【摘要】：隨著國際貿(mào)易日益發(fā)展,反傾銷規(guī)則在實施中也越來越多遇到了困難。為了追求利益,各國出口商在被采取反傾銷措施之后,紛紛趨向規(guī)避謀求利潤。歐盟、美國早在1987年以來就注意到了這一現(xiàn)象及其對國際貿(mào)易造成的侵害,紛紛進行立法;烏拉圭回合談判中,也曾試圖調(diào)和各國利益,制定國際統(tǒng)一規(guī)則,但最終未能寫入GATT1994的最終文件,但是幸運的是,《鄧克爾草案》已經(jīng)各國討論,部長決議安排反規(guī)避非正式小組對該問題繼續(xù)探討,建立反規(guī)避的國際統(tǒng)一規(guī)則,指日可待。 本文共分六章。 第一章介紹了反規(guī)避法律問題的概念、起源,分析了反規(guī)避問題的基本內(nèi)涵,并參考了歐美相關(guān)立法及WTO對相關(guān)問題所作的嘗試,界定了規(guī)避行為的法學(xué)定義、規(guī)避行為的分類,以及對反規(guī)避措施提出了自己的見解。 第二章是對反規(guī)避機制的正當性探究。內(nèi)容包括合理性和與WTO規(guī)則一致性兩個部分,從理論和實踐兩個角度進行論證,內(nèi)容上結(jié)合了反規(guī)避對反傾銷實施的作用,和對國際投資的影響,并通過探討反規(guī)避機制與WTO基本原則、《建立世界貿(mào)易組織協(xié)議》的一致性以及從GATT專家組的裁決三個角度,分析了其與WTO規(guī)則的一致性。 第三章和第四章分別對歐盟和美國的反傾銷制度進行了介紹,通過實體規(guī)則和程序規(guī)則兩個角度進行,中間穿插了案例分析和立法的改革,并在第五章對二者內(nèi)容從實體和程序上進行了對比。在第五章除了對歐美反規(guī)避立法進行橫向?qū)Ρ戎?還將二者規(guī)定與《鄧克爾草案》這一WTO曾經(jīng)為反規(guī)避機制做的嘗試進行了縱向?qū)Ρ?法律比較分析的運用為下一章探討中國反規(guī)避機制的構(gòu)建和建議提供了基礎(chǔ)和素材。 最后一章結(jié)合了歐美反規(guī)避立法的經(jīng)驗和對比,并借鑒《鄧克爾草案》的內(nèi)容,為構(gòu)建我國反規(guī)避立法體系提出了構(gòu)想,并對完善相關(guān)規(guī)定、解決實踐中的問題提出了建議。
[Abstract]:With the development of international trade, anti-dumping rules have encountered more and more difficulties. In order to pursue interests, exporters of various countries tend to avoid seeking profits after being taken anti-dumping measures. Since 1987, the European Union and the United States have noticed this phenomenon and its encroachment on international trade. They have legislated one after another. During the Uruguay Round negotiations, they also tried to reconcile the interests of all countries and formulate international uniform rules. But it was not written into the final document of the GATT1994, but fortunately, the Dunkel draft has already been discussed, and ministers have decided to arrange an informal group on anti-circumvention to continue to discuss the issue and to establish international uniform anti-circumvention rules. This paper is divided into six chapters. The first chapter introduces the concept and origin of anti-circumvention legal problem, analyzes the basic connotation of anti-circumvention problem, and defines the legal definition of circumvention behavior by referring to the relevant legislation in Europe and the United States and the attempt made by WTO. The classification of circumvention behavior, as well as the anti-circumvention measures put forward their own views. The second chapter explores the legitimacy of anti-circumvention mechanism. The content includes two parts: rationality and consistency with WTO rules, which are demonstrated from two aspects of theory and practice. The content combines the role of anti-circumvention on the implementation of anti-dumping, and the impact on international investment. Through the discussion of the anti-circumvention mechanism and the basic principles of WTO, the consistency of the Agreement of establishing the World Trade Organization and the ruling of the expert Group of GATT, this paper analyzes its consistency with the rules of WTO. The third and fourth chapters introduce the anti-dumping system of the EU and the United States respectively, through the substantive rules and procedural rules, the case analysis and legislative reform are interspersed in the middle. And in the fifth chapter, the content of the two from the substantive and procedural comparison. In the fifth chapter, in addition to the horizontal comparison of the anti-circumvention legislation in Europe and the United States, the two provisions are also compared vertically with the "Dunkel draft", an attempt made by the WTO for the anti-circumvention mechanism. The application of comparative legal analysis provides the basis and material for the next chapter to discuss the construction and suggestion of anti-circumvention mechanism in China. The last chapter combines the experience and contrast of European and American anti-circumvention legislation, and draws on the content of "Dunkel draft", puts forward some ideas for the construction of anti-circumvention legislation system in China, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect the relevant regulations and solve the problems in practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.1

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 谷婀娜;反規(guī)避法律問題研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：2245092