析[J];華東經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2005年08期

9 方勇,張二震;出口產(chǎn)品反傾銷預(yù)警的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年01期

10 鮑曉華;中國實(shí)施反傾銷措施的經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng)分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)縱橫;2004年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 PHO DANIEL（符勇）;反傾銷法與公平貿(mào)易研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2003年

2 陳明聰;經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化趨勢下反傾銷的法律問題研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 史云慶;反傾銷產(chǎn)業(yè)損害及因果關(guān)系評判的多因素研究[D];北京化工大學(xué);2005年

2 鄭麗娜;WTO規(guī)則下我國反傾銷立法與實(shí)踐的研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2003年

，

本文編號：2245505